[Sampling effort and floristic atlases: survey completeness of localities and description of knowledge gaps]. / Effort d'échantillonnage et atlas floristiques - exhaustivité des mailles et caractérisation des lacunes dans la connaissance.

Floristic atlases have an important input to flora conservation planning even though their data quality varied greatly across countries. This study aimed to assess survey completeness of cells of floristic atlases. Then, a surveying guide is designed to overcome as efficiently as possible sampling biases. A review and analyses on a wide dataset were carried out to select an estimator of the true species richness of surveyed cells. The Jackknife 1, a non-parametric estimator, appeared as the best compromise for regional floristic atlases. The number of records in each cell was used as an estimator of sampling effort. The ratio between the observed species richness and the estimated species richness measures the completeness of inventories in each surveyed cell. Eighteen variables were selected to describe current inventories and design new surveys. These variables highlight locations, periods and species to be given priority in future studies.

Population structure of an endangered species living in contrasted habitats: Parnassia palustris (Saxifragaceae).

In endangered species, it is critical to analyse the level at which populations interact (i.e. dispersal) as well as the levels of inbreeding and local adaptation to set up conservation policies. These parameters were investigated in the endangered species Parnassia palustris living in contrasted habitats. We analysed population structure in 14 populations of northern France for isozymes, cpDNA markers and phenotypic traits related to fitness. Within population genetic diversity and inbreeding coefficients were not correlated to population size. Populations seem not to have undergone severe recent bottleneck. Conversely to pollen migration, seed migration seems limited at a regional scale, which could prevent colonization of new sites even if suitable habitats appear. Finally, the habitat type affects neither within-population genetic diversity nor genetic and phenotypic differentiation among populations. Thus, even if unnoticed local adaptation to habitats exists, it does not influence gene flow between populations.