Quality of life 12 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between preoperative risk factors, postoperative chronic pain, sleep, and gender on perceptions of quality of life (QoL) in a sample of 123 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients 12 months after surgery. A secondary purpose was to determine whether there is concordance between spousal and patient reporting of QoL after CABG surgery. DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative study. SETTING: The study setting included patients living in the community, who had had CABG surgery 12 months earlier at The Alfred hospital, a major metropolitan public acute care center, in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants were 123 adult patients (mean age = 64 years) who had undergone CABG surgery and had participated in a recent clinical trial. These patients were followed up to 12 months. The patient's spouse or next of kin (NoK) was asked questions about their perception of change in the patient's QoL. INSTRUMENTS: Results were assessed using The Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire and additional questions given at 12 months after CABG surgery. The Cleveland Clinic Clinical Severity Score (CSS) was used preoperatively as a tool to predict QoL outcome. RESULTS: Significant improvements in QoL, as measured by the SF-36, were seen in physical functioning (P <.0001), bodily pain (P =.024), social functioning (P =.011), and role limitations resulting from emotional status (P =.003). Other significant associations (P =.002) were found between poor QoL and patients who reported severe pain or poor quality sleep. Low-risk patients, as identified by the preoperative CSS, were more likely to have improved QoL at 12 months. Alteration in QoL was reported equally by patients and their spouses or NoK. Short-term memory impairment was reported by 41% of spouses or NoK. CONCLUSIONS: CABG surgery results in improved QoL for the majority of patients with extensive coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, some patients continue to have severe pain, sleep disturbances, and altered relationship with their spouse or NoK 12 months after surgery.

Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in lumbar epidural anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare the epidural use of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery. In a double-blind, randomized, multi-centre study involving 67 patients, thirty-two patients received 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 35 patients received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine at the L2,3 or L3,4 interspace. Parameters measured were the onset time, duration and spread of sensory block, the onset time, duration and degree of motor block, the quality of anaesthesia and the heart rate and blood pressure profile during block onset. Four patients (3 ropivacaine, 1 bupivacaine) were excluded from the study due to technical failure of the block. The onset and duration of analgesia at the T10 dermatome (median, interquartile range) was 10 (5-15) minutes and 3.5 (2.7-4.3) hours respectively for ropivacaine, and was 10 (6-15) minutes and 3.4 (2.5-3.8) hours respectively for bupivacaine. Maximum block height (median, range) was T6 (T2-T12) for ropivacaine and T6 (C7-T10) for bupivacaine. Nine patients receiving ropivacaine and eight patients receiving bupivacaine developed no apparent motor block. The incidence of complete motor block (Bromage grade 3) was low in both groups, being 4/27 for ropivacaine and 6/34 for bupivacaine. In the ropivacaine group, motor and sensory block were judged to be satisfactory in 78% of patients. In the bupivacaine group, motor and sensory block were judged to be satisfactory in 71% and 62% of patients respectively. Cardiovascular changes were similar in both groups. No statistical differences were found between the two groups regarding any of the study parameters.