Melanoma survivors: health behaviors, surveillance, psychosocial factors, and family concerns.

BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted on melanoma survivors and important opportunities exist for research in this understudied population. The study objective was to examine experiences of melanoma survivors regarding sun protection, surveillance practices, psychosocial and family concerns using focus groups. METHODS: We identified patients (≥ 18 years) treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (USA) during 1996-2005 with invasive primary cutaneous melanoma, stages I-III. We stratified focus groups by age (<50 vs ≥ 50 years) and years since diagnosis (1 to <5 years vs 5-10 years). We performed qualitative thematic text analysis, which involved independent data review by multiple analysts (n = 2) followed by interpretation of key findings via consensus work. RESULTS: Forty-eight survivors composed the final sample. Most did not conduct routine skin self-examinations. Survivors became more conscious of sun exposure and expanded their sun protection; some experienced anxiety if caught unprotected in the sun. Survivors were aware of the increased melanoma risk for family members, yet many did not discuss risk reduction. Melanoma diagnosis elevated the importance of retaining health insurance and purchasing life insurance for younger survivors. We did not identify significance difference between those diagnosed more or less recently. CONCLUSIONS: We identified areas of high priority to melanoma survivors: skin self-examination, anxiety associated with sun exposure, familial risk communication, and maintaining health insurance benefits. The implications for cancer survivors are that these behavioral data will help to design health promotion and prevention programs that are tailored to melanoma survivors' risk status.

Communication about family members' risk of melanoma: self-reported practices of dermatologists in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To assess current self-reported communication and screening practices of dermatologists to their patients with melanoma about family members' risk of melanoma at the time of diagnosis and to understand the barriers that dermatologists encounter in communicating risk to patients. DESIGN: Descriptive survey study. SETTING: Office-based practicing physicians in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand dermatologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Melanoma risk communication practices. RESULTS: Of 974 eligible dermatologists, 406 completed the survey (response rate, 41.7%). Almost 85% of dermatologists reported that they often or always communicate risk to patients with melanoma about their first-degree relatives, and almost 80% reported that they often or always advise their patients with melanoma that their older children (18 years) may be at greater risk of skin cancer. However, less than 50% of dermatologists routinely offered to screen first-degree relatives who live nearby, while only 19.7% used medical record reminders to note communication of melanoma risk to family members. Most dermatologists reported no major barriers to melanoma risk communication. However, the presence of "any risk communication barrier" (time constraints, absence of guidelines, or lack of written material) was associated with reduced melanoma risk communication practices by dermatologists. CONCLUSIONS: The observed high rates of self-reported risk communication by dermatologists to patients with melanoma about their first-degree family members are encouraging. However, the reported low rates of actual screening of first-degree relatives warrant easy-to-administer office-based medical record reminders to facilitate and optimize screening of at-risk relatives.

Skin cancer screening by dermatologists, family practitioners, and internists: barriers and facilitating factors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine barriers and facilitating factors to skin cancer screening practices among US primary care physicians and dermatologists. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Physicians randomly selected from the American Medical Association's Medical Marketing Services database from April 1 through November 30, 2005. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2999 US dermatologists, family practitioners, and internists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results based on 1669 surveys returned regarding practice characteristics, skin cancer screening behaviors, and barriers and facilitating factors to performing full-body skin examinations for patients. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 59.2%. More dermatologists (552 [81.3%]) reported performing full-body skin examinations on patients than did family practitioners (333 [59.6%]) (P < .05) or internists (243 [56.4%]) (P < .05). Among all physicians, time constraints, competing comorbidities, and patient embarrassment were reported as the top 3 barriers to performing full-body skin examinations, and these barriers were different among medical specialties. Among all physicians, having patients at high risk for skin cancer, patient demand for complete examination/mole check, and the influence of medical training were reported as facilitating factors to performing full-body skin examinations. CONCLUSION: Becoming more knowledgeable about physician barriers to skin cancer screening could help improve primary and secondary practices in both the primary care and dermatology settings.

Study of Nevi in Children (SONIC): baseline findings and predictors of nevus count.

The authors report baseline findings and predictors of nevus count (log total nevi) at the completion of year 1 (2004) of the first known population-based, prospective study of nevi in a US cohort of children. Overall, 64% (n = 443/691) of grade 5 students and their parents in Framingham, Massachusetts, completed surveys and underwent digital photography. Total nevus count was associated with skin and hair color and tendency to burn, as measured by a sun sensitivity index. In multivariate analyses, male gender (rate ratio (RR) = 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22, 1.55; P < 0.0001), spending 5-6 weekly hours outdoors between 10 AM and 4 PM (RR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.28; P = 0.051), getting a painful sunburn once (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.57; P = 0.073) and at least twice (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.82; P = 0.061), and wearing a shirt at the beach or pool rarely (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.54; P = 0.005), sometimes (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.57; P = 0.041), and often and always (RR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.54; P = 0.001) were associated with increased number of nevi. Identifying factors that predict the development of nevi will improve primary prevention efforts during early life.

A survey of skin cancer screening practices among dermatology nurses.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to survey the current level of participation dermatology nurses have in screening and skin cancer detection. SAMPLE: Nursing professionals including registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses and their Ontario, Canadian equivalents (registered practical nurses), advanced practice nurses, such as nurse practitioners and dermatology nurse practitioners, were included in the sample. RN education ranged from associate's to master's degree preparation. DATA ANALYSIS: Demographic, clinical setting, and practice information were reported using descriptive statistics and cross tabulations. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent (n = 89) of nurses surveyed are performing a total-body skin examination (TBSE); 15% (n = 16) are confident and 52% (n = 56) are very confident with their skills. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of nurses surveyed reported that they practiced skin cancer screening. They also reported using dermatologic tools, such as dermatoscope and digital camera. Nurses trained to perform TBSEs, as well as those who use dermatoscopes and digital cameras when performing TSBEs, provide an important component in improving cancer screening and detection.

Skin cancer coverage in a national newspaper: a teachable moment.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to (1) identify the number of published articles related to skin cancer in The New York Times newspaper from 1980-2004; (2) assess the content of the articles related to skin cancer, and (3) examine the trends in media coverage of skin cancer over time. METHODS: We performed a content analysis on articles related to skin cancer appearing in The New York Times during January 1, 1980, through December 31, 2004, using the ProQuest online content repository database and key words skin cancer. We conducted an advanced focus search of all "skin cancer" articles using key words "melanoma," "squamous cell carcinoma," "basal cell carcinoma," "sunscreen," "tanning," "sunbathing," and "tanning salon". RESULTS: We identified 874 published articles relating to skin cancer. Melanoma was the primary subject of the 874 articles, with 29% of the articles focusing on some aspect of melanoma. Coverage of other major subjects included sunscreen (11%), tanning (9%), basal cell carcinoma (7%), squamous cell carcinoma (3%), sunbathing (2%), and tanning salon (2%). The remaining 37% of articles contained some mention of skin cancer, but skin cancer was not the main topic nor were any of the focus terms. Over the 25-year period we examined, there was a slight upward trend in the number of skin-cancer-related articles, although we observed year-to-year variation. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how the print media portrays skin cancer issues provides valuable feedback for federal agencies and cancer organizations and may ultimately help promote skin cancer prevention and education.

Melanoma survivorship: research opportunities.

INTRODUCTION: The rising incidence and mortality rates of melanoma, the most fatal form of skin cancer, are among the greatest increases of all preventable cancers over the past decade. However, because of recent advances in early detection, secondary prevention efforts, and treatment, the number of melanoma survivors is increasing. Little research has been conducted on melanoma survivors and important opportunities exist for research in this understudied population. Here, we outline the important research opportunities related to the study of melanoma survivorship and summarize the paucity of literature currently available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed of the MEDLINE database of the National Library of Medicine from 1966-2005. The scope of the search was limited to those studies published in English. The search was conducted using the following MeSH headings: melanoma, neoplasms, skin neoplasms, survival, and survival rate. The reference lists of relevant book chapters and review articles were further reviewed, and printed materials from recent scientific meetings addressing this topic were obtained. RESULTS: Several factors that affect melanoma survivors warrant further study, including: physiologic long-term effects; psychosocial, behavioral, and cognitive factors; demographic characteristics; surveillance practices; recurrences, secondary primaries, and other cancers; family members of survivors; and economic issues, access to health care/life insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding recurrence and second primary cancer risk, psychosocial and cognitive characteristics, behaviors, surveillance patterns, economic sequelae, and family issues of melanoma survivors is important from a public health standpoint to promote the health and well-being of this cohort. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Melanoma is an understudied cancer, and the incidence and mortality of this disease are increasing. Describing the long term burden of this cancer and identifying factors that contribute to them will facilitate efforts to develop responsive secondary prevention strategies.