Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Depression and Anxiety in Elective Knee Surgery Patients.

Mental health has been shown to play an important role in patient-reported outcomes (PRO); however, there is a general lack of literature describing patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) depression and anxiety computer adaptive tests in elective knee surgery patients. The purpose of our study was to assess the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms before and after elective knee surgery and to determine whether these symptoms influence postoperative functional outcomes. An institutional review board-approved prospective orthopaedic registry was retrospectively queried for patients undergoing elective knee surgery from June 2015 to November 2018. Electronic surveys collecting patient demographic information and PROs were administered pre- and postoperatively. Of the 663 patients that completed baseline questionnaires, 466 completed 2-year follow-up (70.3%). PROs included PROMIS depression, PROMIS anxiety, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC), and PROMIS physical function (PF). Wilcoxon rank sum and Spearman's rank order correlation were utilized to determine associations between variables. Multivariable analysis was used to control for confounding variables. Average PROMIS depression and anxiety scores significantly improved 2 years after surgery. PROMIS depression and anxiety scores significantly correlated with each other. PROMIS depression and anxiety scores significantly correlated with PROMIS PF and IKDC scores. After controlling for confounders on multivariable analysis, worse 2-year PROMIS anxiety was predictive of less functional improvement and worse 2-year PF and IKDC, while worse 2-year PROMIS depression was predictive of less improvement in IKDC. This study confirms the important relationship between mental health and functional outcomes. Given that psychiatric comorbidities are potentially modifiable with treatment, proper recognition could potentially lead to better orthopaedic outcomes. In addition, the prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms postoperatively, as documented by PROMIS computer adaptive tests, may act as a barrier to achieving optimal functional outcomes after elective knee surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Preoperative Expectations in Hand Surgery Patients.

Introduction Studies have shown a link between patients' preoperative expectations and their postoperative satisfaction. However, limited studies exist concerning patient factors associated with higher preoperative expectations in the hand surgery population. This study analyzed preoperative expectation scores of patients undergoing hand surgery and aimed to determine associated patient characteristics. Materials and Methods A total of 418 elective hand surgery patients aged 15 years and older enrolled in a prospectively collected orthopaedic registry from June 2015 to December 2018 were analyzed. Patients were administered preoperative questionnaires including six Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System domains and other activity and pain scales. Expectation scores were measured using the six domains of the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management System expectations questionnaire. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of higher expectations. Results Overall, patients had high expectations (≥ 80.0) of their hand surgery. Higher mean expectation scores were seen with females, college graduates, better baseline health status, and fewer prior hand surgeries ( p < 0.05 for all). No significant associations were found among the Common Procedural Terminology codes and expectations. Multivariable analysis confirmed that college degree ( p = 0.023) and less pain ( p = 0.008) were predictive of higher baseline expectations. Conclusion In sum, more educated patients with less pain at baseline and better baseline health status have higher expectations of their hand surgery. Hand surgeons can use these results to help focus their preoperative counseling and expectation management.

Response Bias for Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery Surveys after Knee Surgery.

The Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) survey is an emerging tool used to capture patient satisfaction after elective surgery. Evaluating patient satisfaction is important; however, quality improvement (QI) surveys used to capture the patient experience may be subject to nonresponse bias. An orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent ambulatory knee surgery from June 2015 to December 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of PGAS survey nonresponse and response. In the cohort of 1,161 patients, 142 (12.2%) completed the PGAS survey. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that male sex, Black race, not living with a caretaker, student or unemployment status, and worse preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue were predictors of nonresponse. The results of this study highlight the presence of nonresponse bias in the PGAS survey after elective knee surgery.

Preoperative opioid use correlates with worse patient-reported outcomes two years after elective shoulder surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Prescription opioid consumption in the United States is a well-known public health problem, however, the deleterious effect of opioids may not be fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative opioid use and patient-reported outcomes two years after shoulder surgery. We hypothesized preoperative opioid use would be predictive of worse two-year patient reported outcome scores. METHODS: Patients undergoing shoulder surgery at an urban institution from June 2015 to July 2017 were prospectively enrolled into our orthopaedic registry. Preoperative opioid use and its association to patient outcome scores was retrospectively analyzed through bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis was used to control for confounding variables and to determine independent predictors of two-year outcome scores. RESULTS: Preoperative opioid use was associated with significantly worse scores on all two-year patient reported outcomes, and less improvement in PROMIS Physical Function and Numeric Pain Score (NPS) Body Pain two years postoperatively. Multivariate analysis showed preoperative opioid use to be an independent predictor of worse two-year scores in PROMIS Physical Function, PROMIS Pain Interference, PROMIS Social Satisfaction, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Form and NPS Operative Site. Preoperative opioid use was not an independent predictor of change in any outcome measure. CONCLUSION: Preoperative opioid use was associated with worse scores on all two-year patient reported outcomes, and after controlling for confounders, preoperative opioid use was predictive of worse scores in several two-year outcome measures. To our knowledge, this is one of the few studies investigating the impact of preoperative opioid use on postoperative outcomes after shoulder surgery.

Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine interscalene block versus continuous interscalene catheter in total shoulder arthroplasty: Opioid administration, pain scores, and complications.

INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the liposomal bupivacaine interscalene block (LBB) compared with continuous interscalene catheter block (CISB) in primary shoulder arthroplasty patients. METHODS: A prospective database was retrospectively queried over a 4-year period. RESULTS: LBB (n = 34) patients had lower opioid consumption and pain scores than CISB (n = 70), especially in opioid naïve patients. LBB patients were discharged with less opioids and had fewer revisits to the emergency department. CONCLUSION: Compared with CISB, LBB patients consume fewer opioids, have less pain, are discharged with less opioids, and have fewer revisits to the emergency department.