A 24-week multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab vs. fumaric acid esters and methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis naive to systemic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-17 antagonists have received a first-line label for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: We conducted the first head-to-head trial between the two most commonly used first-line therapies in Germany, fumaric acid esters (FAEs) and methotrexate, and the interleukin-17A antagonist, ixekizumab. METHODS: Systemic-naive patients were randomized in this parallel-group, active-comparator, open-label, rater-blinded trial (each group n = 54). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at 24 weeks. Key secondary outcomes included 24-week PASI 90 and 100, static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0 or 1. Safety events at week 24 were analysed using Fisher's exact test. Missing data were imputed using nonresponder imputation. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02634801) and EudraCT (2015-002649-69). RESULTS: At week 24, more ixekizumab-treated patients achieved PASI 75 [91% vs. 22% FAEs (P < 0·001) and 70% methotrexate (P = 0·014)], PASI 90 [80% vs. 9% FAEs (P < 0·001) and 39% methotrexate (P < 0·001)] and PASI 100 [41% vs. 4% FAEs (P < 0·001) and 13% methotrexate (P = 0·0041)], as well as sPGA (0,1) and DLQI (0,1). CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab was superior in inducing PASI 75/90/100, sPGA (0,1) and DLQI (0,1) responses at week 24 compared with methotrexate and FAEs. Safety profiles for all treatments were consistent with prior studies.

[Alzheimer dementia: course and burden on caregivers : Data over 18 months from German participants of the GERAS study]. / Alzheimer-Demenz: Verlauf und Belastung der Pflegepersonen : 18-Monats-Daten der deutschen Teilnehmer der GERAS-Studie.

The GERAS study is an international observational study with dementia patients of the Alzheimer type (AD) and their caregivers in everyday care. The 18-month data recorded in Germany are presented. Disease progression, medical and psychosocial consequences for both patients and caregivers were recorded using commonly used tests in clinical care: the mini mental status examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-Cog14), Alzheimer's disease cooperative study activities of daily living inventory (ADCS-ADL), neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI-12), resource utilization in dementia (RUD) and the Zarit burden interview (ZBI). Definition of AD severity level (MMSE): 21-26 mild (miAD), 15-20 moderate (moAD), <15 moderately severe to severe (m/sAD). For the 550 participants (mean age: 75.2 years, SD 7.6 years), miAD (41.5%), moAD (28.4%) and m/sAD (30.2%), the MMSE worsened: in miAD by -2.4 (CI -3.1/-1.7), in moAD by -3.9 (CI -5.0/-2.8) and in m/sAD by -2.5 (CI -3.5/-1.5) at 18 months and the ADAS-Cog14 by 6.2 (miAD-CI 4.6/7.8) and 7.1 points (moAD CI 3.9/10.3). Changes in overall ADCS-ADL amounted to -8.4 (CI -10.1/-6.2) for miAD, -12.9 (CI -15.3/-10.4) for moAD and -10.2 points (CI-12.8/-7.7) for m/sAD. Caregiver burden (NPI-12) rose in miAD by 1.2 points (CI -0.2/2.2), in moAD by 3.4 (CI 1.8/5.1) and in m/sAD by 1.5 points (CI 0.2/3.3). At study start, the total time required by caregivers (RUD) was 3.1 h/day (SD 5.4 h/day) for miAD, 6.6 (SD 7.5) for moAD and 12.7 (SD 9.3) for m/sAD. With 4.4 (SD 9.4) h/day, the increase after 18 months was highest in moAD. Caregiver burden (ZBI) increased most markedly in moAD with 7.2 (CI 4.2/9.7), 90.7% of the patients received antidementia drugs, while 26.6% received psychotropic medication.

Comparison of ixekizumab with ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: 24-week results from IXORA-S, a phase III study.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that the interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 axis is critical in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To present the primary end point (week 12) and safety and efficacy data up to week 24 from a head-to-head trial (IXORA-S) of the IL-17A inhibitor ixekizumab (IXE) vs. the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab (UST). METHODS: Randomized patients received IXE (160-mg starting dose, then 80 mg every 2 weeks for 12 weeks, then 80 mg every 4 weeks, n = 136) or UST (45 mg or 90 mg weight-based dosing per label, n = 166). The primary end point was the proportion of patients reaching ≥ 90% Psoriasis Area and Severity Index improvement (PASI 90). Hommel-adjusted key secondary end points at week 12 included PASI 75, PASI 100, static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1, sPGA score of 0, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0 or 1, ≥ 4-point reduction on the itch numerical rating scale (NRS) and changes in itch NRS and skin pain visual analogue scale. RESULTS: At week 12, IXE (n = 99, 72·8%) was superior to UST (n = 70, 42·2%) in PASI 90 response (response difference 32·1%, 97·5% confidence interval 19·8-44·5%, P < 0·001). Response rates for PASI 75, PASI 100 and sPGA (0,1) were significantly higher for IXE than for UST (adjusted P < 0·05). At week 24, IXE-treated patients had significantly higher response rates than UST-treated patients for PASI, sPGA and DLQI (unadjusted P < 0·05). No deaths were reported, and the treatments did not differ with regard to overall incidences of adverse events (P = 0·299). CONCLUSIONS: The superior efficacy of IXE demonstrated at week 12 persisted up to week 24. The safety profiles were consistent with those previously reported for both treatments.

Continuation and effectiveness of tadalafil once daily during a 6-month observational study in erectile dysfunction: the EDATE study.

AIMS: This was the first observational study evaluating treatment continuation, effectiveness and tolerability of tadalafil 5 mg once daily (TAD-OaD) in patients who chose and paid for treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Men ≥ 18 years with ED, treated previously with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5)-inhibitor on-demand (PRN) or treatment-naïve, were enrolled at 59 sites. For patients prescribed TAD-OaD at baseline (T1), change in erectile function (IIEF-EF and GAQ) was documented after 1-3 (T2) and 4-6 (T3) months. The primary outcome was the probability to switch/discontinue from TAD-OaD, estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method. Changes in IIEF-EF were evaluated using a mixed model for repeated measures adjusting for patient baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Of 975 men enrolled (median age 56.8 years, 33.7% with previous PDE5-inhibitor use), 778 were prescribed TAD-OaD, 135 TAD-PRN and 62 sildenafil or vardenafil PRN. During the 6-month longitudinal observation, 107 patients (13.8% of 778) switched or discontinued TAD-OaD-treatment. KM-rates (95%CI) for continuing TAD-OaD at 2, 4 and 6 months were 94.0% (92.3, 95.7), 88.3% (85.9, 90.6) and 86.3% (83.7, 88.9), respectively. The 25th percentile of time to switch/discontinuation of TAD-OaD was estimated as 31.1 weeks (lower 95%CI 30.3 weeks). At T3, IIEF-EF scores had increased by 7.1 (LSmean; 95%CI 5.8, 8.5) points; 91.3% of patients reported improved erections. The most frequently reported AE was headache (10 patients; 1.3%); no new/unexpected safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION: Under routine conditions, and when patients were involved in treatment decision-making, more than 86% of men starting/switching to tadalafil once daily (OaD) at baseline continued tadalafil OaD treatment for ≥ 6 months.

Psychosocial outcomes after initial treatment of erectile dysfunction with tadalafil once daily, tadalafil on demand or sildenafil citrate on demand: results from a randomized, open-label study.

Initiation of ED treatment with a particular PDE5I may influence treatment-adherence and other outcomes. In this multicenter, open-label study, men with ED, naïve to PDE5I, were randomized to tadalafil 5 mg once-a-day (OaD; N=257), 10 mg on demand (PRN; N = 252) or sildenafil-citrate (sildenafil) 50 mg PRN (N = 261) for 8 weeks (dose adjustments allowed), followed by 16 weeks of pragmatic treatment (switching between PDE5I allowed). Primary outcomes (treatment-adherence) were reported previously. Here, we report effects on: Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales, Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire, ED Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) and Global Assessment Questions (GAQ). Mixed-model for repeated measures and analysis of covariance were used to analyze changes from baseline; GAQ-responses were evaluated by logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for treatment, country, ED-severity, baseline and baseline-by-treatment interaction. Patients randomized to tadalafil OaD or PRN reported greater improvement (least-square mean (s.e.) change) in Sexual Self-Confidence (OaD +0.90 (0.048), PRN +0.93 (0.050), vs +0.73 (0.049); P=0.006 and P=0.001) and Spontaneity (OaD +0.11 (0.035), PRN +0.13 (0.035), vs +0.02 (0.035); P = 0.044 and P = 0.010) compared with sildenafil. Improvements in GAQ and SEP responses, IIEF-EF, orgasmic function, sexual desire, overall satisfaction domains, SEAR and EDITS scores did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

Transferring from clopidogrel loading dose to prasugrel loading dose in acute coronary syndrome patients. High on-treatment platelet reactivity analysis of the TRIPLET trial.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) has been identified as an independent risk factor for ischaemic events. The randomised, double-blind, TRIPLET trial included a pre-defined comparison of HPR in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) following a placebo/600-mg clopidogrel loading dose (LD) immediately before a subsequent prasugrel 60-mg or 30-mg LD. Platelet reactivity was assessed using the VerifyNow® P2Y12 assay (P2Y12 Reaction Units, PRU) within 24 hours (h) following the placebo/clopidogrel LD (immediately prior to prasugrel LD), and at 2, 6, 24, 72 h following prasugrel LDs. The impact of CYP2C19 predicted metaboliser phenotype (extensive metabolisers [EM] and reduced metabolisers [RM]) on HPR status was also assessed. HPR (PRU ≥240) following the clopidogrel LD (prior to the prasugrel LD) was 58.5% in the combined clopidogrel LD groups. No significant difference was noted when stratified by time between the clopidogrel and prasugrel LDs (≤6 hs vs>6 h). At 6 h following the 2nd loading dose in the combined prasugrel LD groups, HPR was 7.1%, with 0% HPR by 72 h. There was no significant effect of CYP2C19 genotype on pharmacodynamic (PD) response following either prasugrel LD treatments at any time point, regardless of whether it was preceded by a clopidogrel 600-mg LD. In conclusion, in this study, patients with ACS intended for PCI showed a high prevalence of HPR after clopidogrel 600-mg LD regardless of metaboliser status. When prasugrel LD was added, HPR decreased substantially by 6 h, and was not seen by 72 h.