RESUMO
Objective: A novel simulator developed to offer hands-on practice for the stapled side-to-side cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was tested previously in a single-center study that supported its value in surgical education. This multi-institutional trial was undertaken to evaluate validity evidence from 6 independent thoracic surgery residency programs. Methods: After a virtual session for simulation leaders, learners viewed a narrated video of the procedure and then alternated as surgeon or first assistant. Using an online survey, perceived value was measured across fidelity domains: physical attributes, realism of materials, realism of experience, value, and relevance. Objective assessment included time, number of sutures tearing, bubble test, and direct inspection. Comparison across programs was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Surveys were completed by 63 participants as surgeons (17 junior and 20 senior residents, 18 fellows, and 8 faculty). For 3 of 5 tasks, mean ratings of 4.35 to 4.44 correlated with "somewhat easy" to "very easy" to perform. The interrupted outer layer of the anastomosis rated lowest, suggesting this task was the most difficult. The simulator was rated as a highly valuable training tool. For the objective measurements of performance, "direct inspection" rated highest followed by "time." A total of 90.5% of participants rated the simulator as ready for use with only minor improvements. Conclusions: Results from this multi-institutional study suggest the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis simulator is a useful adjunct for training and assessment. Further research is needed to determine its value in assessing competence for independent operating and associations between improved measured performance and clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: At least partially technically related, a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis has a 12% to 14% leak rate, which is theoretically reducible with simulator practice. Preliminary development and testing of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis simulator are described. METHODS: A portable, low-cost, scale reproduction of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis operative site was engineered around a 19 × 11 × 6-cm plastic box. Silicone "esophageal" and "gastric tip" castings permitted construction of a stapled side-to-side cervical esophagogastric anastomosis guided by an illustrated curriculum. In a 2-phase pilot study, the simulator and curriculum were evaluated. Phase 1: Seven faculty evaluated fidelity using a 5-point, 24-item survey of (1) physical attributes, (2) realism of materials, (3) realism of experience, (4) value, and (5) relevance, and (6) ability to perform tasks. Overall impression of the simulator was also measured. Phase 2: Eight thoracic surgical trainees similarly evaluated the simulator and the quality of the curriculum. Faculty and trainee ratings were compared using a Rasch model, and inter-rater agreement was estimated. RESULTS: There were no overall fidelity differences across faculty and resident ratings. Combined observed averages ranged from 4.52 (Realism of Materials) to 5.00 (Relevance). Lifelike feel of esophagus had the lowest ratings (observed average = 4.40). Residents rated interrupted outer layer of anterior closure to be more difficult (observed average = 4.13) than faculty (observed average = 4.86; P = .016, d = 1.99). Global ratings (observed average = 3.33/4.00) indicated participants believed the simulator could be used for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis training now, but could be improved slightly. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary evidence suggests the novel cervical esophagogastric anastomosis simulator is valuable as a surgical training tool.
