Comparing Visual Outcomes of Light Adjustable Intraocular Lenses in Patients With and Without Prior History of Corneal Refractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess visual outcomes of light adjustable intraocular lens (LAL; Calhoun Vision, Inc) implantation after cataract extraction in patients with a history of corneal refractive surgery. METHODS: The records of patients who received LALs with and without a history of corneal refractive surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Data for 51 eyes (30 patients) with a history of corneal refractive surgery and 52 eyes (44 patients) without refractive surgery were analyzed. A total of 36 eyes of patients with and 43 eyes of patients without a history of corneal refractive surgery had 12-month follow-up data available. The primary outcomes evaluated were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). RESULTS: At 12 months, 31% of eyes with a history of corneal refractive surgery had a UDVA of 20/20 or better and 97% of eyes were 20/40 or better. In contrast, 63% of patients with no history of corneal refractive surgery had 20/20 UDVA or better at 12 months and 100% were 20/40 or better. Of patients with a history of corneal refractive surgery, 55% and 83% of eyes at 12 months were within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopters, respectively, of the target refraction compared to 89% and 96% of eyes without a history of corneal refractive surgery. CONCLUSIONS: LALs are a promising platform for achieving excellent visual outcomes following cataract surgery. Patients with a prior history of corneal refractive surgery can achieve excellent visual outcomes with the LAL. However, this study found that patients with a history of corneal refractive surgery demonstrated less predictable visual acuity outcomes when compared to patients without a history of corneal refractive surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(5):311-318.].

Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays and New Developments.

Presbyopia may represent the largest segment of refractive errors that is without an established and effective refractive surgery treatment. Corneal Inlays are materials (synthetic or allogenic) implanted in the stroma of patients' corneas to improve presbyopia. These inlays, introduced into the United States in 2015 via the small-aperture corneal inlay (KAMRATM, SightLife Surgical/CorneaGen, Seattle, Washington, United States), were met with an initial wave of enthusiasm. Subsequent models like the shape-changing corneal inlay (RAINDROPTM, Revision Optics, Lake Forest, California, United States) offered excellent results for patients, but longer-term research raised questions about patient safety. At the time of this article, no synthetic corneal inlays are available in the United States for the correction of presbyopia. Other options for presbyopia correction include allograft corneal inlays, trifocal synthetic corneal inlays, pharmacologic therapies, scleral incisions or additive techniques and PresbyLASIK. Presently, allograft inlays consist of corneal lenticules removed from patients undergoing Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). We will review corneal inlays and other alternative procedures that may provide effective and predictable treatments for patients with presbyopia.

Polymicrobial anaerobic infection with a deep abscess in the supraspinous fossa following a subacromial corticosteroid injection.

In September 2015, a male aged 61 years with poorly controlled diabetes (his only medical problem) had left shoulder surgery that included an arthroscopic acromioplasty with debridement of suture material from a rotator cuff repair done 10 years prior. A subacromial corticosteroid injection was given 7 months later for pain and reduced motion. Three weeks later a fulminate infection was evident. Cultures grew Propionibacterium acnes Treatment included two arthroscopic debridement surgeries and 8 weeks of intravenous antibiotics (primarily daptomycin). Eight weeks after the cessation of the antibiotics, purulence recurred and tissue cultures then grew Staphylococcus epidermidis Several additional surgeries were needed to control the infection. We failed to recognise that an abscess that extended from the subacromial space across the entire supraspinous fossa. We report this case to alert clinicians that a seemingly innocuous subacromial corticosteroid injection can lead to an atypical infection and also extend into the supraspinous fossa.

Upper Extremity Compartment Syndrome in a Patient with Acute Gout Attack but without Trauma or Other Typical Causes.

We report the case of a 30-year-old Polynesian male with a severe gout flare of multiple joints and simultaneous acute compartment syndrome (ACS) of his right forearm and hand without trauma or other typical causes. He had a long history of gout flares, but none were known to be associated with compartment syndrome. He also had concurrent infections in his right elbow joint and olecranon bursa. A few days prior to this episode of ACS, high pain and swelling occurred in his right upper extremity after a minimal workout with light weights. A similar episode occurred seven months prior and was attributed to a gout flare. Unlike past flares that resolved with colchicine and/or anti-inflammatory medications, his current upper extremity pain/swelling worsened and became severe. Hand and forearm fasciotomies were performed. Workup included general medicine, rheumatology and infectious disease consultations, myriad blood tests, and imaging studies including Doppler ultrasound and CT angiography. Additional clinical history suggested that he had previously unrecognized recurrent exertional compartment syndrome that led to the episode of ACS reported here. Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) presents a difficult diagnosis when presented with multiple symptoms concurrently. This case provides an example of one such diagnosis.