Osteoporosis and cement usage in total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Cement usage in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasingly common. However, osteoporosis-related fracture risk in cemented vs uncemented THA patients is poorly characterized. We aim to analyze the usage of metabolic bone care and osteoporosis fracture risk in cemented vs uncemented THA patients using FRAX and radiographic bone measurements. METHODS: Chart review on 250 THA patients was performed retrospectively. Demographics, FRAX scores, hip radiograph measurements, osteoporosis diagnosis, treatment and screening were compared between cemented and uncemented THA patients. Logistic regression model was used to analyze factors influencing cement usage. RESULTS: Cemented THA patients have significantly higher osteoporosis-related fracture risk as measured by FRAX major (20% vs 13%) and FRAX hip (8% vs 5%). There is no significant difference in osteoporosis treatment, vitamin D / calcium supplementation, or metabolic bone disease screening based on patients' cement status. Female sex and rheumatoid arthritis status significantly predict cement usage, but FRAX scores do not predict cement usage. Additionally, 50% (10/20) of patients with Dorr C classification were uncemented. CONCLUSION: Although some patients undergoing THA with high osteoporosis-related fracture risk were identified and cemented, some risk factors including poor proximal femur shape (by Dorr classification) and poor bone quality (as measured by FRAX score) were potentially overlooked. Cemented patients had an increased risk for fractures but did not receive appropriately increased osteoporosis screening or treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Scores and Radiographical Bone Measurements in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients but is not routinely screened for in this population. Given the availability of hip x-rays and preoperative screenings, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores and radiographic bone measurements are potentially promising, novel risk stratification tools. This study aims to characterize FRAX scores and radiographic bone measurements in THA and PPFx patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review for demographic variables and FRAX scores was performed on 250 THA and 40 PPFx patients. Radiographic bone measurements including cortical thicknesses (both antero-posterior [AP] and lateral), canal to calcar ratio, canal flare index, and Dorr classifications were obtained from preoperative x-rays. Correlation between FRAX scores and radiographic bone measurements was investigated with linear regressions. FRAX scores and radiographic bone measurements were compared between the THA and PPFx patients. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors predicting PPFx. RESULTS: FRAX scores were significantly correlated with both AP (P < .001) and lateral (P = .007) cortical thicknesses. Compared to THA patients, those with PPFx had significantly higher FRAX scores (P = .003) and lower AP cortical thickness (P = .005). Multivariate logistic regressions demonstrated that FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk score and AP cortical thickness were independent predictors of PPFx (P = .001 and .024, respectively). CONCLUSION: Cortical thicknesses are good proxy measurements of osteoporosis-related fracture risk in THA patients. In addition, both major and AP cortical thickness indices are promising tools for identifying patients who are at a high risk of PPFx in the THA population.