Blood Transfusion in the Age of Tranexamic Acid: Who Needs a Type and Screen Before Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Modern surgical protocols, particularly the use of tranexamic acid (TXA), have reduced, but not eliminated, blood transfusions surrounding total hip arthroplasty (THA). Identifying patients at risk for transfusion remains important for risk reduction and to determine type and screen testing. METHODS: We reviewed 6,405 patients who underwent primary, unilateral THA between January 2014 and January 2023 at a single academic institution, received TXA, and had preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) values. We compared demographics, baseline hemoglobin levels, and surgical details between patients who were and were not transfused. Data were analyzed utilizing multivariate regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: The overall perioperative and intraoperative transfusion rates were 3.4 and 1.0%, respectively. Patients who were older, women, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class >II demonstrated an increased risk of transfusion. Risk of transfusion demonstrated an inverse correlation with preoperative Hgb levels, a bimodal association with Body Mass Index (BMI), and a direct correlation with age, surgical time, and estimated blood loss on multivariate analysis. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated a preoperative Hgb cutoff of 12 g/dL for predicting any transfusion. Above the threshold of 12 g/dL, total and intraoperative transfusions were rare, with rates of 1.7 and 0.3%, respectively. Total and intraoperative transfusion rates with Hgb between 11 and 12 g/dL were 14.3 and 4.6%, respectively. Below 11 g/dL, total and intraoperative transfusion rates were 27.5 and 10.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the age of TXA, blood transfusion is rare in THA when preoperative Hgb is > 12 g/dL, challenging the need for universal type and screening. Conversely, patients who have hemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL, remain at substantial risk for transfusion. Between hemoglobin 11 and 12 g/dL, patient age, sex, BMI, ASA classification, anticipated estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time may help predict transfusion risk and the need for a perioperative type and screen.

Does Surgical Approach Affect Dislocation Rate After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion? A Retrospective Analysis of 16,223 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) is a risk factor for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The effect of the surgical approach on this association has not been investigated. This study examined the association between the surgical approach and dislocation following THA in patients who had prior LSF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16,223 primary elective THAs at our institution from June 2011 to September 2022. Patients who had LSF prior to THA were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients were stratified by LSF history, surgical approach, and intraoperative robot or navigation use to compare dislocation rates. There were 8,962 (55.2%) posterior, 5,971 (36.8%) anterior, and 1,290 (8.0%) laterally based THAs. Prior LSF was identified in 323 patients (2.0%). Binary logistic regressions were used to assess the association of patient factors with dislocation risk. RESULTS: There were 177 dislocations identified in total (1.1%). In nonadjusted analyses, the dislocation rate was significantly higher following the posterior approach among all patients (P = .003). Prior LSF was associated with a significantly higher dislocation rate in all patients (P < .001) and within the posterior (P < .001), but not the anterior approach (P = .514) subgroups. Multivariate regressions demonstrated anterior (OR [odds ratio] = 0.64, 95% CI [confidence interval] 0.45 to 0.91, P = .013), and laterally based (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, P = .039) approaches were associated with decreased dislocation risk, whereas prior LSF (OR = 4.28, 95% CI 2.38 to 7.69, P < .001) was associated with increased dislocation risk. Intraoperative technology utilization was not significantly associated with dislocation in the multivariate regressions (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.06, P = .095). CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirmed that LSF is a significant risk factor for dislocation following THA; however, anterior and laterally based approaches may mitigate dislocation risk in this population. In multivariate analyses, including surgical approach, LSF, and several perioperative variables, intraoperative technology utilization was not found to be significantly associated with dislocation risk.

"Stuck in the middle": the missing lumbosacral link in total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Spinopelvic mobility drives functional acetabular position, influencing dislocation risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients have been described as "stuck sitting" or "stuck standing" based on pelvic tilt (PT). We hypothesised that some patients are "stuck in the middle," meaning their PT changes minimally from sitting to standing - increasing their risk of dislocation. METHODS: We reviewed 195 patients with standing and sitting whole body radiographs prior to THA. Standing anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPT) and standing and sitting sacral slope (SS) were measured and used to calculate sitting APPT. Normal standing and sitting were defined as APPT >-10° and <-20°, respectively. Spinal stiffness was classified as <10° change in sacral slope between sitting and standing. Patients were categorised as: (A) able to fully sit and stand; (B) "stuck sitting" - able to fully sit; unable to fully stand; (C) "stuck standing" - able to fully stand; unable to fully sit; or (D) "stuck in the middle" - unable to sit or stand fully. RESULTS: 84 patients could sit and stand normally (A), 22 patients were stuck sitting (B), 76 patients were stuck standing (C), and 13 patients were stuck in the middle (D). While 111 patients (56.9%) were considered stuck, only 58 patients (29.7%) met criteria for spinal stiffness. DISCUSSION: We identified a subset of patients with stiff spines and abnormal PT in both sitting and standing, including 37.1% of patients who would be classified as "stuck sitting" based only on standing radiographs. Placing acetabular components in less than anatomic anteversion in these patients may increase posterior dislocation risk.

Proximal radiolucent lines around fully hydroxyapatite-coated tapered femoral stems: should we be concerned?

INTRODUCTION: Radiolucent lines occasionally develop around the proximal aspect of fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated tapered femoral stems after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It was hypothesised that distal wedging of stems may predispose to proximal radiolucent line formation, which may negatively impact clinical outcome. METHODS: All primary THA performed with a collarless fully HA-coated stem that had a minimum of 1 year of radiographic follow-up were identified in a surgical database (n = 244). Radiographic measures of proximal femoral morphology and femoral canal fill at the middle and distal thirds of the stem were analysed for association with the presence of proximal radiolucent lines. Linear regression was used to explore any association between radiolucent lines and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), available in 61% of patients. RESULTS: Proximal radiolucent lines developed in 31 cases (12.7%) at final follow-up. Dorr A femoral morphology and increased canal-fill at the distal ⅓ of the stem correlated with the development of radiolucent lines (p < 0.001). No correlation was observed between pain or PROMs and the presence of proximal radiolucent lines. DISCUSSION: We observed an unexpectedly high incidence of proximal femoral radiolucent lines about collarless fully HA coated stems. Distal-only implant wedging in Dorr A bone may compromise proximal fixation. Although this finding did not correlate with short-term outcomes, the long-term clinical impact requires further study.

Comparison of canal fill and radiolucent line formation between two fully coated, hydroxyapatite tapered stems: a 2-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Comparison between fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stems with differing geometry are lacking in the total hip arthroplasty (THA) literature. This study aimed to compare femoral canal fill, radiolucency formation, and 2-year implant survivorship between two commonly used, HA-coated stems. METHODS: All primary THAs performed with two fully HA-coated stems (Polar stem, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, TN and Corail stem, DePuy-Synthes, Warsaw, IN) with a minimum 2-year radiographic follow-up were identified. Radiographic measures of proximal femoral morphology based on the Dorr classification and femoral canal fill were analyzed. Radiolucent lines were identified by Gruen zone. Perioperative characteristics and 2-year survivorship were compared between stem types. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients were identified with 132 (56.7%) receiving the Polar stem (P) and 101 (43.3%) receiving the Corail stem (C). No differences were observed with respect to proximal femoral morphology. Femoral stem canal fill at the middle third of the stem was greater for P stem patients than for C stem patients (P stem; 0.80 ± 0.08 vs. C stem; 0.77 ± 0.08, p = 0.002), while femoral stem canal fill at the distal third of the stem and presence of subsidence were comparable between groups. A total of six and nine radiolucencies were observed in P stem and C stem patients, respectively. Revision rate at 2-year (P stem; 1.5% vs C stem; 0.0%, p = 0.51) and latest follow-up (P stem; 1.5% vs C stem; 1.0%, p = 0.72) did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Greater canal fill at the middle third of the stem was observed for the P stem compared to the C stem, however, both stems demonstrated robust and comparable freedom from revision at 2-year and latest follow-up, with low incidences of radiolucent line formation. Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes for these commonly used, fully HA-coated stems remain equally promising in THA despite variations in canal fill.

Lower Rates of Femoral Fracture and Subsidence with a Morphometric Stem in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: A "morphometric" tapered femoral stem with size-specific medial curvatures and proportional neck lengths was introduced, attempting to improve fixation and biomechanics in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) across a range of femoral sizes and morphotypes. We investigated whether this design reduced complications and better restored anatomy (e.g., limb length and offset) compared to a traditional tapered stem with consistent neck lengths across sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 389 THAs (340 patients) performed using either of two cementless femoral implants. Records were reviewed for demographics, surgical details, complications, and reoperations. Radiographs were examined for subsidence, biologic fixation, leg lengths, offset, and proximal femoral morphology. RESULTS: The intraoperative fracture rate was lower with this morphometric stem compared to this traditional stem (0 vs. 3.4%), as was the incidence of postoperative subsidence ≥3mm (4.7 vs. 19.2%). With the numbers available, no differences were identified regarding rates of reoperation for periprosthetic femur fracture (0 vs. 1.0%) and femoral fixation failure without fracture (1.1 vs. 0%), or all-cause reoperations (2.7 vs. 2.4%). Limb length and offset restoration were similar with the two implants, but the shortest available femoral head was used less frequently with this morphometric stem compared to this traditional stem (22 vs. 54%). CONCLUSIONS: This morphometric stem was associated with decreased rates of intraoperative fracture and postoperative subsidence, along with decreased use of the shortest available head. Nevertheless, both implants demonstrated clinical success, allowing reconstruction of limb length and offset with low rates of femoral fixation failure.

Calibration of magnification in two-dimensional low-dose full-body imaging for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using two-dimensional low-dose (2DLD) full-body imaging has gained popularity in recent years. The low-dose imaging system is said to produce a calibrated image with constant 1:1 magnification. However, the planning software used in conjunction with those images may introduce variations in the degree of magnification in 2DLD imaging, and this has not yet been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to quantify any variation in 2DLD image to assess the need for image calibration when using conventional planning software. METHODS: Postoperative 2DLD images from 137 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Only patients who underwent THA for primary osteoarthritis were included in the study cohort. The femoral head diameter was measured by two independent observers using both Orthoview™ and TraumaCad™ planning software programs. Actual sizes of the femoral head implants were extracted from surgical reports to calculate image magnification. Magnification measurement reliability was calculated with the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) index. RESULTS: Image magnification varied among cases (mean 133%, range 129-135%). There was no statistical difference in mean image magnification among the various implant sizes (p = 0.8). Mean observer and inter-observer reliability was rated excellent. CONCLUSION: THA planning with 2DLD imaging is subject to variation in magnification as analyzed with conventional planning software in this series. This finding is of paramount importance for surgeons using 2DLD imaging in preparation for THA since errors in magnification could affect the accuracy of preoperative planning and ultimately the clinical outcome.

Creating Consensus in the Definition of Spinopelvic Mobility.

INTRODUCTION: The term "spinopelvic mobility" is most often applied to motion within the spinopelvic segment. It has also been used to describe changes in pelvic tilt between various functional positions, which is influenced by motion at the hip, knee, ankle and spinopelvic segment. In the interest of establishing a consistent language for spinopelvic mobility, we sought to clarify and simplify its definition to create consensus, improve communication, and increase consistency with research into the hip-spine relationship. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the Medline (PubMed) library to identify all existing articles pertaining to spinopelvic mobility. We reported on the varying definitions of spinopelvic mobility including how different radiographic imaging techniques are used to define mobility. RESULTS: The search term "spinopelvic mobility" returned a total of 72 articles. The frequency and context for the varying definitions of mobility were reported. 41 papers used standing and upright relaxed-seated radiographs without the use of extreme positioning, and 17 papers discussed the use of extreme positioning to define spinopelvic mobility. DISCUSSION: Our review suggests that the definitions of spinopelvic mobility is not consistent in the majority of published literature. We suggest descriptions of spinopelvic mobility independently consider spinal motion, hip motion, and pelvic position, while recognizing and describing their interdependence.

Selective Use of Dual-Mobility Did Not Significantly Reduce 90-Day Readmissions or Reoperations After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Selective use of dual mobility (DM) implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients at high dislocation risk has been proposed. However, evidence-based utilization thresholds have not been defined. We explored whether surgeon-specific rates of DM utilization correlate with rates of readmission and reoperation for dislocation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 14,818 primary THA procedures performed at a single institution between 2011 and 2021, including 14,310 fixed-bearing (FB) and 508 DM implant constructs. Outcomes including 90-day readmissions and reoperations were compared between patients who had FB and DM implants. Cases were then stratified into 3 groups based on the attending surgeon's rate of DM utilization (≤ 1, 1 to 10, or > 10%) and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were no differences in 90-day outcomes between FB and DM implant groups. Surgeon frequency of DM utilization ranged from 0% to 43%. There were 48 surgeons (73%) who used DM in ≤ 1% of cases, 11 (17%) in 1% to 10% of cases, and 7 (10%) in > 10% of cases. The 90-day rates of readmission (7.3% versus 7.6% versus 7.2%, P = .7) and reoperation (3.4% versus 3.9% versus 3.8%, P = .3), as well as readmission for instability (0.5% versus 0.6% versus 0.8%, P = .2) and reoperation for instability (0.5% versus 0.5% versus 0.8%, P = .6), did not statistically differ between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Selective DM utilization did not reduce 90-day readmissions or reoperations following primary THA. Other dislocation-mitigation strategies (ie, surgical approach, computer navigation, robotic assistance, and large diameter FBs) may have masked any benefits of selective DM use.

Impact of revision TKA indications on resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: Indications for surgery may impact resource utilization in aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), and understanding these relationships would facilitate risk-stratification preoperatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of rTKA indications on readmission, reoperation, length of stay (LOS), and cost. METHODS: We reviewed all 962 patients who underwent aseptic rTKA at an academic orthopedic specialty hospital between June 2011-April 2020 with at least 90 days of follow-up. Patients were categorized based on their indication for aseptic rTKA as listed in the operative report. Demographics, surgical factors, LOS, readmission, reoperation and cost were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: There were significant differences in operative time among cohorts (p < 0.001), highest among the periprosthetic fracture group (164.2 ± 59.8 min). Reoperation rate was greatest in the extensor mechanism disruption cohort (50.0 %, p = 0.009). Total cost differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), which was highest among the implant failure cohort (134.6 % of mean) and lowest for component malpositioning cohort (90.2 % of mean). Similarly, there were significant differences in direct cost (p < 0.001) which was highest in the periprosthetic fracture cohort (138.5 % of mean), and lowest in the implant failure cohort (90.5 % of mean). There were no differences in discharge disposition, or number of re-revisions among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Operative time, components revised, LOS, readmissions, reoperation rate, total cost and direct cost following aseptic rTKA varied significantly between different revision indications. These differences should be noted for preoperative planning, resource allocation, scheduling, and risk-stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective observational analysis.

Consideration of pelvic tilt at the time of preoperative planning improves standing acetabular position after robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately half of dislocating total hip arthroplasties (THAs) demonstrate acetabular component position within traditional safe zones. It is unclear if postoperative functional acetabular position can be reliably improved by considering preoperative pelvic tilt. We investigated whether standing cup position targets could be more accurately achieved by considering preoperative standing pelvic tilt in addition to bone landmarks when planning for robot-assisted THA. METHODS: We reviewed 146 THAs performed by a single surgeon using computed tomography-based 3-dimensional planning and robotic technology to guide acetabular reaming and component insertion. Planning for 73 consecutive cases started at 40° of inclination and 22° of anteversion relative to the supine functional plane and was adjusted to better match native hip anatomy. Planning for the next 73 cases was modified to consider standing pelvic position based on standing preoperative radiographs. We compared groups to determine the rate when cups were placed outside our standing targets of 15-30° anteversion and 35-50° inclination. RESULTS: Cup position proved to be reliable in both groups, with 83% of cups in the anatomic planning cohort and 90% of cups in the functional planning cohort achieving standing targets for both anteversion and inclination (p = 0.227). Variances were lower in the functional planning group: 9.4° versus 15.8° of inclination (p = 0.079) and 18.3° versus 26.1° of anteversion (p = 0.352). The range of functional positions was narrower in the functional planning group: 35.7-47.5° versus 31.8-54.9° of inclination and 16.7-35.0° versus 10.1-35.9° of anteversion. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest enhanced planning that considers pelvic tilt, when coupled to a precision tool to achieve the plan, can reliably achieve target standing component positions. Considering preoperative functional pelvic position may improve postoperative functional acetabular component placement in THA, but the clinical benefit of this has yet to be confirmed.

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with lumbar spinal fusion leads to significant changes in pelvic tilt and sacral slope.

BACKGROUND: The knee-hip-spine syndrome has been well elucidated in the literature in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on spinopelvic sagittal alignment in patients with and without pre-TKA lumber spinal fusion. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 113 patients who underwent TKA for primary osteoarthritis. Patients were stratified into the following three groups: (1) patients who had pre-TKA spinal fusion (SF, n = 19), (2) patients who had no spinal fusion but experienced pre-TKA flexion contracture (FC, n = 20), and (3) patients without flexion contracture or spinal fusion before TKA (no SF/FC, n = 74). Spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters, including pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and plumb line-sacrum distance (SVA) were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively on lateral standing full-body low-dose images. RESULTS: TKA resulted in significant pre- to postoperative changes in pelvic tilt (average ∆ PT = - 8.6°, p = 0.018) and sacral slope (average ∆ SS = 8.6°, p = 0.037) in the spinal fusion (SF) group. Non-significant changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment parameters (PT, SS, LL, TK, SVA) were noted postoperatively in all patients in the FC and the no SF/FC groups. CONCLUSIONS: TKA can lead to meaningful changes in spinopelvic alignment in patients with prior lumbar fusion compared to those without spinal fusion. Patients with spinal fusion who are candidates for both hip and knee replacements should consider undergoing TKA first since changes in spinopelvic sagittal alignment can increase the risk of future complications. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Effect of Pelvic Sagittal Tilt and Axial Rotation on Functional Acetabular Orientation.

Accurate and reproducible acetabular component positioning is among the most important technical factors affecting outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. Although several studies have investigated the influence of pelvic tilt and obliquity on functional acetabular anteversion, the effect of pelvic axial rotation has not yet been established. We analyzed a generic simulated pelvis created using preoperative full-body standing and sitting radiographs. A virtual acetabulum was placed in 144 different scenarios of acetabular anteversion and abduction angles. In each scenario, the effects of pelvic tilt and pelvic axial rotation on different combinations of acetabular orientations were assessed. The change in acetabular anteversion was 0.75° for each 1° of pelvic tilt and was most linear in abduction angles of 40°±45°. The change in acetabular anteversion was 0.8° for each 1° of pelvic axial rotation. Surgeons may consider adjusting acetabular anteversion in fixed axial pelvic deformities when the degree of deformity affects functional acetabular positioning, assessed from preoperative standing and sitting weight-bearing radiographs. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(1):e27-e30.].

A New Classification System for Cementless Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The growing variety of total hip arthroplasty implants necessitates a standardized, simple, and brand-neutral language to precisely classify femoral components. Although previous classifications have been useful, they need updating to include stems that have current surface treatment technologies, modularity, collar features, and other geometric characteristics. METHODS: To accomplish this, we propose a new classification system for stems based on 3 distinguishing stem features: (1) geometry, (2) location of modularity, and (3) length. RESULTS: Our system allows for the easy classification of all currently used stem types. CONCLUSIONS: One goal of this endeavor is to improve clinical record keeping to facilitate study comparisons as well as literature reviews.

Dual-mobility versus Fixed-bearing in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Outcome Comparison.

Purpose: Use of dual mobility (DM) articulations can reduce the risk of instability in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Knowledge regarding the impact of this design on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is limited. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between DM and fixed bearing (FB) prostheses following primary THA. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent primary THA between 2011-2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were separated into three cohorts: FB vs monoblock-D vs modular-DM. An evaluation of PROMs including HOOS, JR, and FJS-12, as well as discharge-disposition, 90-day readmissions, and revisions rates was performed. Propensity-score matching was performed to limit significant demographic differences, while ANOVA and chi-squared test were used for comparison of outcomes. Results: Of the 15,184 patients identified, 14,652 patients (96.5%) had a FB, 185 patients (1.2%) had a monoblock-DM, and 347 patients (2.3%) had a modular-DM prosthesis. After propensity-score matching, a total of 447 patients were matched comparison. There was no statistical difference in the 90-day readmission (P=0.584), revision rate (P=0.265), and 90-day readmission (P=0.365) and revision rate due to dislocation (P=0.365) between the cohorts. Discharge disposition was also non-significant (P=0.124). There was no statistical difference in FJS-12 scores at 3-months (P=0.820), 1-year (P=0.982), and 2-years (P=0.608) between the groups. Conclusion: DM bearings yield PROMs similar to those of FB implants in patients undergoing primary THA. Although DM implants are utilized more often in patients at higher-risk for instability, we suggest that similar patient satisfaction may be attained while achieving similar dislocation rates.

Risk of Instability After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a major source of morbidity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The risk of recurrent infection has been more extensively studied than the risk of mechanical failure. We sought to define the incidence of instability after revision TKA for PJI and to compare this incidence with that for revision TKA for instability. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated by 4 arthroplasty surgeons at 1 institution. The primary outcome was a new diagnosis of clinical instability after index revision. We analyzed potential risk factors that may contribute to postoperative instability after PJI, including demographic characteristics, implant alignment, number of previous procedures, level of constraint during index revision, and type of spacer used. Patients were matched 1:1 with patients undergoing revision TKA for instability. Continuous variables were compared with Student's t test for normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normal variables. Categorical variables were compared with Fisher's exact test. Thirty-seven patients who underwent revision TKA for PJI were identified. Twelve (32.4%) had clinical instability after revision, compared with only 3 (8.1%) in the matched cohort (P=.019). Use of a revision, midlevel constraint device in the PJI cohort did not correlate with a lower risk of instability (P=.445). A greater number of previous surgical procedures increased the likelihood of instability (P=.041). Revision TKA for PJI is associated with a high risk of subsequent instability. Midlevel constrained implants may not be sufficient to prevent instability. A focus on soft tissue tension and a lower threshold for increasing constraint may be prudent in this cohort. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):145-150.].

Adoption of Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with Decreased Use of Articular Constraint and Manipulation under Anesthesia Compared to a Manual Approach.

Haptic robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) seeks to leverage three-dimensional planning, intraoperative assessment of ligament laxity, and guided bone preparation to establish and achieve patient-specific targets for implant position. We sought to compare (1) operative details, (2) knee alignment, (3) recovery of knee function, and (4) complications during adoption of this technique to our experience with manual TKA. We compared 120 RATKAs performed between December 2016 and July 2018 to 120 consecutive manual TKAs performed between May 2015 and January 2017. Operative details, lengths of stay (LOS), and discharge dispositions were collected. Tibiofemoral angles, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and ranges of motion were assessed until 3 months postoperatively. Manipulations under anesthesia, complications, and reoperations were tabulated. Mean operative times were 22 minutes longer in RATKA (p < 0.001) for this early cohort, but decreased by 27 minutes (p < 0.001) from the first 25 RATKA cases to the last 25 RATKA cases. Less articular constraint was used to achieve stability in RATKA (93 vs. 55% cruciate-retaining, p < 0.001; 3 vs. 35% posterior stabilized (PS), p < 0.001; and 4 vs. 10% varus-valgus constrained, p_ = _0.127). RATKA had lower LOS (2.7 vs. 3.4 days, p < 0.001). Discharge dispositions, tibiofemoral angles, KSS, and knee flexion angles did not differ, but manipulations were less common in RATKAs (4 vs. 17%, p = 0.013). We observed less use of constraint, shorter LOS, and fewer manipulations under anesthesia in RATKA, with no increase in complications. Operative times were longer, particularly early in the learning curve, but improved with experience. All measured patient-centered outcomes were equivalent or favored the newer technique, suggesting that RATKA with patient-specific alignment targets does not compromise initial quality. Observed differences may relate to improved ligament balance or diminished need for ligament release.

Presence of back pain prior total knee arthroplasty and its effects on short-term patient-reported outcome measures.

PURPOSE: Back pain may both decrease patient satisfaction after TKA and confound outcome assessment in satisfied patients. Our primary objective was to determine whether preoperative back pain is associated with differences in postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 234 primary TKA patients who completed PROMs preoperatively and 12 weeks postoperatively, which included a back pain questionnaire, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Cohorts were defined based on the severity of preoperative back pain (none, mild, moderate and severe) and compared. Demographics were compared using ANOVA and Chi-square analysis. Univariate ANCOVA analysis was utilized to compare PROMs while accounting for significant demographic differences. RESULTS: Both preoperative KOOS JR scores (none: 47.90, mild: 47.61, moderate: 44.61 and severe: 38.70; p = 0.013) and 12-week postoperative KOOS JR scores (none: 61.24, mild: 64.94, moderate: 57.48 and severe: 57.01; p = 0.012) had a statistically significant inverse relationship with regard to the intensity of preoperative back pain. Although FJS-12 scores at the 12-week postoperative period trended lower with increasing levels of preoperative back pain (p = 0.362), it did not reach statistical significance. Patients who reported severe back pain preoperatively achieved the largest delta improvement from baseline compared to those with lesser pain intensity (p = 0.003). Patients who had a 2-grade improvement in their back pain achieved significantly higher KOOS JR scores 12 weeks postoperatively compared to patients with either 1-grade or no improvement (63.53 vs. 55.98; p = 0.042). Both preoperative (47.99 vs. 41.11; p = 0.003) and 12-week postoperative (64.06 vs. 55.73; p < 0.001) KOOS JR scores were statistically higher for those who reported mild or no back pain pre-and postoperatively than those who reported moderate or severe back pain pre-and postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Knee pain and back pain both exert negative effects on outcome instruments designed to measure pain and function. Although mean improvement from pre- to postoperative KOOS JR scores for patients with severe pre-existing back pain was higher than their counterparts, this statistical difference is likely not clinically significant. This implies that all patients may experience similar benefits from TKA despite the presence or absence of back pain. Attempts to measure TKA outcomes using PROMs should seek to control for lumbago and other sources of body pain. Level of Evidence IIIRetrospective Cohort Study.