Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this RCT was to compare the extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy with the scarf osteotomy in correcting hallux valgus deformity and improving functional scores and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned and kept blind to surgical allocation. Cases requiring additional procedures including the Akin osteotomy were excluded. Outcomes were measured at 1 year following surgery. RESULTS: 84 patients (109 feet) were analysed (60 modified chevron; 49 Scarf). The mean age was 50.7 years (75F: 9M). Post-operative intermetatarsal angle (IMA) was significantly lower in the modified chevron group (5.8° versus 6.9°, p=0.045). Hallux valgus angle and distal metatarsal articular angle were similar. The magnitude of IMA correction with the modified chevron was also significantly greater (9.1° versus 7.1°, p=0.007). Both osteotomies produced comparable MOxFQ scores and satisfaction ratings. CONCLUSION: The modified chevron was superior to the scarf osteotomy in correcting IMA in hallux valgus deformity.

Ground Reaction Force Calcaneal Offset: A new measurement of hindfoot alignment.

BACKGROUND: The tibio-calcaneal angle (TCA) does not measure individual forefoot contributions to the overall foot balance. Using standard radiographs we calculated the ideal hindfoot alignment based on ground reaction force (GRF), independently from the tibial axis. METHODS: Thirty-six patients (40ft.) were included. Mean age was 56. Weight bearing radiographs were taken. Calcaneal offsets were measured using tibio-calcaneal angles and GRF algorithms. Measurements were compared using the Bland-Altman method. FINDINGS: Both methods agreed (p>0.05) but individual discrepancies were found. Mean measured offsets were -11.5mm (SD: 10.2) using TCA and -8mm (SD: 9.3) using GRF. Mean bias between the methods was -0.88mm. INTERPRETATION: The GRF algorithm successfully measured hindfoot alignment. The absence of a previous gold standard and radiographic variability are a limit. The TCA underestimated calcaneal offset. Discrepancies showed that forefoot position data provided increased accuracy. This could be of particular relevance for surgical planning.

Bone graft harvest from the proximal tibia in foot and ankle arthrodesis surgery.

BACKGROUND: Fresh autogenous cancellous bone graft is the material of choice in reconstruction and fusion procedures in foot and ankle surgery. There are many potential donor sites for graft harvest, all with recognized minor and major complications. The proximal tibia is one such potential site and is particularly suited to foot and ankle surgery, because it is within the operative field and under tourniquet control. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 148 procedures using bone graft from the proximal tibia performed over a period of 5 years. Minimum followup was 3 months. Data were obtained from operative notes and patient interviews to establish pain, morbidity, and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Most patients had no pain (78%) or very mild pain (20%) at the site of graft harvest immediately after surgery. At followup, 96% had no pain and 4% had very mild pain with certain activities such as kneeling. There were no major complications. Four patients (2.7%) had persisting areas of paresthesia at followup, but none were troubled by it. One patient had a superficial wound infection that resolved. The period of nonweightbearing, usually 2 to 3 weeks, was dictated by the primary procedure. There were no complications related to early weightbearing CONCLUSIONS: The proximal tibia is a suitable and safe site for bone graft harvest for foot and ankle surgery. There is no need for additional restrictions in weightbearing after this procedure.