Beware: hospital control or ownership of medical groups.

The rapidly changing, unsettled economic and political health care environment is cause for great anxieties for physicians and hospitals alike. Most physicians have joined IPAs or medical groups in order to obtain continued access to patients who are rapidly shifting from indemnity to cost saving HMOs and PPOs. Many hospitals are seeking to increase their primary care provider base by obtaining control of physicians which may increase their opportunity for institutional success. In many cases, hospitals are providing substantial subsidies or buying physician practices, sometimes in apparent violation of anti-trust law. Physicians ostensibly receive good management advice and infrastructure support from hospital business officers or hospital controlled MSOs. However, when the hospital controls individual physicians or medical groups, there is an inherent conflict of interest because of very different strategic needs. It is not in the physicians' best interests to succumb to the siren songs which hospitals are playing. Providing the highest level of care possible for patients requires that physicians maintain professional independence and autonomy now and in the foreseeable future. Equitable negotiation and collaboration between medical groups and hospitals can only be obtained when there is a lawful and level playing field.

Improving "medical necessity" acceptance by health care providers and consumers.

A major problem for patients and providers has existed since establishment of peer review and authorization agency medical necessity guide lines, because physicians and patients who receive denial of proposed procedures and tests on the basis of so called "medical necessity" presume that the authorization agency considers the proposed procedure or test to be medically unnecessary, meaning of no health value to the patient. This may well not be the case. Both providers and consumers can be expected to be more accepting of negative authorization decisions if the principles of continuous quality improvement are brought to bear on the authorization process.

Primary venous obstruction of the upper extremity.

Three cases of primary axillary and subclavian venous obstruction presented herein demonstrated the classic findings of swelling, aching or pain, and discoloration following effort in an otherwise healthy person. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by venography. Residual changes were frequent after treatment that included anticoagulation and thrombectomy.