Integrated Behavioral Health Prevention for Infants in Pediatric Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric primary care is a promising setting in which to deliver preventive behavioral health services to young children and their families. Integrated behavioral health care models typically emphasize treatment rather than prevention. This pilot study examined the efficacy of an integrated behavioral health preventive (IBH-P) intervention delivered by psychologists and focused on supporting parenting in low-income mothers of infants as part of well-child visits in the first 6 months of life. METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach that included a pilot randomized clinical trial and post-intervention qualitative interviews, 137 mothers were randomly assigned to receive IBH-P or usual care. Self-report measures of parenting, child behavior, and stress were obtained at pre- and/or post-intervention. Direct observation of mother-infant interactions was conducted at post-intervention. RESULTS: No differences between groups were found on maternal attunement, knowledge of child development, nurturing parenting, or infant behavior. A secondary analysis on a subsample with no prior exposure to IBH-P with older siblings found that mothers in IBH-P reported increased self-efficacy relative to controls. In the qualitative interviews, mothers stated that they valued IBH-P, learning about their baby, liked the integration in primary care, and felt respected and comfortable with their provider. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are discussed in terms of the next steps in refining IBH-P approaches to prevention in primary care.

Behavior Problems in Low-Income Young Children Screened in Pediatric Primary Care.

Importance: Screening of behavior problems in young children in pediatric primary care is essential to timely intervention and optimizing trajectories for social-emotional development. Identifying differential behavior problem trajectories provides guidance for tailoring prevention and treatment. Objective: To identify trajectories of behavior problems in children 2 to 6 years of age screened in pediatric primary care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study identified trajectories of behavior problems and demographic and clinical correlates. Data were collected as part of routine care in 3 pediatric primary care offices and 3 school-based health centers in Ohio serving a primarily low-income population. In total, 15 218 children aged 2 to 6 years with well-child visits between July 13, 2016, and January 31, 2022, were included. Exposure: Caregivers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) at annual well-child visits. Main Outcomes and Measures: Trajectory groups were identified using latent growth mixture modeling of SDQ total difficulties scores, and relative risk ratio (RRR) of various demographic (eg, race) and clinical (eg, depression in caregiver) variables were assessed by multinomial logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 15 281 children (51.3% males), 10 410 (68.1%) were African American or Black, 299 (2.0%) were Asian, 13 (0.1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 876 (5.7%) were multiracial, 26 (0.2%) were Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, 2829 (18.5%) were White, and 39 (0.02%) were categorized as other. In addition, 944 (6.2%) identified as Hispanic and 14 246 (93.2%) as non-Hispanic. Four behavior problem trajectory groups reflecting severity were identified: low-stable (LS; 10 096 [66.1%]), moderate-decreasing (MD; 16.6%), low-increasing (LI; 13.1%), and high-increasing (HI; 4.3%). Relative to the LS group, patients in each elevated group were more likely to be male (HI RRR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.55-2.26]; MD RRR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.41-1.71]; and LI RRR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.70-2.21]), White (HI RRR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.83-2.81]; MD RRR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.13-1.45]; and LI RRR, 1.54, [95% CI, 1.32-1.81]), publicly insured (HI RRR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28-0.84]; MD RRR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.43-0.73]; and LI RRR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.35-0.73]), have a social need (HI RRR, 3.07 [95% CI, 2.53-3.73]; MD RRR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.82-2.25]; and LI RRR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.84-2.44]), and have a caregiver with depression (HI RRR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.38-2.00]; MD RRR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.31-1.58]; and LI RRR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.23-1.58]). Relative to the LI group, patients in the MD group were less likely to be male (RRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68-0.93). Conclusions: The substantial portion of young children with increased behavior problems observed in this cohort study underscores the need for screening in pediatric primary care. Caregivers with depression and family social needs warrant prioritization in early prevention and treatment to alter elevated trajectories.

Provider Perspectives on an Integrated Behavioral Health Prevention Approach in Pediatric Primary Care.

The purpose of this study was to use qualitative interviews to ascertain the perspective of pediatric primary care providers on the implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) as provided by psychologists within an expanded HealthySteps™ model, and with a particular focus on prevention of behavioral health symptoms in the first five years. A semi-structured interview guide was used to assess medical providers' perceptions of behavioral health integration into their primary care clinics. A conventional qualitative content analysis approach was utilized to identify patterns of meaning across qualitative interviews. Four themes were identified: (1) practice prior to IBH and initial concerns about integration, (2) psychologist's role and perceived added value, (3) what integration looks like in practice, and (4) perceived families' response to and experiences with IBH. Despite initial concerns about potential disruptions to clinic flow, providers indicated that adoption of IBH was seamless. The distinct roles of the psychologist were clear, and both treatment and prevention services provided by IBH were valued. Multidisciplinary collaboration and real-time response to family needs was seen as especially important and primary care providers reported that families were accepting of and highly valued IBH.

Adapting a preschool disruptive behavior group for the underserved in pediatric primary care practice.

INTRODUCTION: While behavioral parent training (BPT) is the first line treatment for preschool aged children with disruptive behavior, only a fraction of families receive these therapies. The integration of BPT within the pediatric primary care (PPC) setting is a promising way to address this need, as the PPC setting is the first and only point of contact for most children diagnosed with mental health disorders. We piloted a clinical innovation by implementing an adapted BPT group in an urban, academic, PPC practice, serving a low-income, predominantly Black population. METHOD: Using a formative program development approach and a cultural adaptation framework, structural and cultural adaptations to the program were implemented to increase engagement and adaptability of the group to meet the needs of our PPC population. RESULTS: Learnings indicated that these adaptations were feasible and acceptable to families. Specifically, they were effective in engaging families and transforming the practice of primary care providers. DISCUSSION: Our work offers a case example to guide efforts to thoughtfully and effectively adapt evidence-based interventions for disruptive behavior in primary care settings. These processes provide one strategy to ameliorate behavioral health disparities in diverse, racial/ethnic minority populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Obesity Prevention Program for High-Risk Infants in Primary Care.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid infant weight gain is associated with later obesity. Novel interventions to prevent rapid infant weight gain that are accessible to infants and families are needed, especially for those at the highest risk. Our aims were to examine: (a) feasibility and acceptability of a responsive parenting intervention delivered via Integrated Behavioral Health (IBH) in pediatric primary care and (b) preliminary effects on infant weight gain from birth to 6 (post-treatment) and 9 (follow-up) months. METHODS: A parallel design, proof-of-concept randomized control trial was conducted with 65 mother-infant dyads (32 randomized to intervention, 33 randomized an IBH attention control focused on promoting healthy mental health), in which the majority identify as Black (80%) and low income (91% receiving Medicaid). Participants and assessors were masked to treatment condition. Outcomes included feasibility (enrollment), acceptability (retention and adherence), and conditional weight gain (CWG), an indicator of rapid weight gain. RESULTS: The intervention was feasible (90% of eligible families enrolled) and acceptable (89% of families retained), with 81% receiving ≥3 of 4 treatment sessions. A medium effect was found on CWG (d = -0.54 post-treatment, d = -0.57 follow-up), with the infants in the treatment group showing significantly lower CWG (mean = -0.27, 95% CI, -0.63, 0.09) compared to the control group (mean = 0.29, 95% CI, -0.17, 0.76) at 9 months (p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a responsive parenting obesity prevention intervention within primary care. Delivery in pediatric primary care is advantageous for implementation and reaching at-risk populations. The preliminary effects on CWG are promising and support testing in a larger trial.