Evaluation of a novel molecular vibration-based descriptor (EVA) for QSAR studies: 2. Model validation using a benchmark steroid dataset.

The EVA molecular descriptor derived from calculated molecular vibrational frequencies is validated for use in QSAR studies. EVA provides a conformationally sensitive but, unlike 3D-QSAR methods such as CoMFA, superposition-free descriptor that has been shown to perform well with a wide range of datasets and biological endpoints. A detailed study is made using a benchmark steroid dataset with a training/test set division of structures. Intensive statistical validation tests are undertaken including various forms of crossvalidation and repeated random permutation testing. Latent variable score plots show that the distribution of structures in reduced dimensional space can be rationalized in terms of activity classes and that EVA is sensitive to structural inconsistencies. Together, the findings indicate that EVA is a statistically robust means of detecting structure-activity correlations with performance entirely comparable to that of analogous CoMFAs. The EVA descriptor is shown to be conformationally sensitive and as such can be considered to be a 3D descriptor but with the advantage over CoMFA that structural superposition is not required. EVA has the property that in certain situations the conformational sensitivity can be altered through the appropriate choice of the EVA sigma parameter.

Evaluation of quantitative structure-activity relationship methods for large-scale prediction of chemicals binding to the estrogen receptor.

Three different QSAR methods, Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA), classical QSAR (utilizing the CODESSA program), and Hologram QSAR (HQSAR), are compared in terms of their potential for screening large data sets of chemicals as endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). While CoMFA and CODESSA (Comprehensive Descriptors for Structural and Statistical Analysis) have been commercially available for some time, HQSAR is a novel QSAR technique. HQSAR attempts to correlate molecular structure with biological activity for a series of compounds using molecular holograms constructed from counts of sub-structural molecular fragments. In addition to using r2 and q2 (cross-validated r2) in assessing the statistical quality of QSAR models, another statistical parameter was defined to be the ratio of the standard error to the activity range. The statistical quality of the QSAR models constructed using CoMFA and HQSAR techniques were comparable and were generally better than those produced with CODESSA. It is notable that only 2D-connectivity, bond and elemental atom-type information were considered in building HQSAR models. Since HQSAR requires no conformational analysis or structural alignment, it is straightforward to use and lends itself readily to the rapid screening of large numbers of compounds. Among the QSAR methods considered, HQSAR appears to offer many attractive features, such as speed, reproducibility and ease of use, which portend its utility for prioritizing large numbers of potential EDCs for subsequent toxicological testing and risk assessment.