The prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and cobalamin deficiency in patients with chronic urticaria.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of studies reporting the presence of systemic symptoms and micronutrient deficiency in patients with chronic urticaria, and these data are lacking in a Canadian population. OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency in a Canadian patient population diagnosed with chronic urticaria. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 100 adult patients with chronic urticaria was conducted. Demographic characteristics, medications, presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, and laboratory findings were abstracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Seventy percent of patients with chronic urticaria reported experiencing gastrointestinal symptoms. The most common symptom identified was gastroesophageal reflux (42%). Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency, defined as serum vitamin B12 level ≤ 250 pmol/L, was identified in 31.7% of the patients. Among those patients with urticaria and vitamin B12, 68% reported gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to provide data on the high prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency in a Canadian population diagnosed with chronic urticaria. Early recognition and management of systemic symptoms and micronutrient deficiency may lead to a more comprehensive approach to management of these patients. Trial registration Not applicable.

Insight into Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pathogenesis: Is the Answer Blowing in the Wind?

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are conditions characterized by immune dysregulation to a trigger in those with a genetic predisposition. Environmental factors are thought to contribute to IBD, but no definite trigger has been identified. Aeroallergens have not been thoroughly investigated in their potential contribution to the pathogenesis to IBD. The geographic distribution of aeroallergens and IBD, the association of atopic disease with IBD, seasonality and IBD, and cross-reactive food allergens require further study with implications for targeted dietary and immunomodulatory therapies.

The role of antimalarials in the exacerbation of psoriasis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To critically review the body of literature that refutes or supports the role of antimalarials in the exacerbation of psoriasis. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were reviewed to identify English-language publications from 1966-2005 examining the role of antimalarials in the exacerbation of psoriasis. A total of 374 articles were identified, of which 32 studies met the inclusion criteria. All available clinical trials or reported cases of the use of antimalarials for patients with psoriasis were included. Data from clinical studies were summarized according to the level of evidence and the outcome of the study. Data were entered into a standardized data extraction form by two independent reviewers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: No randomized trial evidence was found. Only one cohort study was available for review. A total of 31 case series and case reports were obtained. There is no strong evidence to refute or support the role of antimalarials in the exacerbation of psoriasis. Controlled trials of antimalarial therapy and its effect on psoriasis are warranted.

Antihistamines in the treatment of dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disorder that is exceedingly challenging to treat. A prominent feature of AD is chronic pruritus. Early evidence suggested that pruritus in AD was partially due to mast cell release of histamines. Conversely, recent studies do not validate the role of histamine in the pathogenesis of pruritus. Conventional management continues to include the wide use of antihistamines to treat the persistent itch, however, there is an urgent need for therapy which will reduce the severity of pruritus for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To review the evidence in the literature for the use of antihistamines in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. METHODS: A MEDLINE search (1966-2002) was performed to obtain studies examining the use of antihistamines in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Search terms included: atopic dermatitis; eczema; antihistamines; azatadine; brompheniramine; cetirizine; chlorpheniramine; clemastine; cyclizine; cyproheptadine; desloratadine; diphenhydramine; fexofenadine; hydroxyzine; loratadine; meclizine; promethazine; trimeprazine. Further references were gathered from these publications. RESULTS: Historically, antihistamines have been used in the treatment of AD. However, this review shows that the evidence for its use is inconclusive. At present, several antihistamines continue to provide relief of pruritus by central sedation, and they can also be used therapeutically for concomitant allergic conditions associated with AD. More clinical trials examining the therapeutic efficacy of antihistamines, especially with the newer nonsedating antihistamines, are necessary to elucidate their role in the treatment of AD. CONCLUSION: Dermatologists require additional evidence regarding the efficacy of antihistamines and their mechanism of action in the treatment of AD to enhance patient care.