Fluorescence in situ hybridization for detecting Coxiella burnetii in tissue samples from chronic Q fever patients.

OBJECTIVE: Detection of the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii, causative agent of chronic Q fever, is notoriously difficult. Diagnosis of and duration of antibiotic treatment for chronic Q fever is partly determined by detection of the bacterium with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) might be a promising technique for detecting C. burnetii in tissue samples from chronic Q fever patients, but its value in comparison with PCR is uncertain. We aim to assess the value of FISH for detecting C. burnetii in tissue of chronic Q fever patients. METHODS: FISH and PCR were performed on tissue samples from Dutch chronic Q fever patients collected during surgery or autopsy. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Additionally, data on patient and disease characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. RESULTS: In total, 49 tissue samples from mainly vascular walls, heart valves, or placentas, obtained from 39 chronic Q fever patients, were examined by FISH and PCR. The sensitivity and specificity of FISH compared to PCR for detecting C. burnetii in tissue samples from chronic Q fever patients was 45.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 27.3% - 64.0%) and 84.6% (95% CI, 54.6% - 98.1%), respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 56.8% (95% CI, 42.2% - 72.3%). Two C. burnetii PCR negative placentas were FISH positive. Four FISH results (8.2%) were deemed inconclusive because of autofluorescence. CONCLUSION: With an overall diagnostic accuracy of 57.8%, we conclude that FISH has limited value in the routine diagnostics of chronic Q fever.

Comparative analysis of four methods to extract DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues: effect on downstream molecular applications.

BACKGROUND: A large portion of tissues stored worldwide for diagnostic purposes is formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE). These FFPE-archived tissues are an extremely valuable source for retrospective (genetic) studies. These include mutation screening in cancer-critical genes as well as pathogen detection. In this study we evaluated the impact of several widely used DNA extraction methods on the quality of molecular diagnostics on FFPE tissues. FINDINGS: We compared 4 DNA extraction methods from 4 identically processed FFPE mammary-, prostate-, colon- and lung tissues with regard to PCR inhibition, real time SNP detection and amplifiable fragment size. The extraction methods, with and without proteinase K pre-treatment, tested were: 1) heat-treatment, 2) QIAamp DNA-blood-mini-kit, 3) EasyMAG NucliSens and 4) Gentra Capture-Column-kit.Amplifiable DNA fragment size was assessed by multiplexed 200-400-600 bp PCR and appeared highly influenced by the extraction method used. Proteinase K pre-treatment was a prerequisite for proper purification of DNA from FFPE. Extractions with QIAamp, EasyMAG and heat-treatment were found suitable for amplification of fragments up to 400 bp from all tissues, 600 bp amplification was marginally successful (best was QIAamp). QIAamp and EasyMAG extracts were found suitable for downstream real time SNP detection. Gentra extraction was unsuitable. Hands-on time was lowest for heat-treatment, followed by EasyMAG. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the extraction method plays an important role with regard to performance in downstream molecular applications.