The orphan receptor GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor.

BACKGROUND: The endocannabinoid system functions through two well characterized receptor systems, the CB1 and CB2 receptors. Work by a number of groups in recent years has provided evidence that the system is more complicated and additional receptor types should exist to explain ligand activity in a number of physiological processes. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Cells transfected with the human cDNA for GPR55 were tested for their ability to bind and to mediate GTPgammaS binding by cannabinoid ligands. Using an antibody and peptide blocking approach, the nature of the G-protein coupling was determined and further demonstrated by measuring activity of downstream signalling pathways. KEY RESULTS: We demonstrate that GPR55 binds to and is activated by the cannabinoid ligand CP55940. In addition endocannabinoids including anandamide and virodhamine activate GTPgammaS binding via GPR55 with nM potencies. Ligands such as cannabidiol and abnormal cannabidiol which exhibit no CB1 or CB2 activity and are believed to function at a novel cannabinoid receptor, also showed activity at GPR55. GPR55 couples to Galpha13 and can mediate activation of rhoA, cdc42 and rac1. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that GPR55 is a novel cannabinoid receptor, and its ligand profile with respect to CB1 and CB2 described here will permit delineation of its physiological function(s).

Adenosine is not a direct GHSR agonist--artificial cross-talk between GHSR and adenosine receptor pathways.

AIM: To assess if adenosine is a direct growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) agonist by investigating the mechanism behind adenosine induced calcium release in human embryonic kidney 293s (HEK) cells expressing GHSR. METHODS: Calcium mobilization, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and IP(3) experiments were performed using HEK cells stably expressing GHSR and/or adenosine A(2B) receptor (A(2B)R). RESULTS: Adenosine has been widely reported as a GHSR agonist. In our hands, adenosine and forskolin stimulated calcium release from IP(3) controlled stores in HEK-GHSR cells but not in non-transfected HEK cells. This release was not accompanied by increased IP(3) levels. The calcium release was both cholera toxin and U73122 sensitive, indicating the involvement of both Galpha(s)/adenylyl cyclase and Galpha(q/11)/phospholipase C pathways. Importantly, the GHSR inverse agonist [D-Arg(1) D-Phe(5) D-Trp(7,9) Leu(11)]-Substance P (SP-analogue) blocked the adenosine stimulated calcium release, demonstrating that GHSR is involved. Assessment of the GHSR-dependent calcium release using adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists resulted in a rank order of potencies resembling the profile of A(2B)R. A(2B)R over-expression in HEK-GHSR cells enhanced potency and efficacy of the adenosine induced calcium release without increasing IP(3) production. Moreover, A(2B)R over-expression in HEK cells potentiated NECA-induced cAMP production. However, GHSR expression had no effect on intracellular cAMP production. CONCLUSION: In HEK-GHSR cells adenosine activates endogenously expressed A(2B)R resulting in calcium mobilization. We hypothesize that the responsible mechanism is cAMP-dependent sensitization of IP(3) receptors for the high basal level of IP(3) caused by GHSR constitutive activity. Altogether, our results demonstrate that adenosine is not a direct GHSR agonist.