Aortic Rupture by an Acute Dissection of the Thoracoabdominal Aorta in a 12-Year-Old Boy.

Aortic dissection is exceptional in children. When they are affected, many clinical conditions as Marfan syndrome or Ehlers-Danlos syndrome are usually involved, but up to 22% have no associated background. Its high morbidity and low incidence in this age group require a high level of suspicion in children without predisposing factors when the presentation is atypical, to avoid the severe consequences of the delay of their diagnosis. In this article we describe the dissection and aortic rupture in a 12-year-old child without relevant medical history, and the open repair that was performed as treatment.

Prognostic Value of Initial Aneurysmal Sac Regression after EVAR.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of initial aneurysmal sac reduction after endovascular aneurysm repair on the evolution of aneurysmal sac over follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was made of patients subjected to elective treatment between January 2005 and December 2014, with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. An analysis was made of the evolution of the aneurysmal sac according to its condition one year after surgery, defining of two groups: A (sac reduction) and B (stable sac). Follow-up by computed tomography (CT) angiography was made after one month and then every 6 months or annually, depending on the presence of endoleak. RESULTS: A total of 128 patients were included. Fifty-one patients (39.8%) showed a significant decrease in diameter during the first year (group A), whereas 77 patients (60.2%) showed no initial decrease (group B). Preoperative CT angiography showed the patients in group A to have larger aneurysms (63.5 mm vs. 59.25; P = 0.048), a greater presence of posterior thrombus (68.6% vs. 30.7%; P < 0.001), and fewer patent lumbar vessels (56.9% vs. 83.1%; P = 0.001). The prevalence of endoleak at some point during follow-up was lower in group A (31.4% vs. 74% in group B; P < 0.001), and 100% of all aneurysmal growths were associated to the presence of endoleak. After 5 years, significant differences were observed in the growth-free rate (96.9% in group A vs. 85.2% in group B; hazard ratio [HR] 4.8 [1.1-21.4; P = 0.036]) and in the reintervention-free rate (95,7% vs. 84.6%; HR 6.6 [0.8-52.4; P = 0.07]). No reoperation in group A was due to type II endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: The aneurysmal sac can be expected to take a favorable course in those cases characterized by initial aneurysmal sac reduction. These findings may imply a change in the follow-up protocol, even in cases with type II endoleak.

Thoracic Stent Grafting through Transapical Approach for Type III Endoleak due to Prosthetic Disconnection.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is a well-established treatment of descending thoracic aneurysms, and increasingly complex endovascular procedures including aortic arch and ascending aorta are being performed. However, follow-up complications may be expected, which will enhance the need for alternative approaches such as transapical, in case of complex anatomies and reinterventions. We report the case of a man with prior history of ischemic cardiopathy and multiple endovascular aortic interventions with proximal landing in zone 1 and distal landing proximal to celiac trunk. During the follow-up, the patient developed a 9-cm proximal thoracic aneurysm due to type III endoleak secondary to proximal prosthetic disconnection. Because of severe aortic elongation, inadequate usual vessel accesses (transfemoral/subclavian), and proximity to aortic arch, transapical approach was thought to be the best option in this case. The stent graft was correctly deployed without complications, and the postoperative imaging revealed an excellent result.

Impact of the Repositionable C3 Excluder System on the Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms With Unfavorable Neck Anatomy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the midterm clinical outcomes among patients with favorable and unfavorable neck morphology for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), specifically the impact of the repositionable C3 Excluder stent-graft on type I endoleak in patients with unfavorable neck. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 249 patients (mean age 74.3 years; 241 men) who underwent successful EVAR from January 2000 to December 2014 using either the traditional Excluder (n=140) or the C3 repositionable system (n=109). Unfavorable proximal aortic neck anatomy was defined by length <15 mm, angulation >60°, >50% circumferential thrombus, or >50% neck calcification. By these criteria, unfavorable neck anatomy was present in 71 (28.5%) patients (41 traditional Excluder and 30 C3 Excluder). The main endpoint was the incidence of type Ia endoleak and the need for a proximal cuff according to the type of neck anatomy. Comparisons between groups are reported as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A proximal extension cuff for type Ia endoleak was needed in 4 (2.2%) patients with favorable neck anatomy compared to 7 (9.9%) patients with unfavorable neck (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.3 to 16.8, p=0.014). Among the patients with unfavorable neck, a proximal cuff was implanted in 6/41 (14.6%) traditional Excluder stent-grafts vs 1/30 (3.3%) in the C3 Excluder group (OR 4.39, 95% CI 0.55 to 34.58, p=0.23). Median follow-up was 30.5 and 38 months for favorable vs unfavorable neck groups, respectively (p=0.29). Only 1 case of type Ia endoleak was registered at 6.5 years' follow-up (traditional Excluder), with no device migration. CONCLUSION: Both Excluder stent-grafts provide good midterm clinical outcomes after EVAR in patients with unfavorable neck anatomy. Investigation of a larger cohort will be needed to identify if the C3 Excluder device offers any improvement over the traditional Excluder in terms of freedom from endoleaks.

Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment Failure in Patients with Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the clinical impact derived from endovascular treatment failure on patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease (FPOD) regarding their preoperative clinical stage. METHODS: Retrospective review for primary endovascular procedures for FPOD from 2008 to 2013. Primary end point included clinical deterioration defined as acute limb ischemia (ALI) or clinical worsening by, at least, one Rutherford's classification category, related to procedure's failure (restenosis >70% or occlusion). RESULTS: Ninety procedures were analyzed in 85 patients, 87.8% operated due to critical limb ischemia. The lesion treated was classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)-A/B in 76.7%, with a mean length of 98.5 ± 54 mm. Covered stent graft (SG) was used in 31.1% of the cases. Median follow-up was 14.5 months and treatment failure occurred in 33.3% of cases (n = 30, 9 restenosis and 21 occlusions). Clinical worsening was assessed in 40% of treatment failures and 6 of 21 (28.6%) presented as ALI. Twenty-two major adverse limb events (MALEs) were recorded and 8 major amputations. Regarding the type of stent, more occlusions were recorded on patients treated with SG compared with bare metal stent (39.3% vs. 16%; P = 0.02). However, no differences were found between groups regarding clinical worsening attributable to treatment failure (HR, 1.33; CI 95%, 0.5-3.5; P = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, TASC-C/D lesions (HR, 5.5; CI 95%, 2.3-13.3; P < 0.001) and female sex (HR, 4.9; CI 95%, 1.9-12.5; P = 0.001) behaved as significant predictors for failure and dual-antiplatelet therapy as a protective factor (HR, 0.3; CI 95%, 0.3-0.13; P = 0.03). No predictors were obtained regarding clinical worsening and occurrence of MALEs in our series. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with failure of endovascular procedures on FPOD appeared with clinical worsening in a no negligible number of cases in our sample regarding their preoperative clinical situation. Thus, we believe that endovascular treatment should be carefully deliberated.

Systematic nasogastric tube in aortic surgery: is it necessary?

BACKGROUND: Routine nasogastric tube (NGT) decompression has been traditionally used to prevent nausea and vomiting after abdominal surgery. Besides, many studies having demonstrated no benefits derived from this practice after an elective laparotomy, little evidence has been published regarding its use in aortic surgery. In this study, we analyze the effects of the selective use of the NGT in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery in our center. METHODS: Prospective cohort study including patients who underwent elective infrarenal aortic surgery between January 2011 and December 2012. Patients were prospectively included in group A (systematic NGT placement) and group B (nonsystematic NGT). The main end point was the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Secondary end points were postoperative complications, time to first oral intake, and hospital stay. RESULTS: One hundred patients were finally included in the study, 50 patients per group. Preoperative and intraoperative data were similar between both groups. Higher incidence of PONV (48% vs. 10%; relative risk, 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.5; P = 0.003) was observed in group A. Selective NGT behaved as a protective factor regarding earlier first oral intake in first postoperative 48 hours (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99; P = 0.05). There were no differences in other adverse events although a trend toward fewer respiratory complications was observed in patients with nonsystematic NGT. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates higher incidence of PONV and longer time to first oral intake in patients with systematic NGT with no benefits derived from this practice. Based on these results, selective NGT decompression should be encouraged in patients undergoing infrarenal aortic surgery.

Cystic adventitial degeneration of the popliteal artery: report on 3 cases and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Cystic adventitial disease (CAD) is a rare, nonatherosclerotic vascular condition predominantly seen in middle-aged men with no cardiovascular risk factors. Three cases have been diagnosed and treated in our institution during the past 8 years. The purpose of this report is to provide an updated literature review of this condition with the addition of 3 new cases. METHODS: Information about 3 new cases is presented along with data obtained from articles published between 1979 and 2012 from PubMed and Embase databases. Two hundred thirty-eight articles were found, and 98 were included in our review. RESULTS: All patients treated presented with rapidly progressive intermittent calf claudication. Diagnosis of CAD was confirmed by at least 2 imaging techniques, either duplex ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, with a preoperative angiography performed in all cases. Wall cyst resection was performed in the 3 cases reported here, after intraoperative confirmation that there was no arterial wall damage. All patients remained asymptomatic with no signs of recurrence after a median 36-month follow-up (24-60 month follow-up). CONCLUSIONS: CAD is a rare vascular condition usually affecting arteries that presents as a sudden onset of unilateral intermittent calf claudication. Diagnosis must be confirmed with imaging techniques, such as duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. On the basis of existing knowledge, surgery remains the treatment of choice, with cystic evacuation in cases with no arterial wall damage or resection and grafting. However, the follow-up algorithm for treated patients remains unclear.