Cnidae sizes in the two morphotypes of the giant Caribbean anemone Condylactis gigantea (Actiniaria: Actiniidae) / Tamaños de cnidae en dos morfotipos de la anémona gigante del Caribe Condylactis gigantea (Actiniaria: Actiniidae)

Abstract The sea anemone Condylactis gigantea is an ecologically important member of the benthic community in coral reefs of the tropical Atlantic, and displays two morphotypes with respect to the color in their tentacular tips: the green tip morphotype and the pink/purple tip morphotype. Although some molecular and ecological differences have been found between these morphotypes, no other morphological distinctions have been reported, and currently both are still considered a single taxonomic species. In the present study, we perform an exploration on the variability in the size of cnidae between these two morphotypes and performed statistical analyses to compare the 10 categories of cnidae from specimens hosted in the Cnidarian Collection of Gulf of Mexico and Mexican Caribbean, of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, which were previously collected in several coral reefs localities of the Yucatán Peninsula. Results reveal no significant variation in cnidae size between the two morphotypes, but significant variations were found within each morphotype. In addition, we update the composition of the cnidom of C. gigantea, and the utility of the size of cnidae to distinguish between morphotypes or closely related species is discussed. Rev. Biol. Trop. 66(3): 1055-1064. Epub 2018 September 01.

Resumen La anémona Condylactis gigantea es un miembro ecológicamente importante de la comunidad bentónica en arrecifes de coral del Atlántico tropical, y exhibe dos morfotipos con respecto al color de las puntas de sus tentáculos: el morfotipo de puntas verdes y el morfotipo de puntas rosadas/púrpuras. Aunque se han encontrado algunas diferencias moleculares y ecológicas entre estos morfotipos, no se han reportado otras distinciones morfológicas, y actualmente ambos siguen siendo considerados una sola especie taxonómica. En el presente estudio, realizamos una exploración sobre la variabilidad en el tamaño de los cnidocistos entre estos dos morfotipos y realizamos un análisis estadístico de 10 categorías de cnidocistos a partir de especímenes albergados en la Colección de cnidarios del Golfo de México y Caribe Mexicano, de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, los cuales fueron previamente recolectados en varias localidades arrecifales de la Península de Yucatán. Los resultados no revelan variación significativa en el tamaño de los cnidocistos entre los dos morfotipos, aunque fueron encontradas variaciones significativas dentro de cada morfotipo. Adicionalmente, actualizamos la composición del cnidoma de C. gigantea, y discutimos sobre la utilidad de la talla de los cnidocistos para distinguir entre morfotipos o entre especies estrechamente relacionadas.

[Pilot benchmarking study of thoracic surgery in Spain: comparison of cases of lung resection and indicators of quality]. / Experiencia piloto de benchmarking en cirugía torácica: comparación de la casuística e indicadores de calidad en resección pulmonar.

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the methods and conclusions of the first Spanish benchmarking study of thoracic surgery. The proposed aims were to describe cases of lung resection in 9 Spanish hospitals, compare indicators of quality among the 9 participating centers, and identify and propose common areas where lung-resection processes could be improved. METHODS: Information was taken from the minimum basic data set for lobectomy and pneumonectomy processes performed in 2002 and 2003. The chosen outcome indicators were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge, adjusted according to surgical complexity. Once the results had been analyzed, the participating centers with best outcomes were identified and a variety of proposed improvements were discussed. RESULTS: A total of 1666 procedures (1276 lobectomies and 390 pneumectomies) were studied. We found differences in mean length of stay, mortality, readmission rate, and morbidity that identified centers with lower mortality or shorter hospital stay for comparable or more complex surgical procedures. However, higher morbidity and readmission rates were found in these centers. CONCLUSIONS: Measures were proposed to ensure that relevant diagnostic information is recorded on discharge. It was also proposed to reduce unnecessarily long hospital stays and to standardize the procedures. With such an approach, reliable criteria that improve the quality of lung-resection processes can be established in the future.

Experiencia piloto de benchmarking en cirugía torácica: comparación de la casuística e indicadores de calidad en resección pulmonar / Pilot benchmarking study of thoracic surgery in Spain: comparison of cases of lung resection and indicators of quality

Objetivo: En el presente artículo se describen los métodos y las conclusiones del primer estudio español de benchmarking en cirugía torácica. Los objetivos propuestos fueron: describir la casuística de resección pulmonar desarrollada en 9 hospitales españoles, comparar indicadores de calidad entre los 9 centros participantes e identificar y proponer áreas de mejora comunes para los procesos de resección pulmonar. Métodos: Se utilizó como fuente de información el conjunto mínimo básico de datos de los años 2002 y 2003 de los procesos de lobectomía o neumonectomía. Los indicadores de resultados seleccionados fueron: mortalidad hospitalaria, morbilidad, estancia y readmisiones urgentes en los 30 días siguientes al alta, ajustadas por complejidad de los casos. Una vez presentados los resultados entre los participantes, se identificaron las unidades con mejores resultados y se discutieron diversas propuestas de mejora. Resultados: Se ha estudiado un total de 1.666 procedimientos (1.276 lobectomías y 390 neumonectomías). Se detectaron diferencias en estancia media, mortalidad, tasa de readmisiones y morbilidad, que permitieron identificar unidades, de complejidad equiparable o superior, con baja mortalidad y estancia. Sin embargo, en estas unidades se apreciaron tasas de morbilidad y readmisión más elevadas. Conclusiones: Se propusieron medidas encaminadas a registrar todos los diagnósticos relevantes en los informes de alta, disminuir las estancias inadecuadas y estandarizar los procedimientos que permitirán en el futuro establecer criterios fiables para mejorar la calidad de los procesos de resección pulmonar

Objective: This article describes the methods and conclusions of the first Spanish benchmarking study of thoracic surgery. The proposed aims were to describe cases of lung resection in 9 Spanish hospitals, compare indicators of quality among the 9 participating centers, and identify and propose common areas where lung-resection processes could be improved. Methods: Information was taken from the minimum basic data set for lobectomy and pneumonectomy processes performed in 2002 and 2003. The chosen outcome indicators were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge, adjusted according to surgical complexity. Once the results had been analyzed, the participating centers with best outcomes were identified and a variety of proposed improvements were discussed. Results: A total of 1666 procedures (1276 lobectomies and 390 pneumectomies) were studied. We found differences in mean length of stay, mortality, readmission rate, and morbidity that identified centers with lower mortality or shorter hospital stay for comparable or more complex surgical procedures. However, higher morbidity and readmission rates were found in these centers. Conclusions: Measures were proposed to ensure that relevant diagnostic information is recorded on discharge. It was also proposed to reduce unnecessarily long hospital stays and to standardize the procedures. With such an approach, reliable criteria that improve the quality of lung-resection processes can be established in the future