[GMK rotating hinge prosthesis. A valid option for complex revision knee prosthetic surgery]. / Prótesis bisagra rotatoria GMK. Una opción válida para la cirugía de revisión protésica compleja de rodilla.

INTRODUCTION: revision joint replacement surgery presents a surgical challenge. The use of rotating hinge prostheses is an option in patients with femorotibial bone defects, ligament insufficiency, or significant deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of a series of patients who underwent surgery using the GMK Hinge (Medacta®) rotational hinge model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a descriptive, retrospective, and analytical study was conducted on a series of 36 patients, with a mean age of 72.5 years (47-85), operated on by the same surgical team between January 2015 and January 2022. The etiology of revision was chronic infection in 38.9% of cases, instability in 33.3%, aseptic loosening in 19.4%, and stiffness in 8.4%. The Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were used to assess functional outcomes. The degree of femorotibial bone defect was evaluated using the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) classification. Postoperative complications are also recorded. RESULTS: a total of 36 patients, 17 males and 19 females, were included, with a mean follow-up of 30 months (12-66). Twelve patients had type 1 defects, ten had 2A defects, ten had 2B defects, and two had type 3 defects on the femoral side, with the use of wedges required for asymmetrical defects (21 patients). The predominant tibial defect was type 1 without the need for wedges. The majority achieved a satisfactory outcome on the KSS scale (72.2 ± 9.4), with significant differences compared to the previous KSS (54.3 ± 8.9). A score of 31 (12-67) was also obtained on the FJS scale. Postoperative complications were present in 16.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: complex prosthetic revision surgery using a rotating hinge prosthesis represents a suitable therapeutic option, yielding appropriate clinical and functional outcomes, albeit not without complications.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la cirugía de revisión protésica constituye un reto quirúrgico. La utilización de prótesis tipo bisagra rotatoria es una opción en pacientes con defectos óseos femorotibiales, insuficiencia ligamentosa o importantes deformidades. El objetivo del presente estudio es evaluar los resultados clínicos, funcionales y radiológicos de una serie de pacientes intervenidos mediante un modelo de bisagra rotacional GMK Hinge (Medacta®). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio descriptivo retrospectivo y analítico que incluyó una serie de 36 pacientes, con edad media de 72.5 años (47-85) intervenidos entre Enero de 2015 y Enero de 2022 por el mismo equipo quirúrgico. La etiología de revisión fue infección crónica en 38.9%, inestabilidad en 33.3%, aflojamiento aséptico en 19.4% y rigidez en 8.4%. Para la evaluación de resultados funcionales se utiliza la escala Knee Society Score (KSS), así como la escala Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). El grado de defecto óseo femorotibial se evaluó mediante la clasificación de Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI). También se registraron las complicaciones postquirúrgicas. RESULTADOS: se analizó un total de 36 pacientes, 17 varones y 19 mujeres, con seguimiento medio de 30 meses (12-66). Se encontraron doce pacientes con defectos tipo 1, diez con defectos 2A, diez con defectos 2B y dos con defecto tipo 3 en la vertiente femoral, siendo necesario la utilización de cuñas en defectos asimétricos (21 pacientes). El defecto tibial mayoritario fue el tipo 1 sin necesidad de cuñas. La mayoría obtuvo un resultado satisfactorio en la escala KSS (72.2 ± 9.4), con diferencias significativas respecto al KSS previo (54.3 ± 8.9). Se obtuvo también una puntuación de 31 (12-67) en la escala FJS. Presentaron complicaciones postoperatorias 16.7% de los pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: la cirugía de revisión protésica compleja mediante prótesis tipo bisagra rotacional constituye una correcta opción terapéutica, presentando resultados clínicos y funcionales adecuados, no exentos de complicaciones.

AVIP Project (Prosthetic Virtual Friend): Study of clinical-functional outcomes and satisfaction with a mobile application in the perioperative management and follow-up of hip arthroplasty. / Proyecto AVIP (Amigo VIrtual Protésico): estudio de resultados clínico-funcionales y de satisfacción con una aplicación móvil en el manejo perioperatorio y seguimiento de implantes protésicos de cadera.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical, quality of life, and healthcare quality outcomes obtained in a series of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), who were empowered and monitored using the AVIP application. These results will be compared with a control group followed through a standard protocol. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Randomized clinical trial with parallel groups involving patients with an indication for THA. Clinical variables were measured and compared using the WOMAC and mHHS, pain assessed by the VAS, quality of life with the SF-12 test. Walking capabilities were analyzed using the Functional Gait Assessment Scale, along with satisfaction levels assessed through the SUCE questionnaire, and perceived anxiety levels related to the process. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were evaluated, with 31 patients in the AVIP group and 33 in the Control group completing the follow-up. Both groups demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes based on the WOMAC and mHHS hip tests, a reduction in perceived pain, and an enhancement in quality of life according to the SF-12 test. Patients in the AVIP study group exhibited non-inferiority in clinical outcomes and satisfaction compared to the control group, as well as lower anxiety levels and improved walking capabilities after the first month of follow-up. Notably, 82.25% of the follow-up visits for this group were conducted remotely. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a mHealth application like AVIP can be safely offered to selected patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, enabling effective monitoring and providing continuous information and training.

Implantes de titanio trabecular en cirugía de revisión acetabular compleja / Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery

Introducción: La cirugía de revisión acetabular supone un reto quirúrgico sobre todo cuando aparecen los defectos óseos complejos, pues dificultan la fijación primaria y osteointegración de los implantes, lo que condiciona la aparición de complicaciones. Los cotilos de titanio trabecular intentan solventar estos problemas. Objetivos: Valorar los resultados clínico-radiológicos, la supervivencia de los implantes y aparición de complicaciones a medio plazo en cirugía de revisión acetabular en una serie de 37 recambios acetabulares con defectos óseos tipo IIIA y IIIB de Paprosky en los que se utilizó un implante de revisión tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular. Material y método: Realizamos un estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de 37 casos con defectos acetabulares complejos (20 tipo IIIA y 17 tipo IIIB, cinco de ellos con discontinuidad pélvica) en los que se realizó recambio del componente acetabular por implantes de titanio trabecular entre los años 2011 y 2019. Analizamos resultados clínicos (dolor y funcionalidad) y parámetros radiológicos (restauración del centro de rotación de la cadera y la movilización de los implantes), así como la aparición de complicaciones. Resultados: El seguimiento medio fue de 61 meses. Obtuvimos una mejoría en la mediana de 8 puntos en la escala de funcionalidad de Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel y de 6 puntos en la escala EVA de dolor percibido por el paciente. Registramos dos casos de aflojamiento acetabular, un caso de inestabilidad y tres infecciones de herida quirúrgica sin afectar al implante. Conclusiones: La utilización de implantes tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular podría constituir una opción válida en cirugía de revisión acetabular con defectos acetabulares complejos, presentando buenos resultados clínico-radiológicos y en cuanto a complicaciones y supervivencia de los implantes, debido a su buena fijación primaria y osteointegración.(AU)

Introduction: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. Objectives: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. Material and method: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analyzed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilization of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. Results: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. Conclusions: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.(AU)

[Translated article] Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery / Implantes de titanio trabecular en cirugía de revisión acetabular compleja

Introducción: La cirugía de revisión acetabular supone un reto quirúrgico sobre todo cuando aparecen los defectos óseos complejos, pues dificultan la fijación primaria y osteointegración de los implantes, lo que condiciona la aparición de complicaciones. Los cotilos de titanio trabecular intentan solventar estos problemas. Objetivos: Valorar los resultados clínico-radiológicos, la supervivencia de los implantes y aparición de complicaciones a medio plazo en cirugía de revisión acetabular en una serie de 37 recambios acetabulares con defectos óseos tipo IIIA y IIIB de Paprosky en los que se utilizó un implante de revisión tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular. Material y método: Realizamos un estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo de 37 casos con defectos acetabulares complejos (20 tipo IIIA y 17 tipo IIIB, cinco de ellos con discontinuidad pélvica) en los que se realizó recambio del componente acetabular por implantes de titanio trabecular entre los años 2011 y 2019. Analizamos resultados clínicos (dolor y funcionalidad) y parámetros radiológicos (restauración del centro de rotación de la cadera y la movilización de los implantes), así como la aparición de complicaciones. Resultados: El seguimiento medio fue de 61 meses. Obtuvimos una mejoría en la mediana de 8 puntos en la escala de funcionalidad de Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel y de 6 puntos en la escala EVA de dolor percibido por el paciente. Registramos dos casos de aflojamiento acetabular, un caso de inestabilidad y tres infecciones de herida quirúrgica sin afectar al implante. Conclusiones: La utilización de implantes tipo Cup-Cage de titanio trabecular podría constituir una opción válida en cirugía de revisión acetabular con defectos acetabulares complejos, presentando buenos resultados clínico-radiológicos y en cuanto a complicaciones y supervivencia de los implantes, debido a su buena fijación primaria y osteointegración.(AU)

Introduction: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. Objectives: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. Material and method: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analyzed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilization of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. Results: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D’Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. Conclusions: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.(AU)

[Translated article] Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analysed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilisation of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.

Trabecular titanium implants in complex acetabular revision surgery. / Implantes de titanio trabecular en cirugía de revisión acetabular compleja.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular revision surgery is a surgical challenge, especially when complex bone defects appear. This makes primary fixation and osseointegration of the implants difficult, which conditions the appearance of complications. Trabecular titanium implants attempt to solve these problems. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our clinical-radiological results, the survival of the implants and the appearance of mid-term complications in acetabular revision surgery in a series of 37 acetabular replacements with Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB bone defects in which a trabecular titanium Cup-Cage revision implant was used. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We conducted an observational, descriptive and retrospective study of 37 cases with complex acetabular defects (20 type IIIA and 17 type IIIB, five of them with pelvic discontinuity) in which the acetabular component was replaced by trabecular titanium cups between 2011 and 2019. We analyzed clinical results (pain and functionality) and radiological parameters (restoration of the hip rotation centre and the mobilization of the implants), as well as the appearance of complications. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 61 months. We obtained a median improvement of 8 points on the Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel functionality scale and 6 points on the VAS scale of pain perceived by the patient. We recorded two cases of acetabular loosening, one case of dislocation and three surgical wound infections without affecting the implant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of trabecular titanium Cup-Cage implants could be a valid option in acetabular revision surgery with complex acetabular defects, presenting good clinical and radiological results and in terms of complications and survival of the implants, mainly due to their good primary fixation and subsequent osseointegration.

Fracturas de acetábulo tratadas mediante osteosíntesis. Resultados a largo plazo / Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Long term outcomes

Resumen: Introducción: las fracturas de acetábulo constituyen entre el 0.3 y 0.6% total de fracturas observadas, siendo estás lesiones relativamente infrecuentes. Objetivo: evaluar los resultados clínico-radiológicos del tratamiento quirúrgico mediante osteosíntesis de fracturas acetabulares con un seguimiento mínimo de 11.5 años. El objetivo secundario fue determinar la tasa de fracaso de la cadera de estos pacientes e identificar los factores de riesgo implicados. Materia y métodos: analizamos retrospectivamente una muestra de 23 pacientes intervenidos de fractura acetabular mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna, con un seguimiento medio de 14 años (11.5-17.5). Clasificamos las fracturas según Judet y Letournel en simples y complejas. Analizamos la evolución clínica y radiológica de estos pacientes mediante la escala de Harris. Resultados: obtuvimos una puntuación media de 81.90/100, objetivamos mejores resultados en fracturas de trazo simple respecto a fracturas complejas (p = 0.027). Evidenciamos mejores resultados clínicos en los pacientes con una reducción anatómica de la fractura (86.9/100), respecto a los que no fue posible (74.38/100) (p = 0.033). Fue necesaria la reintervención con artroplastía por mala evolución clínica en tres pacientes (13%). Como predictores de mal pronóstico para el desarrollo de coxartrosis identificamos las fracturas complejas y la reducción no anatómica de la fractura (p < 0.05). Encontramos relación entre índice de masa corporal (IMC) > 30 con peores resultados funcionales (p = 0.151). Conclusiones: el tratamiento quirúrgico de pacientes tratados con fracturas acetabulares presenta buenos resultados clínicos y radiológicos a largo plazo. Como factores de riesgo para la progresión de coxartrosis con suficiente impronta clínica como para ser necesaria una artroplastía identificamos, las fracturas complejas, la reducción no anatómica y un IMC > 30.

Abstract: Introduction: acetabular fractures constitute between 0.3 and 0.6% of all observed fractures, being these injuries relatively infrequent. Objective: to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with acetabular fracture treated in our hospital with a minimal follow-up of 11.5 years. The secondary objective is to determine the rate of failure in the hip joint of these patients and establish risk factors that are involved. Material and methods: 23 patients with acetabular fractures that were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were retrospectively analysed. They were follow-up during an average of 14 years (range 11.5-17.5). Fractures were classified by Judet y Letournel as simple or complex. Clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed by Harris scale. Results: We obtained an average of 81.90/100 on the Harris scale, aiming at better outcomes on simple fractures compare to those that were complex (p = 0.027). Higher scores were also achieved on those patients with an anatomical reduction (p = 0.033). Three patients required revision and placement of a total arthoplasty (13%). However, patients with body mass index (BMI) > 30 tend to achieve poor clinical results (p = 0.151). Conclusions: ORIF may be suggested for acetabular fractures since good clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded on a long-term follow-up. Complex fractures, non-anatomical reduction and BMI > 30 were identified as risk factors to coxarthrosis progression.

Fracturas metafisarias de tibia distal: analisis comparativo de los resultados obtenidos mediante placa bloqueada y clavo intramedular / Metaphysary fractures of the distal tibia: Comparative analysis of the results obtained by means of a blocked plate and intramedular nail

Introducción Las fracturas del tercio distal de tibia son en su mayoría consecuencia de un traumatismo de alta energía con importante afectación de partes blandas siendo mas frecuentes en varones. Este tipo de fracturas se diferencian de la fractura articular de pilón tibial en su mecanismo de lesión, manejo y pronóstico. El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar y comparar los resultados obtenidos en el tratamiento de las fracturas de tercio distal de tibia sin extensión articular mediante placa bloqueada y clavo intramedular. Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron todos los pacientes con diagnostico «fractura de tercio distal de tibia» segmento 43A según la clasificación propuesta por «Trauma Orthopedic Association» intervenidos entre enero del 2015 y mayo del 2019. Obtuvimos 24 pacientes intervenidos mediante clavo intramedular y 29 mediante placa bloqueada. Resultados: La muestra incluyó 53 pacientes (36 varones y 17 mujeres) con una media de edad de 51 años (rango: 15-77 años). El tiempo de seguimiento medio fue de 6 meses (3-30 meses). No se hallaron diferencias significativas en el tiempo de consolidación de la fractura, aunque el inicio de la deambulación con carga fue mas temprano en el grupo clavo. Discusión: En la actualidad no existe consenso acerca del manejo terapeútico de las fracturas distales de tibia sin extensión articular. Conclusiones: Dados los resultados obtenidos consideramos que tanto la osteosíntesis con clavo intramedular como con placa bloqueada son opciones válidas en el tratamiento de las fracturas del tercio distal de tibia.(AU)

Introduction: Fractures of the distal third of the tibia are mostly the consequence of high-energy trauma with significant soft tissue involvement, being more frequent in men.These types of fractures differ from the tibial pilon joint fracture in their mechanism of injury, management and prognosis. The objective of the present study was to analyze and compare the results obtained in the treatment of fractures of the distal third of the tibia without joint extension using a locked plate and intramedullary nail. Material and methods: We carried out a retrospective study with patients diagnosed of “distal third tibia fracture” segment 43A according to the classification proposed by the “Trauma Orthopedic Association” who were intervened between January 2015 and May 2019 were included. We obtained 24 patients intervened with a nail intramedullary and 29 using a blocked plate. Results: The study included 53 patients, 36 men and 17 women with a mean age of 51 years (range: 15-77 years). The mean follow-up time was 6 months (3–30 months). No significant differences were found in the time to fracture healing, although the beginning with load walking was earlier in the nail group. Discussion: Currently there is no consensus on the therapeutic management of distal tibia fractures without joint extension. Conclusions: After analyzing the results, we consider that both intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and a locked plate are valid options in the treatment of fractures of the distal third of the tibia.(AU)

Metaphysary fractures of the distal tibia: Comparative analysis of the results obtained by means of a blocked plate and intramedular nail / Fracturas metafisarias de tibia distal: Análisis comparativo de los resultados obtenidos mediante placa bloqueada y clavo intramedular

Introduction: Fractures of the distal third of the tibia are mostly the consequence of high-energy trauma with significant soft tissue involvement, being more frequent in men.These types of fractures differ from the tibial pilon joint fracture in their mechanism of injury, management and prognosis. The objective of the present study was to analyze and compare the results obtained in the treatment of fractures of the distal third of the tibia without joint extension using a locked plate and intramedullary nail. Material and methods: We carried out a retrospective study with patients diagnosed of “distal third tibia fracture” segment 43A according to the classification proposed by the “Trauma Orthopedic Association” who were intervened between January 2015 and May 2019 were included. We obtained 24 patients intervened with a nail intramedullary and 29 using a blocked plate. Results: The study included 53 patients, 36 men and 17 women with a mean age of 51 years (range: 15-77 years). The mean follow-up time was 6 months (3–30 months). No significant differences were found in the time to fracture healing, although the beginning with load walking was earlier in the nail group. Discussion: Currently there is no consensus on the therapeutic management of distal tibia fractures without joint extension. Conclusions: After analyzing the results, we consider that both intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and a locked plate are valid options in the treatment of fractures of the distal third of the tibia.(AU)

Introducción Las fracturas del tercio distal de tibia son en su mayoría consecuencia de un traumatismo de alta energía con importante afectación de partes blandas siendo mas frecuentes en varones. Este tipo de fracturas se diferencian de la fractura articular de pilón tibial en su mecanismo de lesión, manejo y pronóstico. El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar y comparar los resultados obtenidos en el tratamiento de las fracturas de tercio distal de tibia sin extensión articular mediante placa bloqueada y clavo intramedular. Material y métodos: Realizamos un estudio retrospectivo en el que se incluyeron todos los pacientes con diagnostico «fractura de tercio distal de tibia» segmento 43A según la clasificación propuesta por «Trauma Orthopedic Association» intervenidos entre enero del 2015 y mayo del 2019. Obtuvimos 24 pacientes intervenidos mediante clavo intramedular y 29 mediante placa bloqueada. Resultados: La muestra incluyó 53 pacientes (36 varones y 17 mujeres) con una media de edad de 51 años (rango: 15-77 años). El tiempo de seguimiento medio fue de 6 meses (3-30 meses). No se hallaron diferencias significativas en el tiempo de consolidación de la fractura, aunque el inicio de la deambulación con carga fue mas temprano en el grupo clavo. Discusión: En la actualidad no existe consenso acerca del manejo terapeútico de las fracturas distales de tibia sin extensión articular. Conclusiones: Dados los resultados obtenidos consideramos que tanto la osteosíntesis con clavo intramedular como con placa bloqueada son opciones válidas en el tratamiento de las fracturas del tercio distal de tibia.(AU)

Metaphysary fractures of the distal tibia: Comparative analysis of the results obtained by means of a blocked plate and intramedular nail. / Fracturas metafisarias de tibia distal: analisis comparativo de los resultados obtenidos mediante placa bloqueada y clavo intramedular.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the distal third of the tibia are mostly the consequence of high-energy trauma with significant soft tissue involvement, being more frequent in men. These types of fractures differ from the tibial pilon joint fracture in their mechanism of injury, management and prognosis. The objective of the present study was to analyze and compare the results obtained in the treatment of fractures of the distal third of the tibia without joint extension using a locked plate and intramedullary nail. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study with patients diagnosed of "distal third tibia fracture" segment 43A according to the classification proposed by the "Trauma Orthopedic Association" who were intervened between January 2015 and May 2019 were included. We obtained 24 patients intervened with a nail intramedullary and 29 using a blocked plate. RESULTS: The study included 53 patients, 36 men and 17 women with a mean age of 51 years (range: 15-77 years). The mean follow-up time was 6 months (3-30 months). No significant differences were found in the time to fracture healing, although the beginning with load walking was earlier in the nail group. DISCUSSION: Currently there is no consensus on the therapeutic management of distal tibia fractures without joint extension. CONCLUSIONS: After analyzing the results, we consider that both intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and a locked plate are valid options in the treatment of fractures of the distal third of the tibia.

[Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Long term outcomes]. / Fracturas de acetábulo tratadas mediante osteosíntesis. Resultados a largo plazo.

INTRODUCTION: acetabular fractures constitute between 0.3 and 0.6% of all observed fractures, being these injuries relatively infrequent. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with acetabular fracture treated in our hospital with a minimal follow-up of 11.5 years. The secondary objective is to determine the rate of failure in the hip joint of these patients and establish risk factors that are involved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 23 patients with acetabular fractures that were treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were retrospectively analysed. They were follow-up during an average of 14 years (range 11.5-17.5). Fractures were classified by Judet y Letournel as simple or complex. Clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed by Harris scale. RESULTS: We obtained an average of 81.90/100 on the Harris scale, aiming at better outcomes on simple fractures compare to those that were complex (p = 0.027). Higher scores were also achieved on those patients with an anatomical reduction (p = 0.033). Three patients required revision and placement of a total arthoplasty (13%). However, patients with body mass index (BMI) > 30 tend to achieve poor clinical results (p = 0.151). CONCLUSIONS: ORIF may be suggested for acetabular fractures since good clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded on a long-term follow-up. Complex fractures, non-anatomical reduction and BMI > 30 were identified as risk factors to coxarthrosis progression.

INTRODUCCIÓN: las fracturas de acetábulo constituyen entre el 0.3 y 0.6% total de fracturas observadas, siendo estás lesiones relativamente infrecuentes. OBJETIVO: evaluar los resultados clínico-radiológicos del tratamiento quirúrgico mediante osteosíntesis de fracturas acetabulares con un seguimiento mínimo de 11.5 años. El objetivo secundario fue determinar la tasa de fracaso de la cadera de estos pacientes e identificar los factores de riesgo implicados. MATERIA Y MÉTODOS: analizamos retrospectivamente una muestra de 23 pacientes intervenidos de fractura acetabular mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna, con un seguimiento medio de 14 años (11.5-17.5). Clasificamos las fracturas según Judet y Letournel en simples y complejas. Analizamos la evolución clínica y radiológica de estos pacientes mediante la escala de Harris. RESULTADOS: obtuvimos una puntuación media de 81.90/100, objetivamos mejores resultados en fracturas de trazo simple respecto a fracturas complejas (p = 0.027). Evidenciamos mejores resultados clínicos en los pacientes con una reducción anatómica de la fractura (86.9/100), respecto a los que no fue posible (74.38/100) (p = 0.033). Fue necesaria la reintervención con artroplastía por mala evolución clínica en tres pacientes (13%). Como predictores de mal pronóstico para el desarrollo de coxartrosis identificamos las fracturas complejas y la reducción no anatómica de la fractura (p < 0.05). Encontramos relación entre índice de masa corporal (IMC) > 30 con peores resultados funcionales (p = 0.151). CONCLUSIONES: el tratamiento quirúrgico de pacientes tratados con fracturas acetabulares presenta buenos resultados clínicos y radiológicos a largo plazo. Como factores de riesgo para la progresión de coxartrosis con suficiente impronta clínica como para ser necesaria una artroplastía identificamos, las fracturas complejas, la reducción no anatómica y un IMC > 30.

[Femoral revision surgery with fully coated stems. Long-term results of 78 cases]. / Cirugía de revisión femoral con vástagos monobloque de recubrimiento completo. Resultados a largo plazo de 78 casos.

INTRODUCTION: Loss of bone stock and anatomical alteration of the proximal femur make femoral revision surgery a complex procedure in which the choice of implant will be critical. Our goal is to assess the clinical and radiological results of complete coating Monoblock stems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 78 consecutive cases of femoral review surgery intervened by our unit. RESULTS: The average follow-up was 122 months. The average score on the Harris Hip Score was 81.2 ± 11.4 points. An age of less than 65 years, a minor femoral defect according to Paprosky classification (I, II and IIIA), the existence of a single previous surgery and the non-occurrence of intra or postoperative complications, was associated with better clinical and functional outcomes (p < 0.05).Cumulative survival was 96.7% at age 10 if we consider as failure the removal of the stem by aseptic loosening and 92% if we consider withdrawal for any cause to fail. CONCLUSION: Despite the current tendency to use modularity in femoral review surgery and given the results presented, we consider that complete coating monoblock stems provide a firm and stable fixation. However, the worst results in patients with major defects have led to other options being considered.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La pérdida de stock óseo y la alteración anatómica del fémur proximal hacen de la cirugía de revisión femoral un procedimiento complejo en la que la elección del implante será fundamental. Nuestro objetivo es valorar los resultados clínicos y radiológicos de los vástagos monobloque de recubrimiento completo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de 78 casos consecutivos de cirugía de revisión femoral intervenidos por nuestra unidad. RESULTADOS: El seguimiento medio fue de 122 meses. La puntuación media en la escala de Harris Hip Score fue de 81.2 ± 11.4 puntos. Una edad menor de 65 años, un defecto femoral menor según la clasificación de Paprosky (I, II y IIIA), la existencia de una única cirugía previa y la no aparición de complicaciones intraoperatorias o postoperatorias se asoció con mejores resultados clínicos y funcionales (p < 0.05). La supervivencia acumulada fue de 96.7% a los 10 años si consideramos como fracaso la retirada del vástago por aflojamiento aséptico y de 92% si consideramos como fracaso la retirada por cualquier causa. CONCLUSIÓN: Pese a la tendencia actual al uso de la modularidad en cirugía de revisión femoral y dados los resultados presentados, consideramos que los vástagos monobloque de recubrimiento completo proporcionan una fijación firme y estable. Sin embargo, los peores resultados obtenidos en pacientes con defectos óseos mayores han provocado que se valore otro tipo de opciones.

Treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures by reconstruction plate. Results and complications of 86 fractures. / Tratamiento de las fracturas intraarticulares de calcáneo mediante placa de reconstrucción. Resultados y complicaciones de 86 fracturas.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of surgical treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures, and also to analyze the variables that influence the final clinical and radiological outcomes as well as the complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 86 intraarticular calcaneal fractures in 78 patients, who underwent surgery with an extended lateral approach and reconstruction plate. The mean age was 48 years (16-74 years) and the mean follow-up was 4.6 years (9-99 months); 54 patients (69.2%) suffered falls from less than 3m in height or banal injuries and 24 patients (30.8%) falls from more than 3m in height or high energy-accidents. According to the Sanders classification we operated 12 (15%) typeII, 54 (62.8%) typeIII and 20 (23.2%) typeIV fractures. RESULTS: The postoperative mean AOFAS score was 73.9 points, with good or excellent results in 57% of the patients. Twelve cases (14%) suffered surgical wound complications and 11 (12.8%) required subtalar arthrodesis. Significantly better results were obtained in the patients younger than 30 years old, patients that fell from less than 3m in height and patients with Sanders fractures types II and III compared to typeIV, which were associated with higher rate of subtalar arthrodesis. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that open reduction and internal fixation of intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus with reconstruction plate is a valid treatment alternative. Given the complications described and the secondary subtalar arthrodesis rate, we recommend a meticulous technique carried out by experienced surgeons.

[Acetabular fractures: short-term results]. / Fracturas de acetábulo. Resultados a corto plazo.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures, and to discern which variables influence the final radiological and clinical outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 23 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fracture with a mean age of 40.4 years (17-72 years). Mean follow-up was 4 years (1.5-7.5 years). According to Judet and Letournel classification, we operated 10 simple fractures (43.5%) and 13 complex (56.5%), with both-column fractures being the most common type (8 hips). We evaluated the quality of reduction achieved, the clinical results and the occurrence of coxarthrosis. RESULTS: We obtained anatomic reduction of the lesion in 12 cases (52%), in 7 (30%) residual displacement was less than 2mm, and in 4 patients (17%) greater than 2mm. According to Harris' score, the clinical outcome was excellent or good in 18 cases (78%) and fair or poor in 5 (22%), getting worse in complex fractures and when we do not reach an anatomic reduction of the injury. Six patients (26%) developed moderate or severe degenerative changes during follow-up. The degree of postoperative reduction obtained was identified as the main predictor of the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The acquisition by open reduction and internal fixation of an accurate congruence between the femoral head and acetabulum is essential to achieve good long-term results.

Fracturas de acetábulo. Resultados a corto plazo / Acetabular fractures: short-term results

Objetivo. Evaluar los resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico de las fracturas desplazadas de acetábulo. Discernir que variables influyen en el resultado clínico y radiológico final. Material y métodos. Analizamos de forma retrospectiva 23 pacientes intervenidos de fractura acetabular mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna, con una edad media de 40,4 años (17-72 años). El seguimiento medio fue de 4 años (1,5-7,5 años). Según la clasificación de Judet y Letournel intervinimos 10 fracturas simples (43,5%) y 13 complejas (56,5%), siendo la fractura de ambas columnas la más frecuente (8 casos). Valoramos la calidad de la reducción obtenida, los resultados clínicos y la aparición de coxartrosis. Resultados. Obtuvimos una reducción anatómica de la lesión en 12 casos (52%), en 7 (30%) el desplazamiento residual fue menor de 2mm y en 4 pacientes (17%) mayor de 2mm. Según la escala de Harris, el resultado clínico fue excelente o bueno en 18 casos (78%) y aceptable o pobre en 5 (22%), obteniendo peores resultados en fracturas complejas y cuando no alcanzamos una reducción anatómica de la lesión. Seis pacientes (26%) habían desarrollado cambios degenerativos moderados o severos al final del seguimiento. El grado de reducción postquirúrgica obtenida fue identificado como el principal predictor de desarrollo de coxartrosis postraumática. Discusión y conclusiones. La obtención mediante reducción abierta y fijación interna de una correcta congruencia entre la cabeza femoral y el acetábulo es esencial para lograr buenos resultados a largo plazo (AU)

Objective. To evaluate the results of surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures, and to discern which variables influence the final radiological and clinical outcome. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 23 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fracture with a mean age of 40.4 years (17-72 years). Mean follow-up was 4 years (1.5-7.5 years). According to Judet and Letournel classification, we operated 10 simple fractures (43.5%) and 13 complex (56.5%), with both-column fractures being the most common type (8 hips). We evaluated the quality of reduction achieved, the clinical results and the occurrence of coxarthrosis. Results. We obtained anatomic reduction of the lesion in 12 cases (52%), in 7 (30%) residual displacement was less than 2mm, and in 4 patients (17%) greater than 2mm. According to Harris’ score, the clinical outcome was excellent or good in 18 cases (78%) and fair or poor in 5 (22%), getting worse in complex fractures and when we do not reach an anatomic reduction of the injury. Six patients (26%) developed moderate or severe degenerative changes during follow-up. The degree of postoperative reduction obtained was identified as the main predictor of the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Discussion and conclusions. The acquisition by open reduction and internal fixation of an accurate congruence between the femoral head and acetabulum is essential to achieve good long-term results (AU)