Authorized Agent-Controlled Analgesia for Pain Management in Critically Ill Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient-controlled analgesia is commonly used for adult patients requiring parenteral opioid analgesia in the postoperative setting. However, many patients are unable to use patient-controlled analgesia because of physical or cognitive limitations. Authorized agent-controlled analgesia, in which a nurse or family member activates the patient-controlled analgesia device, has been studied in the pediatric population but has received little attention in adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of authorized agent-controlled analgesia in critically ill adult patients. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study was conducted involving 46 patients who were placed on an authorized agent-controlled analgesia protocol in a mixed medical/surgical adult intensive care unit. Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool scores were abstracted for the 24 hours before and after initiation of authorized agent-controlled analgesia. Authorized agent-controlled analgesia was administered by nurses only. RESULTS: The mean (SD) change in pain score was -3.4 (2.0) (95% CI, -4.0 to -2.7), representing a 69% decrease in the mean (SD) pain score from before to after initiation of authorized agent-controlled analgesia (4.8 [1.8] vs 1.5 [1.6]; P < .001). When the results were controlled for time, sedative administration, and opioid medication administration, the effect of authorized agent-controlled analgesia initiation on pain scores remained significant (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Use of authorized agent-controlled analgesia is associated with a reduction in pain in critically ill patients. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Current Management of Gynecologic Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: To date, there are few reports describing the management of traumatic gynecologic injuries leaving physicians with little guidance. OBJECTIVE: Describe the injury patterns and the preferred management of these injuries. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from years 2011 to 2013. Female patients age 16 years and older with internal gynecologic injuries were identified based on diagnosis codes. Demographics, associated diagnoses and procedure codes were compiled for the cohort. RESULTS: 313 patients met inclusion criteria. The mechanism of injury was blunt in 236 (75%) patients, penetrating in 68 (21%), and other in 9 (4%). The mean Injury Severity Score was 16.6 ± 14.6. Mean age was 34 ± 21 years old. 226 (74.8%) patients had an ovarian and/or fallopian tube injury, 71 (25.2%) had a uterine injury, 8 (3%) had both, and 8 (3%) had injury to the ovarian or uterine vessels only. Of the 226 patients with ovarian and/or fallopian tube injury, 11(5%) underwent repair and 10 (4%) underwent salpingo-oophorectomy. Of the 71 uterine injuries, 15 (21%) underwent repair and 5 (7%) required a hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Most traumatic internal gynecologic injuries result from blunt mechanism. Currently, these injuries are largely managed non-operatively. When surgery was performed, ovarian and uterine repair was more common than salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy. Prospective large-scale studies are needed to establish a standard of treatment for the management of gynecologic trauma and to assess both short and long term outcomes and fertility rates.

Trauma team size and task performance in adult trauma resuscitations.

BACKGROUND: The initial evaluation of a trauma patient involves multiple personnel from various disciplines. Whereas this approach can expedite care, an increasing number of personnel can also create chaos and hinder efficiency. We sought to determine the optimal number of persons associated with an expedient primary survey. METHODS: Audio and/or video recordings of all consecutive adult trauma evaluations at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed for a 1-month period. A 20-task checklist was developed based on Advanced Trauma Life Support principles. The number of practitioners present (TeamN) and tasks completed at 2 and 5 min (Task2, Task5) were recorded. The association between TeamN, demographics, presence of attending surgeon, and team leader engagement and Task2/Task5 was measured the using chi square test and Spearman correlation. A multivariate regression model was developed. RESULTS: A total of 170 cases were reviewed, 44 of which were top-tier activations. Average TeamN was 6 ± 2 persons. Task2 and Task5 were significantly positively correlated with TeamN (r = 0.34, P < 0.0001; r = 0.22, P = 0.004, respectively) and leader engagement (r = 0.27, P < 0.01; r = 0.16, P < 0.05, respectively). There was a significant positive correlation between TeamN and Task2 and Task5. Only TeamN had a significant, independent association with Task2 and Task5 (P = 0.005). We did not find a size that was negatively associated with task completion. Only assessment of breath sounds was negatively associated with increasing team size. CONCLUSIONS: TeamN is significantly associated with efficiency of trauma evaluation. Studies evaluating reasons for this and the effect of maximal team size are needed to determine optimal trauma team staffing.