Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias: results of transabdominal and transthoracic surgical approaches at a fourth-level hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to elucidate the clinical and demographic profiles, as well as perioperative outcomes, of patients undergoing surgery for non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias. Additionally, it aims to analyse these outcomes based on the surgical approach employed (transthoracic versus transabdominal). METHODS: This retrospective, observational study was conducted at a single center and involved patients diagnosed with non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernia who underwent either emergency or elective surgery between July 2007 and March 2023. Clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of these patients were compared using appropriate statistical tests.The research protocol for this observational, retrospective, and comparative study followed the Declaration of Helsinki's ethical requirements. The need for Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval was waived according to our institutional law because the study was a retrospective cohort study based on anonymous data of patients. Informed consent was waived because this study involved the secondary analysis of patient medical records. Additionally, this study followed the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies. RESULTS: The analysis included 22 patients being 59.1% men, with median age of 61 years. The predominant clinical presentation was restrictive lung disease (40.9%). The majority of cases (68%) had traumatic aetiology with a median defect size of 4 cm (range of 3-8 cm). Elective surgery was performed in 15 cases (68.1%) and transthoracic approach was employed in 13 patients (54.5%). Postoperative major morbidity reached 27.2% and mortality within 30 days was 9.1%. Emergency surgeries accounted for 44.4% of transabdominal interventions, compared to 23% in the transthoracic subgroup (p = 0.376). There were no statistically significant differences between the transabdominal and trasnthoracic approaches in terms of global postoperative complications (88.8% vs. 84.6%, p = 1), major complications (44.4% vs 15.4%, p = 0.734), mortality (11.1% v 7.6%, p = 1) and recurrence (11.1% vs 7.6%, p = 1). Postoperative stay was significantly shorter in the transthoracic subgroup (6 days vs. 14 days, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Non-hiatal diaphragmatic hernias are characterized by significant postoperative major morbidity and mortality rates, standing at 27.2% and 9.1%, respectively, accompanied by a recurrence rate of 9.1%. Both transthoracic and transabdominal approaches demonstrate comparable short- and long-term outcomes.

Operative outcomes and middle-term survival of robotic-assisted lung resection for clinical stage IA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery / Resultados postoperatorios y de supervivencia a medio plazo de las resecciones pulmonares asistidas por robot en el cáncer de pulmón en estadio clínico IA en comparación con la cirugía toracoscópica videoasistida

Background: Despite limited published evidence, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for anatomic lung resection in early-stage lung cancer continues growing. The aim of this study is to evaluate its safety and oncologic efficacy compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: Single-centre retrospective study of all patients with resected clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent RATS or VATS anatomic lung resection from June 2018 to January 2022. RATS and VATS cases were matched by propensity scoring (PSM) according to age, sex, histology, and type of resection. Short-term outcomes were compared, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 321 patients (94 RATS and 227 VATS cases) were included. After PSM, 94 VATS and 94 RATS cases were compared. Demographics, pulmonary function, and comorbidity were similar in both groups. Overall postoperative morbidity was comparable for RATS and VATS cases (20.2% vs 25.5%, P = 0.385, respectively). Pathological nodal upstaging was similar in both groups (10.6% in RATS and 12.8% in VATS). During the 3.5-year follow-up period (median: 29 months; IQR: 18–39), recurrence rate was 6.4% in RATS group and 18.1% in the VATS group (P = 0.014). OS and DFS were similar in RATS and VATS groups (log rank P = 0.848 and P = 0.117, respectively). Conclusion: RATS can be performed safely in patients with early-stage NSCLC. For clinical stage IA disease, robotic anatomic lung resection offers better oncologic outcomes in terms of recurrence, although there are no differences in OS and DFS compared with VATS.(AU)

Introducción: A pesar de la limitada evidencia disponible, el uso de la RATS en resecciones pulmonares anatómicas por cáncer continúa creciendo. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar su seguridad y eficacia oncológica en comparación con la VATS. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo unicéntrico en el que se incluyeron todos los pacientes con CPNM en estadio cIA sometidos a resección pulmonar anatómica RATS o VATS entre junio de 2018 y enero de 2022. Los casos se emparejaron mediante puntuación de propensión (PSM) según edad, sexo, histología y tipo de resección. Se compararon los resultados a corto plazo y la supervivencia global (OS) y libre de enfermedad (DFS) mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier y la prueba de rangos logarítmicos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 321 pacientes (94 RATS y 227 VATS). Tras el PSM, se compararon 94 VATS y 94 RATS. La morbilidad global fue comparable en ambos grupos (20.2 % en RATS vs 25.5 % en VATS, P = 0.385). El upstaging ganglionar fue similar en ambos abordajes (10.6% en RATS y 12.8% en VATS). Durante los 3.5 años de seguimiento, la tasa de recurrencia fue del 6.4 % en RATS y del 18.1 % en VATS (P = 0.014). OS y DFS fueron similares en los dos grupos (rango logarítmico P = 0.848 y P = 0.117, respectivamente). Conclusión: La RATS se puede realizar de forma segura en pacientes con CPNM en estadio inicial. Para la enfermedad en estadio cIA, el abordaje robótico ofrece mejores resultados en términos de recurrencia, aunque no hay diferencias en la OS y la DFS en comparación con la VATS.(AU)

Operative outcomes and middle-term survival of robotic-assisted lung resection for clinical stage IA lung cancer compared with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite limited published evidence, robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for anatomic lung resection in early-stage lung cancer continues growing. The aim of this study is to evaluate its safety and oncologic efficacy compared to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: Single-centre retrospective study of all patients with resected clinical stage IA NSCLC who underwent RATS or VATS anatomic lung resection from June 2018 to January 2022. RATS and VATS cases were matched by propensity scoring (PSM) according to age, sex, histology, and type of resection. Short-term outcomes were compared, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: 321 patients (94 RATS and 227 VATS cases) were included. After PSM, 94 VATS and 94 RATS cases were compared. Demographics, pulmonary function, and comorbidity were similar in both groups. Overall postoperative morbidity was comparable for RATS and VATS cases (20.2% vs 25.5%, P = 0.385, respectively). Pathological nodal upstaging was similar in both groups (10.6% in RATS and 12.8% in VATS). During the 3.5-year follow-up period (median: 29 months; IQR: 18-39), recurrence rate was 6.4% in RATS group and 18.1% in the VATS group (P = 0.014). OS and DFS were similar in RATS and VATS groups (log rank P = 0.848 and P = 0.117, respectively). CONCLUSION: RATS can be performed safely in patients with early-stage NSCLC. For clinical stage IA disease, robotic anatomic lung resection offers better oncologic outcomes in terms of recurrence, although there are no differences in OS and DFS compared with VATS.

Autologous mesenchymal stromal cells embedded with Tissucol Duo® for prevention of air leak after anatomical lung resection: results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial with long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged air leak (PAL) is the most frequent complication after pulmonary resection. Several measures have been described to prevent the occurrence of PAL in high-risk patients, however, the potential role of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) applied in the parenchymal suture line to prevent postoperative air leak in this setting has not been fully addressed. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the feasibility, safety and potential clinical efficacy of the implantation of autologous MSCs embedded in Tissucol Duo® as a prophylactic alternative to prevent postoperative prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection in high-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN: Phase I/II single-arm prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Six patients with high risk of PAL undergoing elective pulmonary resection were included. Autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs were expanded at our Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Facility and implanted (embedded in a Tissucol Duo® carrier) in the parenchymal suture line during pulmonary resection surgery. Patients were monitored in the early postoperative period and evaluated for possible complications or adverse reactions. In addition, all patients were followed-up to 5 years for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The median age of patients included was 66 years (range: 55-70 years), and male/female ratio was 5/1. Autologous MSCs were expanded in five cases, in one case MSCs expansion was insufficient. There were no adverse effects related to cell implantation. Regarding efficacy, median air leak duration was 0 days (range: 0-2 days). The incidence of PAL was nil. Radiologically, only one patient presented pneumothorax in the chest X-ray at discharge. No adverse effects related to the procedure were recorded during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of autologous MSCs for prevention of PAL in patients with high risk of PAL is feasible, safe and potentially effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: EudraCT: 2013-000535-27. CLINICALTRIALS: gov idenfier: NCT02045745.

The importance of standardizing criteria for PGT-A interpretation of blastocysts analyzed by next-generation sequencing.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) results using the three most frequent criteria employed by preimplantation genetic laboratories and evaluate its impact on the number of euploid embryos available for transfer. METHODS: Retrospective and descriptive study including patients who underwent PGT-A between January 2018 and December 2020. Five hundred and nine PGT-A cycles and 2,079 blastocysts were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). We re-assigned the diagnosis of all blastocysts using three different criteria: strict (mosaicism thresholds from 20% to 80%), standard (from 30% to 70%) and excluding (mosaicism is not reported). We compared the euploid, aneuploid and mosaic embryos obtained in each criteria used. RESULTS: We observed PGT-A results discrepancies in 32.5% (165/509) of the cycles when the three different criteria were applied. The standard and excluding criteria showed 92 more euploid embryos (875/2,079) compared to the strict criteria (783/2,079). Evaluating the PGT-A results per cycle with the strict, standard and excluding criteria, the euploidy rates were 34.0%, 38.4% and 38.4% (p<0.001); aneuploidy rates were 59.0%, 55.8% and 61.6% (p<0.001) and mosaic rates were 7.0% and 5.8% (p<0.047), respectively. The mean number of euploid blastocysts available for transfer was 1.54±1.67 with the strict criteria, while the possibility to obtain an euploid embryo was higher if the standard or the excluding criteria were used 1.72±1.78 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of standardizing the criteria used for the interpretation of PGT-A blastocysts. We observed significant differences on PGT-A results associated solely to the criteria used.

Failure to rescue following anatomical lung resection. Analysis of a prospective nationwide database.

Background: Rescue failure has been described as an important factor that conditions postoperative mortality after surgical interventions. The objective of this study is to determine the incidence and main determinants of failure to rescue after anatomical lung resections. Methods: Prospective multicenter study that included all patients undergoing anatomical pulmonary resection between December 2016 and March 2018 and registered in the Spanish nationwide database GEVATS. Postoperative complications were classified as minor (grades I and II) and major (grades IIIa to V) according to the Clavien-Dindo standardized classification. Patients that died after a major complication were considered rescue failure. A stepwise logistic regression model was created to identify predictors of failure to rescue. Results: 3,533 patients were analyzed. In total, 361 cases (10.2%) had major complications, of which 59 (16.3%) could not be rescued. The variables associated with rescue failure were: ppoDLCO% (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1; p = 0.067), cardiac comorbidity (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4; p = 0.024), extended resection (OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.94-5.41; p = 0.067), pneumonectomy (OR, 2.53; 95 CI, 1.07-6.03; p = 0.036) and hospital volume <120 cases per year (OR, 2.53; CI 95%, 1.26-5.07; p = 0.009). The area under the curve of the ROC curve was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64-0.79). Conclusion: A significant percentage of patients who presented major complications after anatomical lung resection did not survive to discharge. Pneumonectomy and annual surgical volume are the risk factors most closely related to rescue failure. Complex thoracic surgical pathology should be concentrated in high-volume centers to obtain the best results in potentially high-risk patients.

Factores predictores de estancia hospitalaria prolongada tras resección pulmonar anatómica / Predictive factors of prolonged postoperative length of stay after anatomic pulmonary resection

Introducción: El objetivo de este estudio es crear un modelo predictivo de estancia postoperatoria prolongada (EPP) en pacientes sometidos a resección pulmonar anatómica, validarlo en una serie externa y evaluar la influencia de la EPP en el reingreso y la mortalidad a 90 días. Métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes registrados en la base de datos del GEVATS dados de alta tras la intervención. Definimos la EPP como la permanencia postoperatoria en días por encima del percentil 75 de estancia de todos los pacientes de la serie. Se realizó un análisis univariable y multivariable mediante regresión logística y el modelo fue validado en una cohorte externa. Se analizó la posible asociación entre la EPP y el reingreso y la mortalidad a 90 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio 3473 pacientes. La mediana de estancia postoperatoria fue de 5 días (RIQ:4-7). Ochocientos quince pacientes tuvieron una EPP (≥8 días), de los que el 79,9% presentaron complicaciones postoperatorias. El modelo final incluyó como variables: edad, IMC, sexo varón, VEF1%ppo, DLCO%ppo y toracotomía; el AUC en la serie de derivación fue de 0,684 (IC95%: 0,661-0,706) y en la de validación de 0,73 (IC95%: 0,681-0,78). Se encontró una asociación significativa entre la EPP y el reingreso (p<0,000) y la mortalidad a 90 días (p<0,000). Conclusiones: Las variables edad, IMC, sexo varón, VEF1%ppo, DLCO%ppo y toracotomía afectan a la EPP. La EPP se asocia con un incremento del riesgo de reingreso y mortalidad a 90 días. El 20% de las EPP no se relacionan con la ocurrencia de complicaciones postoperatorias. (AU)

Introduction: The objective of this study is to create a predictive model of prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS) in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection, to validate it in an external series and to evaluate the influence of PLOS on readmission and 90-day mortality. Methods: All patients registered in the GEVATS database discharged after the intervention were included. We define PLOS as the postoperative stay in days above the 75th percentile of stay for all patients in the series. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and the model was validated in an external cohort. The possible association between PPE and readmission and mortality at 90 days was analyzed. Results: 3473 patients were included in the study. The median postoperative stay was 5 days (IQR: 4–7). 815 patients had PLOS (≥8 days), of which 79.9% had postoperative complications. The final model included as variables: age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy; the AUC in the referral series was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.661–0.706) and in the validation series was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.681–0.78). A significant association was found between PLOS and readmission (p<.000) and 90-day mortality (p<.000). Conclusions: The variables age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy affect PLOS. PLOS is associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-day mortality. 20% of PLOS are not related to the occurrence of postoperative complications. (AU)

Factores predictores de estancia hospitalaria prolongada tras resección pulmonar anatómica / Predictive factors of prolonged postoperative length of stay after anatomic pulmonary resection

Introducción: El objetivo de este estudio es crear un modelo predictivo de estancia postoperatoria prolongada (EPP) en pacientes sometidos a resección pulmonar anatómica, validarlo en una serie externa y evaluar la influencia de la EPP en el reingreso y la mortalidad a 90 días. Métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes registrados en la base de datos del GEVATS dados de alta tras la intervención. Definimos la EPP como la permanencia postoperatoria en días por encima del percentil 75 de estancia de todos los pacientes de la serie. Se realizó un análisis univariable y multivariable mediante regresión logística y el modelo fue validado en una cohorte externa. Se analizó la posible asociación entre la EPP y el reingreso y la mortalidad a 90 días. Resultados: Se incluyeron en el estudio 3473 pacientes. La mediana de estancia postoperatoria fue de 5 días (RIQ:4-7). Ochocientos quince pacientes tuvieron una EPP (≥8 días), de los que el 79,9% presentaron complicaciones postoperatorias. El modelo final incluyó como variables: edad, IMC, sexo varón, VEF1%ppo, DLCO%ppo y toracotomía; el AUC en la serie de derivación fue de 0,684 (IC95%: 0,661-0,706) y en la de validación de 0,73 (IC95%: 0,681-0,78). Se encontró una asociación significativa entre la EPP y el reingreso (p<0,000) y la mortalidad a 90 días (p<0,000). Conclusiones: Las variables edad, IMC, sexo varón, VEF1%ppo, DLCO%ppo y toracotomía afectan a la EPP. La EPP se asocia con un incremento del riesgo de reingreso y mortalidad a 90 días. El 20% de las EPP no se relacionan con la ocurrencia de complicaciones postoperatorias. (AU)

Introduction: The objective of this study is to create a predictive model of prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS) in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection, to validate it in an external series and to evaluate the influence of PLOS on readmission and 90-day mortality. Methods: All patients registered in the GEVATS database discharged after the intervention were included. We define PLOS as the postoperative stay in days above the 75th percentile of stay for all patients in the series. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and the model was validated in an external cohort. The possible association between PPE and readmission and mortality at 90 days was analyzed. Results: 3473 patients were included in the study. The median postoperative stay was 5 days (IQR: 4–7). 815 patients had PLOS (≥8 days), of which 79.9% had postoperative complications. The final model included as variables: age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy; the AUC in the referral series was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.661–0.706) and in the validation series was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.681–0.78). A significant association was found between PLOS and readmission (p<.000) and 90-day mortality (p<.000). Conclusions: The variables age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy affect PLOS. PLOS is associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-day mortality. 20% of PLOS are not related to the occurrence of postoperative complications. (AU)

Predictive factors of prolonged postoperative length of stay after anatomic pulmonary resection.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to create a predictive model of prolonged postoperative length of stay (PLOS) in patients undergoing anatomic lung resection, to validate it in an external series and to evaluate the influence of PLOS on readmission and 90-day mortality. METHODS: All patients registered in the GEVATS database discharged after the intervention were included. We define PLOS as the postoperative stay in days above the 75th percentile of stay for all patients in the series. A univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and the model was validated in an external cohort. The possible association between PLOS and readmission and mortality at 90 days was analyzed. RESULTS: 3473 patients were included in the study. The median postoperative stay was 5 days (IQR: 4-7). 815 patients had PLOS (≥8 days), of which 79.9% had postoperative complications. The final model included as variables: age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy; the AUC in the referral series was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.661-0.706) and in the validation series was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.681-0.78). A significant association was found between PLOS and readmission (p < .000) and 90-day mortality (p < .000). CONCLUSIONS: The variables age, BMI, male sex, ppoFEV1%, ppoDLCO% and thoracotomy affect PLOS. PLOS is associated with an increased risk of readmission and 90-day mortality. 20% of PLOS are not related to the occurrence of postoperative complications.

Repetición de la biopsia ante una falla en la amplificación / Repeat biopsy in case of amplification failure

Resumen OBJETIVO: Analizar los posibles factores asociados con las fallas en la amplificación, los desenlaces de la euploidia y clínicos entre los embriones con repetición de la biopsia y los de una sola (grupo control). MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo y multicéntrico de análisis de biopsias de blastocistos practicadas en 22 centros de reproducción asistida (noviembre 2017 a febrero 2022). Se analizaron 4,106 blastocistos procedentes de 1,007 ciclos de ICSI con prueba genética para aneuplidias previa a la implantación. En los blastocistos reportados con falla en la amplificación se analizó el Centro donde se practicó la biopsia, el día en que ésta se tomó, la calidad embrionaria y la incidencia de complicaciones durante el procedimiento. Los resultados se compararon con la prueba genética para aneuploidias previa a la implantación y los desenlaces clínicos entre los embriones con repetición de la biopsia y el grupo control. RESULTADOS: En el 96.0% (3,942) de los embriones se obtuvo resultado y en el 4.0% (n = 164) se reportó falla en la amplificación. La biopsia se repitió en las 99 fallas en la amplificación y se obtuvo resultado en el 83.8% de los casos. Las tasas de euploidia fueron similares entre embriones con repetición de la biopsia y los controles (34.9 en comparación con 39.7%; p > 0.05). El Centro fue el único factor que mostró diferencias en las tasas de falla en la amplificación (p < 0.05). No se observaron diferencias en el día de la biopsia o la calidad embrionaria. Las tasas de embarazo (51.0 en comparación con 58.3%), implantación (63.9 en comparación con 61.5%) y aborto (16.9 en comparación con 28.6%) fueron similares entre embriones con una sola biopsia o repetición de ésta, respectivamente. CONCLUSIONES: El Centro fue el principal factor que influyó en las fallas en la amplificación. Las tasas de euploidia y los desenlaces clínicos no difirieron entre el grupo control y los embriones con repetición de la biopsia; por consiguiente, se recomienda repetir la biopsia en los embriones con falla en la amplificación.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To analyze possible factors associated with amplification failures, euploidy and clinical outcomes between repeat and single biopsy embryos (control group). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study involving 4,106 blastocysts from 1,007 ICSI cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy performed by next generation sequencing. In case of DNA amplification failure, the IVF center where biopsies were performed, the day of biopsy, the embryo quality and the incidence of complications during biopsy were analyzed. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results and clinical outcomes were compared between re-biopsied embryos and the control group. RESULTS: Of the 4,106 blastocysts included in this study, 96.0% (3,942) obtained a result while 4.0% (164) had an amplification failure. Ninety-nine embryos with amplification failure were re-biopsied and 83.8% resulted in an informative diagnosis. Euploidy rates were equivalent between re-biopsied and control blastocysts (34.9% vs 39.7%, P>0.05). The only factor significantly affecting the amplification failure rates was the IVF center. No differences were observed between biopsy days or embryo quality. Pregnancy (51.0% vs 58.3%), implantation (63.9% vs 61.5%) and miscarriage rates (16.9% vs 28.6%) were similar between single and repeat biopsied embryos, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The centre was the main factor influencing amplification failures. Euploidy rates and clinical outcomes did not differ between the control group and repeat biopsied embryos; therefore, repeat biopsy is recommended for embryos with amplification failure.

Operating time: an independent and modifiable risk factor for short-term complications after video-thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The relationship between operating time and postoperative morbidity has not been fully characterized in lung resection surgery. We aimed to determine the variables associated with prolonged operative times and their influence on postoperative complications after video-thoracoscopic lobectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer from December 2016 to March 2018, within the prospective registry of the Spanish Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Group were identified. Operating time was stratified by quartiles and complication rates analysed using chi-squared test. Primary outcomes included 30-day overall, pulmonary and cardiovascular complications and wound infection. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables independently associated with operating time and their influence on the occurrence of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Data of 1518 cases were examined. The median operating time was 174 min (interquartile range: 130-210 min). Overall morbidity rates significantly increased with surgical duration (20.5% vs 34.4% in the 1st and 4th quartiles, respectively, P < 0.05) and so did pulmonary complications (14.6% vs 26.4% in the 1st and 4th quartiles, respectively, P < 0.05). Differences were not found regarding cardiovascular and wound complications. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, operating time remained as an independent risk factor for overall (odds ratios, 2.05) and pulmonary complications (odds ratios, 2.01). Male sex, predicted postoperative diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, number of lymphatic stations harvested, pleural adhesions, fissures completeness, lobectomy site, surgeon seniority, individual video-thoracoscopic surgeon experience and fissureless technique were identified as predictive factors for long operative time. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged operating time is associated with increased odds of postoperative complications. Modifiable factors contributing to prolonged operating time may serve as a target for quality improvement.