Anogenital distance and anti-Müllerian hormone combined improves the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of the combination of anogenital distance (AGD) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). The study included women diagnosed with PCOS and a control group who attended the Clinical University Hospital 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' in Murcia (Spain). Serum concentrations of AMH were measured and two AGD measurements were obtained: (i) from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC); and (ii) from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF). Data were assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Women with PCOS (n = 126) had significantly larger AGDAC (80.5 ± 11.3 versus 76.0 ± 10.4 mm; p < 0.001) and higher AMH (7.2 ± 4.7 versus 3.1 ± 2.2; p < 0.001) compared to control women (n = 159). Women with serum AMH above 3.8 ng/mL (clinical cut-off used in PCOS) were 9.1 times more likely to have PCOS (95% CI: 5.1-16.2). The area under the ROC curve of combined model of AMH and AGDAC was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83-0.91). The combined model for predicting PCOS based on AMH and AGDAC has better diagnostic accuracy than that of AMH or AGDAC alone. This model could be useful for clinicians and improve diagnosis and clinical management of these women.

Assessment of Optimism in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Case Control-Study.

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a chronic endocrinopathy characterized by hyperandrogenism and anovulation that may pervade psychological dimensions such as dispositional optimism. Considering how PCOS influences mental health and the lack of studies on this matter, this research was aimed at assessing optimism and associated factors in PCOS. A case-control study of 156 patients with PCOS and 117 controls was conducted. All woman filled out the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R), a self-report questionnaire for measuring dispositional optimism. Medication, pain severity, gynecological, and sociodemographic information was also collected. Lower optimism was found in patients with PCOS compared to controls, even after covariate adjustment (LOT-R global scores: 14.1 vs. 15.9, p = 0.020). Our study provides evidence that a personality characteristic with important implications in illness prognosis may be affected in PCOS. We propose to assess dispositional optimism with the LOT-R scale in the gynecological appointment and tailor medical attention accordingly as a way to improve the comprehensive care of these patients within a multidisciplinary team.

Are there differences in basal thrombophilias and C-reactive protein between women with or without PCOS?

RESEARCH QUESTION: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women have increased cardiovascular risks, although it is unclear whether the haemostatic system and coagulation contribute to that increased risk. DESIGN: Women attending the Gynecology Unit of the 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Hospital (Murcia, Spain) for routine gynaecological examinations between September 2014 and May 2016 were assessed for PCOS using the Rotterdam criteria (hyperandrogenism [H], oligo/amenorrhoea [O] and polycystic ovarian morphology [POM]) and were classified into four phenotypic. In total, 126 cases were identified and 159 control women were selected. All women underwent physical and gynaecological examinations, and blood tests between the second and fifth day of the menstrual cycle. Differences in hormonal, basal thrombophilia and metabolic parameters, and C-reactive protein (CRP) between PCOS and controls were analysed. RESULTS: After adjusting by BMI and age, PCOS women had higher LH (P < 0.001), testosterone (P < 0.001), free testosterone (P = 0.01) and anti-Müllerian hormone (P < 0.001) and lower FSH (P = 0.03) compared with controls, whereas sex hormone-binding globulin was no different. Cases showed significantly higher protein S, glucose, insulin and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) compared with controls (P < 0.05). There were no differences in protein C levels, antithrombin III, prothrombin time, homocysteine, D-dimer, factor V Leyden, prothrombin G20210A polymorphism or CRP. The H+O phenotype showed the poorest results for insulin and HOMA-IR (P = 0.04 and 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there are no differences in the basal thrombophilias between women with and without PCOS. However, PCOS with H+O shows the poorest metabolic profile.

Accuracy of anogenital distance and anti-Müllerian hormone in the diagnosis of endometriosis without surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive ability of a combination of anogenital distance (AGD) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) to diagnosis the presence of endometriosis without surgery. METHODS: The present study included women diagnosed with endometriosis and a control group who attended the "Virgen de la Arrixaca" University Hospital, Murcia, Spain, between September 1, 2014, and May 31, 2015. Serum concentrations of AMH were measured, and two AGD measurements were obtained: from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC ), and from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF ). Data were assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Women in the endometriosis group (n=57) had significantly shorter AGDAF (22.8 ± 4.6 vs 27.2 ± 5.7 mm; P<0.001) and lower AMH (2.2 ± 2.5 vs 3.3 ± 1.9 ng/mL; P<0.003) compared with the control group (n=93). Women with serum AMH below the clinical cut-off (1 ng/mL) were 17.40-times more likely to have endometriosis (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.64-53.82). The area under the ROC curve of combined AMH and AGDAF was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85). CONCLUSION: The model for predicting endometriosis on the basis of AMH and AGD could be useful for clinicians and epidemiologists to improve diagnosis and prognosis of this condition.

Assessment of anogenital distance as a diagnostic tool in polycystic ovary syndrome.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is anogenital distance (AGD) a useful clinical tool for predicting polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) and its main National Institutes of Health (NIH) phenotypes? DESIGN: Case-control study conducted between September 2014 and May 2016 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Clinical Hospital 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' in the Murcia region (south-eastern Spain). One hundred and twenty-six cases of PCOS and 159 controls without PCOS were included. AGD measurements were taken from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC), and from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF). Parametric and non-parametric tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess associations between AGD and the presence of PCOS and its phenotypes. RESULTS: AGDAC, but not AGDAF, was associated with PCOS and all its phenotypes (P-values < 0.001 to 0.048). The highest area under the curve (0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.71) was obtained for all PCOS with AGDAC with a sensitivity and specificity of 50.0% and 73.0%, and positive and negative predictive value of 59.0% and 64.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AGDAC could moderately discriminate the presence of PCOS and may be a useful clinical tool.

Presence of polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with longer anogenital distance in adult Mediterranean women.

STUDY QUESTION: Is polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) associated with anogenital distance (AGD), a biomarker of fetal androgen exposure, in adult Mediterranean women? SUMMARY ANSWER: Longer AGD is associated with PCOS in adult Mediterranean women. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: AGD is a biomarker of prenatal androgen milieu. Human observational studies have reported that associations between AGD and reproductive parameters in both sexes. Exposure of the female fetus to intrauterine androgens may be a risk factor for PCOS in adulthood. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a case-control study of 126 women with PCOS and 159 controls between September 2014 and May 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Cases were attending the gynecology unit of the 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' University Clinical Hospital (Murcia, Spain), and were diagnosed following the Rotterdam criteria. Phenotypic subtypes of PCOS were also assessed. Both prevalent and incident (newly diagnosed) cases were included. Controls were women without PCOS attending the gynecological outpatient clinic for routine gynecological exams. All women completed health questionnaires, and underwent physical and gynecological examinations, including transvaginal ultrasound and blood draw. We obtained measures from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC), and from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF). Gynecologists performing the AGD measures were blind to the status of the patients. We used unconditional multiple logistic regression to evaluate the association between AGD measurements and PCOS while accounting for relevant covariates and confounders, such as BMI, age and episiotomy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Cases showed significantly longer AGDAF and AGDAC compared to controls in bivariate analyses (P-values < 0.05). In the final adjusted models, AGDAC, but not AGDAF, was associated with the presence of PCOS (P-values = 0.002-0.008). Women with AGDAC in the upper compared to the lowest tertile were 2.9-times (95% CI 1.4-5.9; P-trend = 0.008) more likely to have PCOS. AGDAC measures were also significantly associated with all of the different phenotypic subtypes of PCOS (ORs = 3.1-5.1; P-values < 0.05). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: We took into account known and suspected covariates and confounders, but the possibility of chance findings or residual confounding should be noted. As with all observational studies, causal inference is limited, and study selection and information bias should not be ruled out. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results support the hypothesis that PCOS has an intrauterine origin, and that the hormonal environment in which the fetus develops may be highly relevant. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: This work was supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) (AES, Acción Estratégica en Salud), grant No. PI13/01237, and The Seneca Foundation, Murcia Regional Agency of Science and Technology, grant No. 19443/PI/14. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Investigation of anogenital distance as a diagnostic tool in endometriosis.

An association between anogenital distance (AGD) and endometriosis has been reported, suggesting that AGD may be a useful clinical tool in endometriosis. The predictive ability of AGD of women in discriminating presence and type of endometriosis was examined. A case-control study was conducted at the University Hospital 'Virgen de la Arrixaca', Murcia, Spain, between 2014 and 2015. A total of 114 participants diagnosed with endometriosis using ultrasound findings and 105 controls were recruited. Two AGD measurements were obtained: one from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC), and another one from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF). Parametric and non-parametric tests andreceiver operator characterstic analyses were used to determine relationships between AGD and presence of endometriosis and subgroups (ovarian endometriomas or deep infiltrating endometriosis [DIE]). The AGDAF, but not AGDAC, was associated with presence of endometriomas, DIE (P-values, <0.001-0.02), or both. The highest area under curve (0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97) was obtained for the DIE subgroup with the AGDAF measurement, with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.4% and 91.4%, respectively. AGDAF can therefore efficiently discriminate the presence of DIE and may be a useful clinical tool.

Endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis in adulthood are strongly associated with anogenital distance, a biomarker for prenatal hormonal environment.

STUDY QUESTION: Is the length of the anogenital distance (AGD), a biomarker of the in-utero prenatal hormonal environment, associated with the presence of endometriomas and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Shorter AGD is associated with presence of endometriomas and DIE. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: It is debated whether hormonal exposure to estrogens in utero may be a risk factor for endometriosis in adulthood. AGD is a biomarker of prenatal hormonal environment and observational studies have shown an association between AGD and reproductive parameters in both sexes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This case-control study of 114 women with endometriosis (endometriomas and/or DIE) and 105 controls was conducted between September 2014 and May 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Cases were attending the Endometriosis Unit of the Hospital. Prevalent as well as incident cases, diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), were included. Controls were women without endometriosis attending the gynecological outpatient clinic for routine gynecological exams. Participants completed health questionnaires, followed physical and gynecological examinations, including TVUS. Measurements from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC), and from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF) were obtained in all subjects. Unconditional multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the association between AGD measurements and presence of endometriomas and/or DIE while accounting for important confounders and covariates, including age, body mass index, vaginal delivery or episiotomy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: AGDAF was related to presence of endometriomas and/or DIE. For all cases of endometriosis (endometriomas and DIE), women in the lowest tertile of the AGDAF distribution, compared with the upper tertile, were 7.6-times (95% CI 2.8-21.0; P-trend < 0.001) more likely to have endometriosis. With regard to DIE, women with AGDAF below the median, compared with those with AGDAF above the median, were 41.6-times (95% CI 3.9-438; P-value = 0.002) more likely to have endometriosis. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: In case-control studies, information and selection bias has to be ruled out. Physicians conducting the measurement were blind to the status of the patients. Controls came from the same population as the cases. We adjusted for known and suspected confounders and covariates, but the possibility of residual confounding or chance findings should always be considered. As with all observational studies, causal inference is limited. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study suggests that endometriosis, especially the DIE, might have a prenatal origin that may be traced back to the hormonal milieu in which the fetus develops. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: This work was supported by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, ISCIII (AES), grant no. PI13/01237 and the Seneca Foundation, Murcia Regional Agency of Science and Technology, grant no. 19443/PI/14. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.