Dual mTOR1/2 Inhibitor Sapanisertib (FTH-003/TAK-228) in Combination With Weekly Paclitaxel in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Phase II Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently altered at genomic level in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Since mTOR is the last protein in the PI3K signaling cascade, it may have the largest impact on the pathway and has been a focus of targeted therapies. Sapanisertib (FTH-003/TAK-228) is an oral highly selective mTOR1 and mTOR2 inhibitor. NFE2L2 mutations have been described as predictive biomarkers of response in patients with advanced squamous cell lung cancer treated with sapanisertib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, investigator-initiated phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of sapanisertib plus paclitaxel in patients with mUC who had progressed to prior platinum therapy, and the correlation with NFE2L2 mutations in responders. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients were treated with weekly paclitaxel at dose of 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with sapanisertib 4 mg administered orally 3 days per week on days 2-4, 9-11, 16-18, and 23-25 of a 28-day cycle. NFE2L2 mutations were analyzed by Sanger sequencing in responders. RESULTS: 22 patients were enrolled from May 2018 to April 2020; the trial was halted early due to slow accrual and the COVID-19 pandemic. ORR was 18.2% (n = 4). Disease control rate was 50% (7 SD and 4 PR). Median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI: 1.8-6.1) and median OS was 6.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-13.4). Adverse events (AE) of grade 3-4 were seen in 86% of patients, but no patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. NFE2L2 mutations were not found in responders. CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary endpoint was no met, sapanisertib and paclitaxel combination demonstrated clinical activity in a heavily pretreated population of mUC. This trial generates insight for future combination of sapaniserib with immunotherapy and/or antibody drug conjugates.

mTOR Inhibition and T-DM1 in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

In patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer, the combination of everolimus (mTORC1 inhibitor) with trastuzumab failed to show a clinically significant benefit. However, the combination of mTOR inhibition and the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) remains unexplored. We tested T-DM1 plus everolimus in a broad panel of HER2-positive breast cancer cell lines. The combination was superior to T-DM1 alone in four cell lines (HCC1954, SKBR3, EFM192A, and MDA-MB-36) and in two cultures from primary tumor cells derived from HER2-positive patient-derived xenografts (PDX), but not in BT474 cells. In the trastuzumab-resistant HCC1954 cell line, we characterized the effects of the combination using TAK-228 (mTORC1 and -2 inhibitor) and knockdown of the different mTOR complex components. T-DM1 did not affect mTOR downstream signaling nor induct autophagy. Importantly, mTOR inhibition increased intracellular T-DM1 levels, leading to increased lysosomal accumulation of the compound. The increased efficacy of mTOR inhibition plus T-DM1 was abrogated by lysosome inhibitors (chloroquine and bafilomycin A1). Our experiments suggest that BT474 are less sensitive to T-DM1 due to lack of optimal lysosomal processing and intrinsic resistance to the DM1 moiety. Finally, we performed several in vivo experiments that corroborated the superior activity of T-DM1 and everolimus in HCC1954 and PDX-derived mouse models. In summary, everolimus in combination with T-DM1 showed strong antitumor effects in HER2-positive breast cancer, both in vitro and in vivo. This effect might be related, at least partially, to mTOR-dependent lysosomal processing of T-DM1, a finding that might apply to other ADCs that require lysosomal processing. IMPLICATIONS: Inhibition of mTOR increases the antitumor activity of T-DM1, supporting that the combination of mTOR inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates warrants clinical evaluation in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

LCOR mediates interferon-independent tumor immunogenicity and responsiveness to immune-checkpoint blockade in triple-negative breast cancer.

Ligand-dependent corepressor (LCOR) mediates normal and malignant breast stem cell differentiation. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) generate phenotypic heterogeneity and drive therapy resistance, yet their role in immunotherapy is poorly understood. Here we show that immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy selects for LCORlow CSCs with reduced antigen processing/presentation machinery (APM) driving immune escape and ICB resistance in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We unveil an unexpected function of LCOR as a master transcriptional activator of APM genes binding to IFN-stimulated response elements (ISREs) in an IFN signaling-independent manner. Through genetic modification of LCOR expression, we demonstrate its central role in modulation of tumor immunogenicity and ICB responsiveness. In TNBC, LCOR associates with ICB clinical response. Importantly, extracellular vesicle (EV) Lcor-messenger RNA therapy in combination with anti-PD-L1 overcame resistance and eradicated breast cancer metastasis in preclinical models. Collectively, these data support LCOR as a promising target for enhancement of ICB efficacy in TNBC, by boosting of tumor APM independently of IFN.

Novel Oral mTORC1/2 Inhibitor TAK-228 Has Synergistic Antitumor Effects When Combined with Paclitaxel or PI3Kα Inhibitor TAK-117 in Preclinical Bladder Cancer Models.

Advanced bladder cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently activated in this disease and can be a potential therapeutic target for treatment intervention. We studied the antitumor efficacy of a new targeted therapy, TAK-228 (oral mTORC1/2 inhibitor), in preclinical models of bladder cancer. We evaluated the effects of TAK-228 in combination with a PI3Kα inhibitor (TAK-117) or with chemotherapy (paclitaxel). We used six bladder cancer cell lines and in vivo xenografts models. TAK-228 strongly inhibited cell proliferation in vitro, and reduced tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo. Three possible biomarkers of response to TAK-228 (basal levels of 4E-BP1, p-4E-BP1/4E-BP1 ratio, or eIF4E/4E-BP1 ratio) were identified. The combination of TAK-228 and TAK-117 had synergistic effects in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, TAK-228 demonstrated greater efficiency when combined with paclitaxel. TAK-228 also showed ex vivo activity in tumor tissue from patients with treatment-naïve bladder cancer. TAK-228 is a promising investigational agent that induces a strong effect on cell proliferation, tumor growth, and angiogenesis in bladder cancer models. High synergistic effects were observed with TAK-228 combined with a PI3K inhibitor or with chemotherapy. These results are currently being investigated in a clinic trial of TAK-228 plus paclitaxel in patients with metastatic bladder cancer (NCT03745911). IMPLICATIONS: Strong synergistic effects were observed when combining TAK-228 with TAK-117 (a PI3Kα inhibitor) or with paclitaxel chemotherapy. A phase II study at our institution is currently evaluating the efficacy of TAK-228 combined with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic bladder cancer.