Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Digestion ; 105(3): 224-231, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479373

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive and standardized colonoscopy reports are crucial in colorectal cancer prevention, monitoring, and research. This study investigates adherence to national and international guidelines by analyzing reporting practices among 21 endoscopists in 7 German centers, with a focus on polyp reporting. METHODS: We identified and assessed German, European, American, and World Health Organization-provided statements to identify key elements in colonoscopy reporting. Board-certified gastroenterologists rated the relevance of each element and estimated their reporting frequency. Adherence to the identified report elements was evaluated for 874 polyps from 351 colonoscopy reports ranging from March 2021 to March 2022. RESULTS: We identified numerous recommendations for colonoscopy reporting. We categorized the reasoning behind those recommendations into clinical relevance, justification, and quality control and research. Although all elements were considered relevant by the surveyed gastroenterologists, discrepancies were observed in the evaluated reports. Particularly diminutive polyps or attributes which are rarely abnormal (e.g., surface integrity) respectively rarely performed (e.g., injection) were sparsely documented. Furthermore, the white light morphology of polyps was inconsistently documented using either the Paris classification or free text. In summary, the analysis of 874 reported polyps revealed heterogeneous adherence to the recommendations, with reporting frequencies ranging from 3% to 89%. CONCLUSION: The inhomogeneous report practices may result from implicit reporting practices and recommendations with varying clinical relevance. Future recommendations should clearly differentiate between clinical relevance and research and quality control or explanatory purposes. Additionally, the role of computer-assisted documentation should be further evaluated to increase report frequencies of non-pathological findings and diminutive polyps.


Assuntos
Pólipos do Colo , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Colonoscopia/normas , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colonoscopia/métodos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Pólipos do Colo/patologia , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico , Alemanha , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade , Gastroenterologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenterologistas/normas , Documentação/normas , Documentação/estatística & dados numéricos , Documentação/métodos
2.
Int J Equity Health ; 22(1): 240, 2023 Nov 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37978389

RESUMO

Social participation, also termed stakeholder voice, is an important component of health system governance. Increased interactions between the community and policy makers could facilitate a more responsive health system that targets the needs of the community better. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a handbook on social participation that identified five key themes for ministries of health to consider when engaging the input of the community. In this rapid systematic literature review, we aimed to identify quantitative and qualitative measures that have been used to assess aspects of social participation involving people and policy makers. We identified 172 measures from 48 studies from countries in all six WHO regions. These measures were categorized by all five themes from the handbook on social participation and these measures are linked to 27 concepts. This rapid review found that the focus of measures is largely on the existence of participation-be it by the general population or specific vulnerable groups-rather than on the quality of their participation. The measures in this inventory may be useful for ministries of health and other key stakeholders to use when developing methods to assess and encourage social participation in their context.


Assuntos
Programas Governamentais , Participação Social , Humanos , Políticas , Pessoal Administrativo
3.
Endoscopy ; 55(12): 1118-1123, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37399844

RESUMO

BACKGROUND : Reliable documentation is essential for maintaining quality standards in endoscopy; however, in clinical practice, report quality varies. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based prototype for the measurement of withdrawal and intervention times, and automatic photodocumentation. METHOD: A multiclass deep learning algorithm distinguishing different endoscopic image content was trained with 10 557 images (1300 examinations, nine centers, four processors). Consecutively, the algorithm was used to calculate withdrawal time (AI prediction) and extract relevant images. Validation was performed on 100 colonoscopy videos (five centers). The reported and AI-predicted withdrawal times were compared with video-based measurement; photodocumentation was compared for documented polypectomies. RESULTS: Video-based measurement in 100 colonoscopies revealed a median absolute difference of 2.0 minutes between the measured and reported withdrawal times, compared with 0.4 minutes for AI predictions. The original photodocumentation represented the cecum in 88 examinations compared with 98/100 examinations for the AI-generated documentation. For 39/104 polypectomies, the examiners' photographs included the instrument, compared with 68 for the AI images. Lastly, we demonstrated real-time capability (10 colonoscopies). CONCLUSION : Our AI system calculates withdrawal time, provides an image report, and is real-time ready. After further validation, the system may improve standardized reporting, while decreasing the workload created by routine documentation.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Colonoscopia , Algoritmos , Documentação
7.
Health systems and policy analysis; 49
Monografia em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-364198

RESUMO

This policy brief is one of a new series to meet the needs of policy-makers and health system managers. The aim is to develop key messages to support evidence-informed policy-making and the editors will continue to strengthen the series by working with authors to improve the consideration given to policy options and implementation.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Atenção à Saúde , Conhecimento , Aprendizagem
8.
Artigo em Inglês | WHO IRIS | ID: who-344952

RESUMO

Civil society and community groups are active players in the COVID-19 response, providing support, advice and information where government reach is poor. Yet most governments have not managed to bring civil society’s perspectives, insights, and experiences into the COVID-19 response in a systematic way. If the world is to ‘build forward better’, more regular and systematised government-civil society engagement will need to underpin a shifttowards more inclusive health governance. Doing so successfully will require heavy investments in capacity-building for government actors to value and feel comfortable managing and sustaining participatory spaces and in skills to bring forward the kind of governance needed to build resilience against the next pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Saúde Global
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...