RESUMO
PURPOSE: This US FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study evaluated the extended use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in catheter-dependent men with urinary retention who were not deemed candidates for corrective surgery but demonstrated bladder contractility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Spanner was placed for 3 cycles of 30 days in catheter-dependent men with comorbid conditions, confirmed detrusor contractility, and catheter-associated discomfort. At each visit, postvoid residual, maximum flow rate, international prostate symptom score, quality of life, and adverse events were assessed. Voiding success was defined as PVR ≤ 150 ml at all visits. RESULTS: One hundred seven men were enrolled at 8 US sites; 82/107 (76.6%) completed the trial, and 79/107 (73.8%) successfully maintained PVR ≤ 150 ml for the trial duration. Patients were 77.1 ± 10.6 years old; 63/107 (58.9%) were dependent on Foley and 40/107 (37.4%) on intermittent catheterization for 36.0 ± 39.3 days and 30.2 ± 45.8 days, respectively. 25/107 (23.4%) discontinuations were primarily due to voluntary patient withdrawal 9/107 (8.4%), investigator-initiated withdrawal 8/107 (7.5%), or lack of effectiveness 4/107 (3.7%). During Spanner use, the mean Q max was 11.2 ± 6.6, mean IPSS was 7.5 ± 6.4, and mean QOL was 2.0 ± 1.6. The most prevalent device-related adverse events were asymptomatic bacteriuria 25/107 (23.4%), discomfort 10/107 (9.4%), and urinary urgency 8/107 (7.5%). No device-related serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that catheter-dependent men with sufficient bladder contractility can achieve volitional voiding and successful bladder drainage using The Spanner Temporary Prostatic Stent for extended periods of time.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of levofloxacin with that of ciprofloxacin for the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. METHODS: In a multicenter, double-blind, active-control trial, 377 men with a history of chronic bacterial prostatitis, current clinical signs and symptoms, and laboratory evidence of prostatitis were randomized to treatment with levofloxacin 500 mg once daily or ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily for 28 days. The primary endpoint was microbiologic efficacy in the microbiologically assessable population. The Meares-Stamey "four-glass" procedure was used to obtain prostatic secretions and urine for culture. RESULTS: A total of 377 subjects received the study drug. The clinical success rates, including cured plus improved patients, were similar (75% for levofloxacin and 72.8% for ciprofloxacin; 95% confidence interval for the difference in the success rates: -13.27 to 8.87), as were the microbiologic eradication rates (75% for levofloxacin and 76.8% for ciprofloxacin; 95% confidence interval for the difference -8.98 to 12.58). Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli were the most common isolates. The 6-month relapse rates were similar for both regimens. Both levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 28 days is as effective as ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily for 28 days for the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis. Isolation of a high proportion of gram-positive organisms, as well as gram-negative pathogens, underscores the necessity of choosing an antimicrobial agent with broad-spectrum activity.
