Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 41(6): 581-9, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25776067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Empiric triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori should be abandoned when clarithromycin resistance rate is >15-20%. Optimisation of triple therapy (high-dose acid suppression and 14-day duration) can increase eradication rates by 10%. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of optimised triple (OPT-TRI) and nonbismuth quadruple concomitant (OPT-CON) therapies. METHODS: Prospective multicentre study in 16 Spanish centres using triple therapy in clinical practice. In a 3-month two-phase fashion, the first 402 patients received an OPT-TRI therapy [esomeprazole (40 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.d) and clarithromycin (500 mg b.d) for 14 days] and the last 375 patients an OPT-CON treatment [OPT-TRI therapy plus metronidazole (500 mg b.d)]. RESULTS: Seven-hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients were included (402 OPT-TRI, 375 OPT-CON). The OPT-CON therapy achieved significantly higher eradication rates in the per-protocol [82.3% (95% CI = 78-86%) vs. 93.8% (91-96%), P < 0.001] and intention-to-treat analysis [81.3% (78-86%) vs. 90.4% (87-93%), P < 0.001]. Adverse events (97% mild/moderate) were significantly more common with OPT-CON therapy (39% vs. 47%, P = 0.016), but full compliance with therapy was similar between groups (94% vs. 92%, P = 0.4). OPT-CON therapy was the only significant predictor of successful eradication (odds ratio, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.48-3.51, P < 0.001). The rate of participating centres achieving cure rates ≥ 90% favoured OPT-CON therapy (OPT-TRI 25% vs. OPT-CON 62%). CONCLUSIONS: Empiric OPT-CON therapy achieved significantly higher cure rates (>90%) compared to OPT-TRI therapy. Addition of metronidazole to OPT-TRI therapy increased eradication rates by 10%, resulting in more mild adverse effects, but without impairing compliance with therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Adesão à Medicação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amoxicilina/administração & dosagem , Amoxicilina/efeitos adversos , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Claritromicina/administração & dosagem , Claritromicina/efeitos adversos , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Esomeprazol/administração & dosagem , Esomeprazol/efeitos adversos , Esomeprazol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Metronidazol/efeitos adversos , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
5.
Transplant Proc ; 43(3): 714-7, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21486581

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are new immunosuppressive drugs for organ transplantation. They are interesting for liver transplantation because of their absence of nephrotoxicity and potential antitumor effects, because calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are associated with renal dysfunction post-CNI and tumors. We sought to analyze the indications, safety, and efficacy of mTOR among liver transplant patients at our center. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who were treated with mTOR for their indications for liver transplantation, type of immunosuppressive therapy, acute rejection episodes, and evolution of kidney function. RESULTS: We identified 43 (19.02%) patients treated with mTOR including 35 (81.4%) males and 8 (18.6%) females of overall average age of 56.7 (range, 44-68). In 30% of patients, the drug was introduced for kidney failure, and in 23% for actual or a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. The average time to introduction of the mTOR was 6.4 months (range, 1-46). The final immunosuppressive regimen was mTOR alone (73%), or mTOR plus CNI (23%), or mTOR plus mycophenolate mofetil (4%). The average values of creatinine and urea were lower after conversion to mTOR (P < .05) with a 6.9% incidence of acute rejection episodes. CONCLUSION: The mTOR immunosuppressive drugs are safe for liver transplant patients, effectively controlling renal dysfunction. They can be used in other indications, such as neurotoxicity, de novo tumors, and high risk of HCC recurrence. More studies are needed to clarify their long-term effectiveness.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Fígado , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/antagonistas & inibidores , Adulto , Idoso , Nitrogênio da Ureia Sanguínea , Creatinina/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
Transplant Proc ; 42(8): 2966-9, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20970584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biliary complications, a major source of morbidity after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), are increasingly being treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopic management has been shown to be superior to percutaneous therapy and surgery. Covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMSs) may be an alternative to the current endoscopic standard treatment with periodic plastic stent replacement. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of temporary CSEMS insertion for biliary complications after OLT. METHODS: From November 2001 to December 2009, the 242 OLT performed in 226 patients included 67 cases that developed post-OLT leaks or strictures (29.6%), excluding ischemic biliary complications. CSEMSs were used in 22 patients (33%), 18 male and 4 female, with an overall median age of 55 years (range, 29-69). In-house OLT patients underwent an index ERCP at 26 days (range, 8-784) after OLT. Their records were reviewed to determine ERCP findings, technical success, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: ERCP with sphincterotomy was performed in all 22 patients, revealing 18 with biliary strictures alone (82%), 3 with strictures and leaks (14%), and 1 with strictures and choledocholithiasis (4%). All strictures were anastomotic. All patients had 1-2 plastic stents inserted across the anastomosis (11 had prior balloon dilation); stones were successfully removed, for an initial technical success rate of 100% (22/22). CSEMSs, were placed at the second ERCP in 14 patients, at the third in 7, and at the fourth in 1. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 3-25) after CSEMS removal, 21/22 patients (95.5%) remain stricture free and one relapsed, requiring repeat CSEMS insertion. Four patients experienced pain after CSEMS insertion. At CSEMS removal, migration was noted in 5 cases, into either the distal duodenum (n=4) or the proximal biliary tree (n=1), and embedding was seen in 1 case. There were no serious complications; no patients needed hepatojejunostomy. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is a safe first-line approach for post-OLT biliary complications. It was highly successful in a population with anastomotic leaks and strictures. The therapeutic role of ERCP to manage biliary complications after OLT in the long term is not well known. In our experience, the high rate (close to 95%) of efficacy and its relative safety allowed us to use CSEMS to manage refractory biliary post-OLT strictures. CSEMS insertion may preclude most post-OLT hepatojejunostomies.


Assuntos
Doenças Biliares/etiologia , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Metais , Stents , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...