Bayesian estimation of hepatitis E virus seroprevalence for populations with different exposure levels to swine in The Netherlands.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is ubiquitous in pigs worldwide and may be zoonotic. Previous HEV seroprevalence estimates for groups of people working with swine were higher than for control groups. However, discordance among results of anti-HEV assays means that true seroprevalence estimates, i.e. seroprevalence due to previous exposure to HEV, depends on choice of seroassay. We tested blood samples from three subpopulations (49 swine veterinarians, 153 non-swine veterinarians and 644 randomly selected individuals from the general population) with one IgM and two IgG ELISAs, and subsets with IgG and/or IgM Western blots. A Bayesian stochastical model was used to combine results of all assays. The model accounted for imperfection of each assay by estimating sensitivity and specificity, and accounted for dependence between serological assays. As expected, discordance among assay results occurred. Applying the model yielded seroprevalence estimates of approximately 11% for swine veterinarians,approximately 6% for non-swine veterinarians and approximately 2% for the general population. By combining the results of five serological assays in a Bayesian stochastical model we confirmed that exposure to swine or their environment was associated with elevated HEV seroprevalence.

Hepatitis E is a cause of unexplained hepatitis in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the major etiologic agent of enterically transmitted viral hepatitis in much of the developing world. Evidence provided in recent years shows that HEV is also prevalent in very low numbers in non-endemic countries. Recently, a cluster of three patients with acute hepatitis E but no history of travel to endemic countries was discovered in the geographical area provided with service by the Public Health Laboratory Groningen and Drenthe, The Netherlands. OBJECTIVE: This lead to the question whether hepatitis E is a cause of unexplained hepatitis in this district. STUDY DESIGN: The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG and IgM among 209 patients with clinical signs of hepatitis, negative test for hepatitis A-C, no history of foreign travel and no other cause of hepatocellular damage was compared with a matched control group of 209 individuals. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in seroprevalence between the two groups for IgG anti-HEV as determined with the Abbot HEV EIA (6.2% versus 0.5%); however this difference could not be confirmed with the Genelabs Diagnostics HEV IgG ELISA (6.7% versus 3.8%). For confirmed cases of IgM anti-HEV we also detected a significant difference between the two groups (3.3% versus 0.5%). Remarkably, the combination of IgG and IgM anti-HEV was only found among hepatitis patients. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of locally acquired hepatitis E in The Netherlands. Therefore, in cases of unexplained acute hepatitis, the diagnosis of hepatitis E should be considered even in the absence of foreign travel.

Efficacy of donor vaccination before hematopoietic cell transplantation and recipient vaccination both before and early after transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is followed by humoral immunodeficiency. We evaluated whether antibody levels can be improved by recipient vaccination on day -1 and 50 and whether the levels can be further improved by donor vaccination on day -20. A total of 85 patients were randomized or assigned to one of the following strategies of immunization with Streptococcus pneumoniae polysaccharides, Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide-protein conjugate, tetanus toxoid (protein recall antigen) and hepatitis B surface antigen (protein neo-antigen): (1) donor on day -20, recipient on days -1, +50 and +365 (D(-20)R(-1,50,365)); (2) donor nil, recipient on days -1, +50 and +365 (D(N)R(-1,50,365)); or (3) donor nil, recipient on day +365 (D(N)R(365)). For H. influenzae and tetanus, IgG levels after grafting were the highest in the D(-20)R(-1,50,365) patients, intermediate in the D(N)R(-1,50,365) patients and the lowest in the D(N)R(365) patients. For S. pneumoniae and hepatitis B, antibody levels appeared to be similar in all three patient groups. The results suggest that for polysaccharide-protein conjugate antigens or protein recall antigens, recipient immunization on days -1 and 50 improves antibody levels and that donor vaccination on day -20 further improves the levels. In contrast, neither recipient immunization on days -1 and 50 nor donor immunization on day -20 appears to be efficacious for polysaccharide antigens and poorly immunogenic protein neo-antigens.