Which femoral neck for a dual mobility cup? A biomechanical evaluation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate polyethylene (PE) damage and wear lesions to the chamfer of mobile components under mobile and fixed femoral neck impingement at the third articulation, and to determine which femoral neck characteristics should be considered with a dual mobility cup to limit those lesions. METHODS: Two femoral neck geometries (cylindrical and quadrangular) with two surface finishing roughness (rough and polished), and two head-to-neck ratios (28- and 22.2-mm diameter femoral heads) were evaluated in a hip simulator testing. For each characteristic, six femoral necks were tested with six dual mobility cups under fixed and mobile femoral neck impingement conditions. Chamfer PE damage and volumetric wear were evaluated and compared for each femoral neck characteristic and impingement condition. RESULTS: Under mobile impingement condition, femoral neck characteristics did not significantly affect PE damage and wear lesions to the chamfer (p = 0.283 to 0.810). However, under fixed impingement condition, significantly higher PE damage and wear lesions to the chamfer were produced by the quadrangular geometry compared to the cylindrical geometry (p = 0.004 to 0.025). In addition, with the quadrangular geometry, rough surface finishing was demonstrated to increase volumetric wear of the chamfer (p = 0.009). No significant influence of head-to-neck ratio was observed on PE damage and wear lesions to the chamfer (p = 0.244 to 0.714). DISCUSSION: This biomechanical study emphasized that femoral neck characteristics are critical with dual mobility cup and tend to favor a cylindrical geometry particularly whether fixed impingement at the third articulation occurs.

Friction in modern total hip arthroplasty bearings: Effect of material, design, and test methodology.

The purpose of this study was to characterize the effect of a group of variables on frictional torque generated by acetabular components as well as to understand the influence of test model. Three separate test models, which had been previously used in the literature, were used to understand the effect of polyethylene material, bearing design, head size, and material combinations. Each test model differed by the way it simulated rotation of the head, the type of frictional torque value it reported (static vs. dynamic), and the type of motion simulated (oscillating motion vs. continuous motion). It was determined that not only test model may impact product ranking of fictional torque generated but also static frictional torque may be significantly larger than a dynamic frictional torque. In addition to test model differences, it was discovered that the frictional torque values for conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylenes were not statistically significantly different in the more physiologically relevant test models. With respect to bearing design, the frictional torque values for mobile bearing designs were similar to the 28-mm diameter inner bearing rather than the large diameter outer liner. Testing with a more physiologically relevant rotation showed that frictional torque increased with bearing diameter for the metal on polyethylene and ceramic on polyethylene bearings but remained constant for ceramic on ceramic bearings. Finally, ceramic on ceramic bearings produced smaller frictional torque values when compared to metal on polyethylene and ceramic on polyethylene groups.

Dual mobility bearings withstand loading from steeper cup-inclinations without substantial wear.

Steep cup abduction angles with adverse joint loading may increase traditional polyethylene bearing wear in total hip arthroplasties. However, there have been few reports evaluating the effect of cup inclination on the wear of dual-mobility devices. In a hip joint simulation, we compared the short-term wear of two-sizes of modular highly cross-linked dual-mobility bearings (28 mm femoral head diameter/42 mm polyethylene insert outer diameter/54 mm acetabular shell diameter; 22.2 mm femoral head diameter/36 mm polyethylene insert outer diameter/48 mm acetabular shell diameter) at 50 and 65° of cup inclination with modular 28 mm femoral head on 54 mm cup diameter metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings. Increasing inclination from 50-65° had no changes in volumetric wear of 28/42/54 mm (mean, 1.7 vs. 1.2 mm3 /million cycles, respectively; p = 0.50) and 22.2/36/48 mm (mean, 1.7 vs. 1.2 mm3/million cycles, respectively; p = 0.48) dual mobility bearings. At 65°, 22.2/36/48 mm dual-mobility bearings had lower volumetric loss (mean, 2.2 vs. 6.3 mm(3) ; p = 0.03) and wear rates (mean, 1.2 vs. 2.7 mm3/million cycles; p = 0.02) compared to metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings. Modern-generation dual-mobility designs with highly cross-linked polyethylenes may potentially withstand edge-loading from steeper cup-inclinations without substantial decreases in wear.

Short-term wear evaluation of thin acetabular liners on 36-mm femoral heads.

BACKGROUND: Dislocation remains the leading cause of revision THA. One approach to decreasing prosthetic dislocation risk has been the use of larger femoral head component sizes. The upper limit of head size in metal-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty has historically been limited because of concerns about increased wear on thin polyethylene components. It is not known to what degree this concern should apply to more wear-resistant polyethylene components. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined (1) in vitro wear rates of polyethylene liners of varying thicknesses, (2) whether there were differences in the microscopic wear characteristics as a function of polyethylene thickness, and (3) whether thin polyethylene components resulted in early catastrophic failures. METHODS: We used a hip wear simulator to compare the wear performance of 12 highly crosslinked polyethylene acetabular inserts. The internal diameter of all components was 36 mm, and there were three samples tested of each thickness (1.9, 3.9, 5.9, or 7.9 mm). Testing was conducted for 2.4 million cycles. Gravimetric mass loss was converted to volumetric loss, which was subsequently converted to theoretical linear penetration rates. RESULTS: Wear rates decreased with increasing polyethylene thickness. Mean ± SD wear rates for the 1.9-, 3.9-, 5.9-, and 7.9-mm groups were 5.0 ± 0.5, 3.2 ± 0.3, 2.5 ± 1.1, and 2.2 ± 1.3 mm(3)/million cycles, respectively (p < 0.016). Calculated penetration rates were 0.015, 0.012, 0.011, and 0.010 mm/million cycles, respectively (p < 0.016). There were no catastrophic failures in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Thinner polyethylene components demonstrated higher wear rates, although even the highest wear rate observed in the thinnest polyethylene specimen was lower than that commonly reported for noncrosslinked polyethylene components. While encouraging, these findings should be validated in vivo before clinical recommendations can be made.

Wear performance evaluation of a contemporary dual mobility hip bearing using multiple hip simulator testing conditions.

The dual mobility hip bearing concept combines a small bearing with a large diameter bearing through a dual articulation system, potentially increasing the stability of the hip. Bearings with two articulations introduce concerns of whether or not wear might be increased compared to a conventional bearing. We therefore evaluated the wear performance of a dual mobility hip bearing using sequentially cross-linked and annealed polyethylene under the conditions of impingement, abrasion, and when the mobile liner becomes immobilized at either the inner or outer diameter. We found the wear performance of this dual mobility hip is dictated by the conditions experienced by the smaller inner articulation and by the polyethylene material. The highest wearing group wore 75% less than a single articulating conventional gamma/inert polyethylene bearing.

Case report: analysis of an ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene acetabular cup retrieval at 41 years.

A polyethylene cup explanted after 41 years was examined using several analytical techniques to determine whether there was a material cause for the extremely low wear observed. Neither the amount of polyethylene oxidation nor crystallinity appeared to be a factor.

The influence of material and design on total knee replacement wear.

It is difficult for surgeons to make the decision on which design or material to use given the different options available. Marketing claims and direct-to-consumer advertising certainly complicate this further. One company may claim a higher percentage of wear reduction with their bearing surfaces compared with those of another manufacturer. If the percentage of wear reduction is lower, it is unclear as to whether this creates a more effective technology for reducing wear in the clinical situation. The relative contribution and relationship of design and materials to wear performance must be considered before making that important judgment. To examine the overall influence of implant design on wear reduction, a knee simulator study was undertaken. This simulator study compared the Oxinium Genesis II system with the Triathlon Conventional and Triathlon X3 knee systems under physiologic stair-climb loading and motion profiles. This allows a similar comparison of material effect within one design but also a global comparison across designs. Test results show the Triathlon Conventional and Triathlon X3 knee systems have superior wear resistance compared with that of the Genesis II Oxinium system under stair-climbing simulation. This finding indicates that implant design plays a more significant role in knee wear reduction than material. Although material technology may improve a given knee system's ability to wear, design geometry has a first-order effect and should be addressed before materials. This study represents an effort to differentiate design effect from two different approaches to material enhancement. The results of this study support the predominance of design in knee replacement wear performance. Ultimately, only clinical evidence such as published studies or outcomes reported in the available joint registries will establish whether any material or design can achieve a 30-year outcome.

Surface oxidized zirconium total hip arthroplasty head damage due to closed reduction effects on polyethylene wear.

Recent case studies of surface oxidized zirconium THA heads removed after attempted, closed reduction have shown significant surface damage that has been suggested as potentially deleterious to polyethylene wear. We obtained 4 clinically retrieved specimens, produced well-characterized surface damage on additional heads, and tested them on a hip simulator. After 1 million cycles, the amount of polyethylene wear was related to the extent of surface damage, the most damaged clinical specimen showing more than 50 times more wear than a new head. Although all heads after failed attempted closed reduction(s) should be replaced, surface oxidized zirconium heads are of particular concern; those patients with a successful, simple closed reduction should be monitored for excessive wear.

A highly crosslinked UHMWPE for CR and PS total knee arthroplasties.

X3 is a highly crosslinked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) produced by a sequential irradiation and annealing process. The sequential process results in a material with a free radical content that is 1% that of conventional UHMWPE gamma sterilized in nitrogen resulting in an oxidation resistance similar to that of virgin UHMWPE. Yield strength and ultimate tensile strength exceed American Society for Testing and Materials minimum rates for UHMWPE. Simulator testing of contemporary cruciate retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized knee inserts (Triathlon) manufactured by the sequential process demonstrated 68% and 64% less wear, respectively, compared to conventionally processed inserts. The wear and mechanical integrity of sequentially processed posterior-stabilized inserts was unaffected by accelerated aging, whereas conventional UHMWPE exhibited increased wear, cracking, and delamination.

Knee bearing technology: where is technology taking us?

A novel sequentially irradiated and annealed bearing material (X3), characterized for use in knee arthroplasty, has been developed. Attention was directed to mechanical strength properties, oxidation resistance, and the ability to reduce wear. Material properties such as ultimate tensile and yield strength were unaffected by the sequential cross-linking process. Elongation was reduced relative to GUR 1020 conventional polyethylene, but equivalent to that of direct compression molded 1900 material. In knee simulator testing for normal gait and stair climbing, measured wear rates for X3 polyethylene were reduced by 79% and 77% when compared to the same knee design using conventional polyethylene. Mechanical properties and wear characteristics of the X3 polyethylene were unaffected before and after exposure to accelerated aging; properties of conventional polyethylene were adversely impacted.