A Qualitative Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Medications for Opioid Use Disorder and HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis for Adolescents and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: The syndemic of substance use and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a well-recognized global phenomenon that threatens to undermine the priorities outlined by the National Institutes of Health "Ending the HIV Epidemic" initiative. There are few published studies on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with opioid use disorder (OUD) despite increasing availability of biomedical prevention options and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations to offer PrEP to this group. METHODS: Healthcare providers who previously prescribed medications for OUD (MOUDs) and/or PrEP for AYA were purposively sampled. Audio-recorded in-depth individual interviews were conducted using chart-stimulated recall to explore barriers and facilitators to integrated MOUD and HIV prevention services. Interviews were double-coded, and qualitative analysis was performed using a modified grounded theory. RESULTS: Of 19 providers sampled, most were physicians (63%). All recommended HIV screening at varying intervals; however, few counseled on (19%) or prescribed (11%) PrEP to patients on MOUD. Barriers to PrEP prescriptions included patient-level (ie, stigma surrounding PrEP use, adherence challenges, and competing social or mental healthcare needs), provider (perception of low risk, lack of training/experience), and system-level factors (including restricted visit types). Facilitators of PrEP prescriptions included patient-initiated requests, electronic health record system reminders, and the availability of consistent support staff (ie, navigators, certified recovery specialists). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that discussions about HIV prevention and PrEP prescriptions may be rare for AYA patients receiving MOUD. Further research is needed to develop interventions that increase the integration of PrEP delivery within the context of OUD care among this key AYA population.

Using Provider Incentives and an Opt-Out Strategy in a Successful Quality Initiative to Increase Chlamydia Screening.

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is a highly prevalent sexually transmitted infection in adolescents that can lead to serious complications. San Francisco has one of the highest rates of CT infections in the United States. At baseline, screening rates at the Children's Health Center were significantly below national and network levels. This project aimed to increase screening rates for female patients age 16-24 from 29.2% to 44% in an 18-month period. METHODS: The organization engaged providers, residents, and nursing staff to understand the root causes and choose the screening approach. The following strategies were used to implement this approach in primary and urgent care: (1) universal urine collection, (2) provider and staff education, and (3) adoption of faculty Maintenance of Certification (MOC) credit and resident physician financial incentives. RESULTS: The annual screening rate for CT in primary care female patients 16-24 years old increased from 29.2% to 61.5% in 18 months, and improved to 71.2% one year after the project. Screening rates for female patients over age 15 seen in the colocated urgent care also increased significantly. The research team found no instances of false positive results and had 4 positive results in high-risk patients who initially reported abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention design and engagement of stakeholders with incentives was associated with significant and sustainable improvements in the CT screening rate for female adolescent primary care patients. This work shows how universal opt-out screening can be a sustainable and effective method to address common barriers to increasing screening for CT in adolescents.