Surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients with confirmed COVID-19: Ten case reports and review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Research concerning postoperative outcomes of confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients revealed unfavorable postoperative results with increased morbidity, pulmonary complications and mortality. Case reports have suggested that COVID-19 is associated with more aggressive presentation of acute cholecystitis. The aim of the present study is to describe the perioperative assessment and postoperative outcomes of ten patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with concomitant acute cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy. CASE SUMMARY: We report a total of 10 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with concomitant acute cholecystitis that underwent cholecystectomy. Six patients were males, the mean age was 47.1 years. Nine patients had moderate acute cholecystitis, and one patient had severe acute cholecystitis. All patients were treated with urgent/early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Regarding the Parkland grading scale, two patients received a Parkland grade of 3, two patients received a Parkland grade of 4, and six patients received a Parkland grade of 5. Eight patients required a bail-out procedure. Four patients developed biliary leakage and required endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with biliary sphincterotomy. After surgery, five patients developed acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. One patient died after cholecystectomy due to ARDS complications. The mean total length of stay (LOS) was 18.2 d. The histopathology demonstrated transmural necrosis (n = 5), vessel obliteration with ischemia (n = 3), perforation (n = 3), and acute peritonitis (n = 10). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with acute cholecystitis had difficult cholecystectomies, high rates of ICU admission, and a prolonged LOS.

Laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis with compromised appendix base: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with compromised appendix base constitute a subgroup of patients with complicated appendicitis, and there is few available information. OBJECTIVE: To study the frequency of stump leaks and fistulae in patients with complicated appendicitis with compromised stump. METHOD: This is an observational, retrospective study of patients that underwent laparoscopic appendectomy with compromised appendix stump. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2019, 158 patients with complicated appendicitis were operated, of them 54 had compromised base or stump. There were 66.7% men, with a mean age of 38.7 years. For stump closure, a simple knot was employed in 57.4%, and in 42.6% an invaginated suture was employed. Regarding complications, 16.7% developed intraabdominal abscess, 7.4% ileus and 7.4% had wound infection. We found one stump leak and one stump fistula. The mean length of stay was 5.4 days (range: 1-20). There were 5 reoperations, 4 for abscess drainage and 1 for stump leak. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute complicated appendicitis with compromised appendicular base, laparoscopic surgery either with simple knot or with invaginated suture resulted in low frequency of stump leaks and fistula.

ANTECEDENTES: Los pacientes con base apendicular comprometida constituyen un subgrupo de pacientes con apendicitis complicada y existe poca información al respecto. OBJETIVO: Conocer la frecuencia de fístulas y fugas fecales en pacientes con apendicitis complicada con base apendicular comprometida. MÉTODO: Se trata de un estudio observacional, retrospectivo y transversal de pacientes operados de apendicectomía laparoscópica con base apendicular comprometida. RESULTADOS: De 2015 a 2019 se encontraron 158 casos de apendicitis complicada, de los cuales 54 tenían la base apendicular comprometida. Hubo predominio de varones (66.7%) y la edad media fue de 38.7 años. En el 57.4% de los casos se realizó un nudo simple y en el 42.6% un punto transfictivo con invaginación del muñón. En relación con las complicaciones, el 16.7% desarrollaron abscesos intraabdominales, el 7.4% íleo y el 7.4% infección de herida. Hubo un paciente con fuga del muñón y un paciente con fístula cecal. El tiempo medio de estancia hospitalaria fue de 5.4 días (rango: 1-20). Se realizaron cinco reintervenciones: cuatro para drenaje de absceso intraabdominal y una por fuga del muñón. CONCLUSIONES: En los pacientes con base apendicular comprometida, el manejo laparoscópico con ligadura simple o con punto transfictivo resulta en una baja frecuencia de fuga y fístula del muñón apendicular.

Sarcopenia predicts worse postoperative outcomes and decreased survival rates in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown an association of sarcopenia with adverse short- and long-term outcomes in multiple gastrointestinal cancer types. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of sarcopenia on the postoperative outcomes and survival rates of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases. We included studies that compared postoperative outcomes or survival rates in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients with CRC. RESULTS: A total of 44 observational studies, comprising 18,891 patients, were included. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 37% (n = 7009). The pooled analysis revealed an association between sarcopenia and higher risk of total postoperative complications (23 studies, OR = 1.84; 95% CI 1.35-2.49), postoperative severe complications (OR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.10-2.68), postoperative mortality (OR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.01-5.11), postoperative infections (OR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.12-1.76), postoperative cardiopulmonary complications (OR = 2.92; 95% CI 1.96-4.37), and prolonged length of stay (MD = 0.77; 95% CI 0.44-1.11) after colorectal cancer surgery. However, anastomotic leakage showed comparable occurrence between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.36). Regarding survival outcomes, sarcopenic patients had significantly shorter overall survival (25 studies, HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.57-2.14), disease-free survival (HR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.29-1.88), and cancer-specific survival (HR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.40-2.23) as compared with non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSION: Among patients with colorectal cancer, sarcopenia is a strong predictor of increased postoperative complications and worse survival outcomes.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis: a retrospective comparative study.

Patients with combined choledocholithiasis and cholecystitis require treatment of both diseases. The aim of our study was to analyze perioperative results of next-day (< 24 h) vs. early (> 24 h) laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones. We conducted a retrospective study of patients that underwent LC after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis, with combined diagnoses of common bile duct stones (with or without acute cholangitis) and gallbladder stones (with acute or chronic cholecystitis). From January 2014 to May 2017, 87 patients underwent LC after endoscopic sphincterotomy: 40 patients within 24 h (NDLC) and 47 after 24 h (ELC). Regarding pre-ERCP diagnosis, 29 (72.5%) of patients in the NDLC group and 33 (70.2%) of patients in the ELC group had high-risk of choledocholithiasis (p = 0.814), acute cholecystitis (32.5 vs. 25.5%, p = 0.474) and acute cholangitis (17.5 vs. 17%, p = 0.953). The median time from ERCP to LC was 23 h (IQR 22-23) in the NDLC group and 72 h (IQR 48-80) in the ELC group (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in regard to operative time, estimated blood loss, overall morbidity and rate of conversion to open surgery. Patients in the NDLC group had a shorter total length of stay (2 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within the first 24 h after endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis is safe and feasible, without increased postoperative morbidity and associated with reduction of the hospital length of stay.