Carotid stenosis assessed with a 4-dimensional semiautomated Doppler system.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare peak systolic velocities (PSVs) and the degree of stenosis obtained with a real-time 3-dimensional (ie, 4-dimensional) Doppler ultrasound scanner (Encore PV; VueSonix Sensors Inc, Wayne, PA) to conventional Doppler ultrasound imaging of the carotid arteries (common [CCA], internal [ICA], and external [ECA]). A secondary goal was to assess Encore volume flow measurements. METHODS: Seventy patients referred for clinical carotid ultrasound participated in this pilot study. Peak systolic velocities of the CCA, ECA, and ICA were obtained bilaterally. The degree of stenosis in the ICA was calculated based on the ICA PSV and ICA/CCA PSV ratio. The Encore detects all 3-dimensional blood flow velocity vectors within 10-s longitudinal volumes of the ICA, ECA, and CCA. On the Encore, a reader determined the centerline of the vessels. The PSV and volume flow were then automatically calculated. The flow measurement error was obtained by comparing the CCA flow to the ICA and ECA flow. Data were compared using linear regression, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Due to technical difficulties, only 59 patients (323 vessel segments) were available for analysis. There was good agreement between methods for assessing the degree of stenosis based on the ICA PSV (ICC = 0.83; P < .0001) and, to a lesser degree, on the ICA/CCA PSV ratio (ICC = 0.65; P < .0001). Peak systolic velocity measurements obtained with conventional ultrasound and the Encore correlated in all vessels (r >or= 0.32; P < .002), and Bland-Altman analysis showed reasonable variations. The Encore mean volume flow error +/- SD was -4.1% +/- 66.4% and was not biased (P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: A new semiautomated 4-dimensional Doppler device is comparable to conventional Doppler ultrasound for assessment of carotid stenosis.

Validating volume flow measurements from a novel semiautomated four-dimensional Doppler ultrasound scanner.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate measurement of blood volume flow (in ml/min) is an important clinical goal. This project compared in vitro and in vivo volume flow measurements obtained with a novel, real-time three-dimensional (i.e., four-dimensional) ultrasound scanner (Encore PV; Vuesonix Sensors, Wayne, PA) with those from an invasive transit time flowmeter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A flow pump was used to generate pulsatile flow rates from 60 to 600 ml/min. The Encore detected absolute blood velocity vectors within a volume. The scanner determined the centerline of the vessel and volume flow was then automatically calculated. Results were compared with those of an invasive technique for volumetric blood flow measurements utilizing a transit-time flowmeter (TS420; Transonic Systems Inc., Ithaca, NY). In vivo, 10 second datasets of the volume flow in the distal aorta of six rabbits were obtained simultaneously with the Encore PV and the flowmeter. Data were compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis (due to the lack of independence). RESULTS: In vitro, Encore and flowmeter measurements both matched the flow pump (r2 > 0.99; P < .0001) with mean errors of -11.8% and -0.3%, respectively. Marked underestimation of the true flow rates was encountered with the Encore at the lowest pump setting. In vivo mean volume flows between 10.6 and 79.3 ml/min were measured. Mean and maximum volume flows obtained with the two techniques correlated significantly (P < .0001) with r2 values of 0.86 and 0.62, respectively. The corresponding root-mean-square errors were 6.9% for mean flow and 61.2% for maximum volume flow measurements. CONCLUSION: A new semiautomated four-dimensional Doppler device has been tested in vitro and in vivo. Mean volume flow measurements with this unit are comparable to those of an invasive flowmeter.