Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Pain is the most disturbing symptom of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. As many as 45% of patients with diabetes mellitus develop peripheral neuropathies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of gabapentin monotherapy on pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial conducted between July 1996 and March 1997. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at 20 sites. PATIENTS: The 165 patients enrolled had a 1- to 5-year history of pain attributed to diabetic neuropathy and a minimum 40-mm pain score on the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire visual analogue scale. INTERVENTION: Gabapentin (titrated from 900 to 3600 mg/d or maximum tolerated dosage) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy measure was daily pain severity as measured on an 11-point Likert scale (0, no pain; 10, worst possible pain). Secondary measures included sleep interference scores, the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire scores, Patient Global Impression of Change and Clinical Global Impression of Change, the Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire scores, and the Profile of Mood States results. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients received gabapentin and 70 (83%) completed the study; 81 received placebo and 65 (80%) completed the study. By intent-to-treat analysis, gabapentin-treated patients' mean daily pain score at the study end point (baseline, 6.4; end point, 3.9; n = 82) was significantly lower (P<.001) compared with the placebo-treated patients' end-point score (baseline, 6.5; end point, 5.1; n = 80). All secondary outcome measures of pain were significantly better in the gabapentin group than in the placebo group. Additional statistically significant differences favoring gabapentin treatment were observed in measures of quality of life (Short Form-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire and Profile of Mood States). Adverse events experienced significantly more frequently in the gabapentin group were dizziness (20 [24%] in the gabapentin group vs 4 [4.9%] in the control group; P<.001) and somnolence (19 [23%] in the gabapentin group vs 5 [6%] in the control group; P = .003). Confusion was also more frequent in the gabapentin group (7 [8%] vs 1 [1.2%]; P = .06). CONCLUSION: Gabapentin monotherapy appears to be efficacious for the treatment of pain and sleep interference associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy and exhibits positive effects on mood and quality of life.

Inhibitors of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase: novel trisubstituted ureas as hypocholesterolemic agents.

Our continued interest in developing novel, potent acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) inhibitors, and our discovery of several active series of disubstituted urea ACAT inhibitors, have led us to investigate a series of trisubstituted ureas that are structural hybrids of our disubstituted series and of a trisubstituted urea ACAT inhibitor series disclosed by scientists at Lederle. This investigation has led to the discovery of novel trisubstituted ureas, several of which inhibit ACAT in the nanomolar range and effectively lower total plasma cholesterol when administered as a diet admixture in an acute model of hypercholesterolemia in rats. One analogue (35) also lowered total cholesterol as efficaciously as CL 277,082 in our chronic hypercholesterolemic rat model. The most notable finding of this study is that the SAR of the trisubstituted ureas diverges from that seen in our previously disclosed disubstituted urea series. This series showed optimal activity with 2,4-difluoro and 2,4,6-trifluoro substitution on the urea N-phenyl, whereas the disubstituted series showed optimal activity with bulky 2,6-disubstitution on the phenyl ring.

Divergent pharmacologic activities of PD 132301-2 and CL 277,082, urea inhibitors of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase.

The in vitro potencies and hypocholesterolemic properties of CL 277,082 and PD 132301-2, two urea inhibitors of acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) were compared. PD 132301-2 was several-fold more potent at inhibiting ACAT in microsomes from rat and rabbit tissues and in cultured cells (murine macrophages and the human HepG2 cell line). This disubstituted urea was also relatively specific for ACAT as other cholesterol esterifying enzymes (e.g., lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase, pancreatic cholesterol ester hydrolase), as well as intestinal diglyceride synthesis (acyl-CoA:monoglyceride acyltransferase), were unaffected in vitro at relevant concentrations. In normal chow-fed rats, both compounds reduced plasma triglycerides at doses > 50 mg/kg, but only PD 132301-2 reduced plasma cholesterol. In rat and rabbit models of hypercholesterolemia the greater in vitro potency of PD 132301-2 translated into greater in vivo efficacy (i.e., ED50 values 2- to 3-fold higher for CL 277,082 in both acute and chronic rate models). Of particular note was the greater elevation of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and parenteral activity of PD 132301-2 compared to CL 277,082 in the chronic rat model. Inhibition of cholesterol absorption in rats was also greater with PD 132301-2. In guinea pigs, in which 77% of plasma cholesterol was transported in low-density lipoprotein, PD 132301-2 potently reduced plasma total cholesterol (lowest significant dose = 1 mg/kg) as well as plasma triglycerides. CL 277,082 only reduced cholesterol at doses > 100 mg/kg in this low-density lipoprotein model. In a canine model of hypercholesterolemia CL 277,082 was inactive at doses up to 50 mg/kg, but PD 132301-2 was active at 3 mg/kg. Moreover, efficacy in dogs with PD 132301-2 was positively correlated with plasma drug concentration, an observation not previously demonstrated for other hypolipidemic drugs. The combined data illustrate that pharmacologic activities can vary widely among ACAT inhibitors of the same general class. In addition, the unique observation of proportionality between efficacy and blood drug levels in nonrodent animal models may not only help to simplify early stages in drug development but also may help to predict or monitor a direct action of the drug on vascular disease.