Lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum assisted delivery in nulliparous women (EVA): multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of lateral episiotomy, compared with no episiotomy, on obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women requiring vacuum extraction. DESIGN: A multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Eight hospitals in Sweden, 2017-23. PARTICIPANTS: 717 nulliparous women with a single live fetus of 34 gestational weeks or more, requiring vacuum extraction were randomly assigned (1:1) to lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy using sealed opaque envelopes. Randomisation was stratified by study site. INTERVENTION: A standardised lateral episiotomy was performed during the vacuum extraction, at crowning of the fetal head, starting 1-3 cm from the posterior fourchette, at a 60° (45-80°) angle from the midline, and 4 cm (3-5 cm) long. The comparison was no episiotomy unless considered indispensable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of the episiotomy in vacuum assisted delivery (EVA) trial was obstetric anal sphincter injury, clinically diagnosed by combined visual inspection and digital rectal and vaginal examination. The primary analysis used a modified intention-to-treat population that included all consenting women with attempted or successful vacuum extraction. As a result of an interim analysis at significance level P<0.01, the primary endpoint was tested at 4% significance level with accompanying 96% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: From 1 July 2017 to 15 February 2023, 717 women were randomly assigned: 354 (49%) to lateral episiotomy and 363 (51%) to no episiotomy. Before vacuum extraction attempt, one woman withdrew consent and 14 had a spontaneous birth, leaving 702 for the primary analysis. In the intervention group, 21 (6%) of 344 women sustained obstetric anal sphincter injury, compared with 47 (13%) of 358 women in the comparison group (P=0.002). The risk difference was -7.0% (96% CI -11.7% to -2.5%). The risk ratio adjusted for site was 0.47 (96% CI 0.23 to 0.97) and unadjusted risk ratio was 0.46 (0.28 to 0.78). No significant differences were noted between groups in postpartum pain, blood loss, neonatal outcomes, or total adverse events, but the intervention group had more wound infections and dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Lateral episiotomy can be recommended for nulliparous women requiring vacuum extraction to significantly reduce the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02643108.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury in the second birth after perineal wound complication in the first birth: A nationwide register cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether perineal wound complications in the first birth, alone or in conjunction with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), is associated with an increased risk of OASI in the second birth. DESIGN: Nationwide population-based cohort study. SETTING: Sweden. POPULATION: Women (n = 411 317) with first and second singleton vaginal births in Sweden, 2001-2019. METHODS: Data on diagnostic codes and surgical procedures were retrieved from the Swedish Medical Birth Register and the Swedish Patient Register. A perineal wound complication was defined as wound infection, dehiscence or perineal haematoma within 2 months of childbirth. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between wound complications in the first birth and OASI in the second birth were investigated with logistic regression and presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: In total, 2619 (0.6%) women had a wound complication in the first birth, and 5318 (1.3%) had an OASI in the second birth. Women with a wound complication but no OASI in the first birth had more than doubled odds of OASI in the second birth (aOR 2.73, 95% CI 2.11-3.53). Women with OASI and a wound complication in the first birth had almost tenfold odds (aOR 9.97, 95% CI 6.53-15.24) of recurrent OASI. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal wound complication in the first birth increases the likelihood of OASI in a subsequent birth.

Outcomes in children after mild neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: A population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether mild neonatal hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) in term born infants is associated with cerebral palsy, epilepsy, mental retardation and death up to 6 years of age. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study. SETTING: Sweden, 2009-2015. POPULATION: Live term born infants without congenital malformations or chromosomal abnormalities (n = 505 075). METHODS: Birth and health data were retrieved from Swedish national health and quality registers. Mild HIE was identified by diagnosis in either the Swedish Medical Birth Register or the Swedish Neonatal Quality Register. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A composite of the outcomes cerebral palsy, epilepsy, mental retardation and death up to 6 years of age. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 3.3 years after birth. Of 414 infants diagnosed with mild HIE, 17 were classified according to the composite outcome and incidence rates were 12.6 and 2.9 per 1000 child-years in infants with and without HIE respectively. Infants with mild HIE was four times as likely to be diagnosed with the composite outcome (HR 4.42, 95% CI 2.75-7.12) compared with infants without HIE. When analysed separately, associations were found with cerebral palsy (HR 21.50, 95% CI 9.59-48.19) and death (HR 19.10, 95% CI 7.90-46.21). HRs remained essentially unchanged after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Mild neonatal HIE was associated with neurological morbidity and mortality in childhood. Challenges include identifying infants who may develop morbidity and how to prevent adverse outcomes.

[Incidence and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy - A comparative study between two Swedish regions]. / Lungemboli under graviditet ­ en jämförelse av rutiner i två regioner.

Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy is a potentially life-threatening condition and the second leading cause of maternal mortality in Sweden. Diagnosis during pregnancy is challenging, and radiologic diagnostic modality is important. The incidence of pulmonary embolism among pregnant women in the Swedish region of Dalarna was 47.8/100 000 women aged 15-49 years in 2016, compared with 5.4/100 000 women in the region of Värmland, which is a region comparable in size and population. This study aimed to investigate differences in clinical practice and choice of imaging modality among pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism in the two regions during 2013-2017. There was no difference in background maternal characteristics, but the primary modality of diagnostic imaging was lung scintigraphy in Dalarna (79 percent), whereas computed tomography pulmonary angiography was performed in 75 percent of the cases in Värmland (P < 0.01). There were more women with a confirmed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism after diagnostic imaging in Dalarna (25 percent, n = 65) compared to Värmland (5 percent, n = 8) (P < 0,.01). Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in more than one quarter of women investigated with scintigraphy, compared to 6 percent when computed tomography was performed.

Overall childbirth experience: what does it mean? A comparison between an overall childbirth experience rating and the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.

BACKGROUND: In clinical settings and research studies, childbirth experience is often measured using a single-item question about overall experience. Little is known about what women include in this rating, which complicates the design of adequate follow-up, as well as the interpretation of research findings based on ratings of overall childbirth experience. The aim of this study was to examine which known dimensions of childbirth experience women include in the rating on a single-item measure. METHODS: Ratings of overall childbirth experience on a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 2953 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labour at two Swedish hospitals were evaluated against the validated Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2 (CEQ2), completed on one of the first days postpartum. The CEQ2 measures four childbirth experience domains: own capacity, perceived safety, professional support and participation. Internal consistency for CEQ2 was evaluated by calculating Cronbach's alpha. NRS ratings were explored in relation to CEQ2 using empirical cumulative distribution function graphs, where childbirth experience was defined as negative (NRS ratings 1-4), mixed (NRS ratings 5-6) or positive (NRS ratings 7-10). A multiple linear regression analysis, presented as beta coefficients (B) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), was also performed to explore the relationship between the four domains of the CEQ2 and overall childbirth experience. RESULTS: The prevalence of negative childbirth experience was 6.3%. All CEQ2-subscales reached high or acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78; 0.81; 0.69 and 0.66, respectively). Regardless of overall childbirth experience, the majority of respondents scored high on the CEQ2 subscale representing professional support. Overall childbirth experience was mainly explained by perceived safety (B = 1.60, CI 1.48-1.73), followed by own capacity (B = 0.65, CI 0.53-0.77) and participation (B = 0.43, CI 0.29-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, overall childbirth experience rated by a single-item measurement appears to mainly capture experiences of perceived safety, and to a lesser extent own capacity and participation, but appears not to reflect professional support. CEQ2 shows good psychometric properties for use shortly after childbirth, and among women with induced onset of labour, which increases the usability of the instrument.

Negative childbirth experience in relation to mode of birth and events during labour: A mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore descriptions of negative childbirth experience in relation to mode of birth and events during labour. DESIGN: A descriptive study using a convergent mixed methods design. Written responses to open-ended online questions regarding negative childbirth experience were explored using qualitative content analysis. Generated sub-themes were quantified, and stratified on mode of birth and events during labour. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 112 women with low ratings of overall childbirth experience, participating in a randomised controlled trial evaluating internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy in Sweden. Qualitative data were collected before randomisation, three months postpartum. RESULTS: Four sub-themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: Experiencing fear-based emotions, Experiencing physical distress, Being affected by caregivers' and partner's behaviour and Being affected by bad facilities and poor organisation. Only small differences were found when stratifying sub-themes on mode of birth and events during labour. Regardless of mode of birth and events during labour, the childbirth experience was dominated by fear-based emotions. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Mixed-methods analyses demonstrate the challenges in understanding negative childbirth experience in relation to mode of birth and specific events during labour, with results clearly showing the multifaceted nature of this concept. The central role of fear in relation to negative childbirth experience should be considered when designing support during and after labour, to prevent adverse effects of the childbirth experience.

Low-dose aspirin use in pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth: a Swedish register-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity. Women who have had a previous preterm birth are at increased risk for preterm birth in their subsequent pregnancies. Low-dose aspirin use reduces the risk for preterm birth among women at risk of developing preeclampsia, however, it is unclear whether low-dose aspirin may reduce the risk of recurrent preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between low-dose aspirin use and preterm birth among women with a previous preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a Swedish register-based cohort study and included women who had a first and second pregnancy between 2006 and 2019, with the first pregnancy ending in preterm birth (medically indicated or with spontaneous onset <37 weeks of gestation). The association between low-dose aspirin use and preterm birth in the second pregnancy was estimated via logistic regression via standardization and expressed as marginal relative risks with the 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Among the study cohort (N=22,127), 3057 women (14%) were prescribed low-dose aspirin during their second pregnancy and 3703 women (17%) gave birth prematurely. Low-dose aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk for preterm birth, (marginal relative risk, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.99). There were no statistically significant associations between low-dose aspirin use and an altered risk for moderate preterm birth, defined as birth between 32 and 36 weeks' gestation (marginal relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.03), or very preterm birth, defined as birth <32 weeks' gestation (marginal relative risk, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.04). Regarding the onset of preterm birth, low-dose aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk for spontaneous preterm birth (marginal relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.86) but no reduction in the risk for medically indicated preterm birth (marginal relative risk, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.30) was observed. CONCLUSION: Among women with a previous preterm birth, low-dose aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk for preterm birth. When investigating preterm birth by onset in the second pregnancy, low-dose aspirin use was associated with a reduced risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Our results suggest that low-dose aspirin may be an effective prophylaxis for recurrent preterm birth.

Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Singleton Nulliparous Spontaneous Preterm Birth with and without Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes-A National Population-Based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Preterm birth (PTB, birth before 37 gestational weeks) is the leading cause of neonatal death and a major challenge for obstetric and neonatal care. About two-thirds of PTBs are spontaneous PTB (sPTB), of which approximately 30% start with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). The aim of the study was to investigate risk factors and maternal and perinatal outcomes in sPTB with and without PPROM. STUDY DESIGN: This is a national population-based cohort study including all singleton pregnancies in nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor and vaginal births (n = 266,968) registered in the Swedish Medical Birth Register 2005 to 2014. sPTB with PPROM (sPTB-PPROM) and sPTB without PPROM were compared regarding risk factors and maternal and perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adjustments were made for maternal age, body mass index, country of birth, smoking, chronic hypertension, pregestational and gestational diabetes, and gestational length. RESULTS: sPTB-PPROM (n = 5,037), compared with sPTB without PPROM (n = 8,426), was more common in women with previous spontaneous abortions, prepregnancy urinary tract infections, chronic hypertension, and gestational diabetes and had a higher risk of postpartum endometritis (aOR: 2.78, 95% CI: 1.55-5.00). Infants born to women with sPTB-PPROM had a lower risk of birth asphyxia (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.43-0.83), respiratory distress syndrome (aOR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.00), retinopathy of prematurity (aOR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.94), necrotizing enterocolitis (aOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94-0.96), and higher risk of hypoglycemia (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.28), and hyperbilirubinemia (aOR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.19-1.38) compared with infants born to sPTB without PPROM. CONCLUSION: Our findings of risk factors and distinct differences in adverse outcomes after sPTB-PPROM compared with sPTB without PPROM are of vital importance and might serve as a basis when elaborating programs for the prevention and management of PPROM. KEY POINTS: · This is a large cohort study of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).. · Singleton nulliparous sPTB with/without preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM) were studied.. · Distinct differences in adverse perinatal outcomes in sPTB with and without PPROM were observed..

Negative childbirth experience - what matters most? a register-based study of risk factors in three time periods during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of risk factors representing three different time periods during pregnancy on negative childbirth experience. METHODS: This was a register-based cohort study of 80482 primiparas giving birth to singleton, term infants in Sweden 2013-2018, elective caesarean sections (CS) excluded. Hierarchical logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in three blocks, each representing risk factors from one of three time periods: I) before pregnancy, II) pregnancy, III) childbirth. RESULTS: Of the pre-gestational factors, only poor self-rated health (SRH) remained associated with negative childbirth experience after adjustment for pregnancy- and childbirth-related factors (aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.34). Psychiatric care during pregnancy and fear of childbirth were both associated with negative birth experience (aOR 1.51, 95% CI 1.35-1.69; aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.32-1.70), as were all childbirth-related factors included in the model. Women giving birth operatively vaginally or by unplanned CS under regional anaesthesia had three-fold higher ORs for rating their overall childbirth experience as negative (aOR 3.29, 95% CI 3.04-3.57; aOR 3.07, 95% CI 2.80-3.38). The highest OR, 5.44, was seen among women undergoing unplanned CS under general anaesthesia (95% CI 4.55-6.50). CONCLUSION: The main contributing factors to negative childbirth experience are related to labour and birth, but poor SRH prior to pregnancy, together with psychiatric care during pregnancy and fear of childbirth, place the woman in a vulnerable position, and require extra attention.

Alcohol exposure prior to pregnancy-does hazardous consumption affect placenta- and inflammatory-mediated pregnancy outcomes? A Swedish population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol consumption during pregnancy is related to severe birth complications such as low birthweight, preterm birth and birth defects. During the last decade, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) has been used as a screening tool in Swedish maternal healthcare units to identify hazardous, pre-pregnancy alcohol use. However, evaluation of the screening with AUDIT, as well as adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes, has not been assessed at a national level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a population-based cohort study of 530 458 births from 2013 to 2018 using demographic, reproductive and maternal health data from the Swedish Pregnancy Register. Self-reported alcohol consumption in the year before pregnancy, measured as AUDIT scores, was categorized into moderate (6-13 points) and high-risk (14-40 points) consumption, with low-risk (0-5 points) consumption as the reference group. Associations with pregnancy- and birth outcomes were explored with logistic regressions using generalized estimating equation models, adjusting for maternal and socioeconomic characteristics. Estimates are presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: High-risk and moderate pre-pregnancy alcohol consumption was associated with preeclampsia, preterm birth and birth of an infant small for gestational age (SGA), but these associations were nonsignificant after adjustments. Prior moderate-risk (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17-1.42) and high-risk consumption (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.25) increased the likelihood of intrapartum and neonatal infections. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from identifying hazardous alcohol consumption prior to pregnancy and the offer of counseling, screening with the AUDIT in early pregnancy indicates a high risk of inflammatory-/placenta-mediated pregnancy and birth outcomes. For most outcomes, AUDIT was not an independent contributor when adjusting for confounding factors. Hazardous alcohol use prior to pregnancy was independently linked to intrapartum and neonatal infections; conditions associated with morbidity and long-term sequalae. These associations may be explained by alcohol-induced changes in the maternal or fetal immune system in early pregnancy or persistent alcohol intake during pregnancy, or may depend on unidentified confounding factors.

A hybrid type I, multi-center randomized controlled trial to study the implementation of a method for Sustained cord circulation And VEntilation (the SAVE-method) of late preterm and term neonates: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: An intact umbilical cord allows the physiological transfusion of blood from the placenta to the neonate, which reduces infant iron deficiency and is associated with improved development during early childhood. The implementation of delayed cord clamping practice varies depending on mode of delivery, as well as gestational age and neonatal compromise. Emerging evidence shows that infants requiring resuscitation would benefit if respiratory support were provided with the umbilical cord intact. Common barriers to providing intact cord resuscitation is the availability of neonatal resuscitation equipment close to the mother, organizational readiness for change as well as attitudes and beliefs about placental transfusion within the multidisciplinary team. Hence, clinical evaluations of cord clamping practice should include implementation outcomes in order to develop strategies for optimal cord management practice. METHODS: The Sustained cord circulation And Ventilation (SAVE) study is a hybrid type I randomized controlled study combining the evaluation of clinical outcomes with implementation and health service outcomes. In phase I of the study, a method for providing in-bed intact cord resuscitation was developed, in phase II of the study the intervention was adapted to be used in multiple settings. In phase III of the study, a full-scale multicenter study will be initiated with concurrent evaluation of clinical, implementation and health service outcomes. Clinical data on neonatal outcomes will be recorded at the labor and neonatal units. Implementation outcomes will be collected from electronic surveys sent to parents as well as staff and managers within the birth and neonatal units. Descriptive and comparative statistics and regression modelling will be used for analysis. Quantitative data will be supplemented by qualitative methods using a thematic analysis with an inductive approach. DISCUSSION: The SAVE study enables the safe development and evaluation of a method for intact cord resuscitation in a multicenter trial. The study identifies barriers and facilitators for intact cord resuscitation. The knowledge provided from the study will be of benefit for the development of cord clamping practice in different challenging clinical settings and provide evidence for development of clinical guidelines regarding optimal cord clamping. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04070560 . Registered 28 August 2019.

Fetal station at caesarean section and risk of subsequent preterm birth - A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: An increased risk of preterm birth (PTB) following a caesarean section (CS) in the second stage of labor has been demonstrated. We aimed to investigate the relationship between the station of the presenting fetal part and the surgical technique at first CS, and the risk of subsequent PTB. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study of 11,850 women in Sweden, delivered by CS in 2001-2007 at any of 23 birth units, with a second delivery in 2001-2009. Clinical information was retrieved from electronic birth records linked to national health registers. The risk of subsequent PTB was analyzed by fetal station, defined as low (at or below the ischial spines) or high (above the ischial spines), and aspects of the surgical technique at index CS. Associations were explored with logistic regression and results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), by type and severity (very early < 32 gestational weeks and moderate preterm 32-36 gestational weeks) of PTB. Multiple logistic regression included adjustments for maternal age, gestational age at first delivery, and inter-delivery interval. RESULTS: Out of 11,850 women delivered by CS, 1,016 (8.6%) delivered preterm in their subsequent pregnancy. There was an increased likelihood of spontaneous PTB, but not with medically indicated PTB, after an index CS with the fetal presenting part at a low station (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.23-2.11). CS performed at a low station was associated with birth < 32 gestational weeks (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.84) and birth at 32-36 gestational weeks (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00-1.65), compared with high fetal station. Thickness of the uterine wall, incision type, and closure of the uterus at index CS did not affect the risk. CONCLUSION: A primary CS at a low station was associated with a subsequent spontaneous PTB, but not medically indicated PTB. Surgical technique at index CS did not alter the risk.

Low-Dose Aspirin for Preventing Birth of a Small-For-Gestational Age Neonate in a Subsequent Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether low-dose aspirin use is associated with an altered risk of delivering a small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonate among women with a history of having an SGA neonate in a prior pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a Swedish register-based cohort study including women in their second pregnancy who had a history of having an SGA neonate (birth weight less than the 10th percentile). The association between use of low-dose aspirin in subsequent pregnancy and birth of an SGA neonate or a severely SGA neonate (birth weight less than the third percentile) were estimated using inverse propensity-weighted estimation, accounting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 8,416 women who gave birth to an SGA neonate in their first pregnancy, 801 (9.5%) used low-dose aspirin during their second pregnancy. The incidence of SGA neonates was similar among women using low-dose aspirin (21.7%) and those who did not use aspirin (20.7%). Low-dose aspirin use in pregnancy was not associated with an altered risk of having an SGA neonate (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.10) or a severely SGA neonate (aRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71-1.34). Given the strong association between preeclampsia and SGA, we performed subgroup analyses based on preeclampsia status. Among women who had an SGA neonate and co-existing preeclampsia in their first pregnancy, low-dose aspirin was not associated with an altered risk of having an SGA (aRR 0.83, 95% CI 0.63-1.10) or severely SGA (aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.73-1.44) neonate. Additionally, no association was seen among women who developed preeclampsia in their second pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Among women with a history of having an SGA neonate, low-dose aspirin was not associated with a decreased risk of having an SGA or severely SGA neonate in subsequent pregnancy. These findings suggest that low-dose aspirin should not be used to prevent recurrent SGA.

Internet-based Treatment for Vulvodynia (EMBLA) - A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Internet-based ACT (Acceptance and commitment therapy) treatment may improve accessibility and reduce stigma related to seeking health care, but there are a lack of studies investigating internet-based treatment using ACT principles for women with vulvodynia. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of an internet-based treatment of pain during intercourse for women with provoked vulvodynia compared with no intervention during the waiting period before clinical treatment. METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted during 2016 to 2020, in which 99 participants were included. Participants were randomized to either a 6 week guided internet-based treatment using ACT principles or usual care. Data were collected at baseline, 6 weeks after baseline, and approximately 10 months after baseline. OUTCOMES: Pain-related (pain during intercourse, tampon test, impact of pain on sexual function) and pain behavior-related outcomes (attempts at intercourse, sexual activities besides intercourse, willingness to perform the tampon test, chronic pain acceptance questionnaire) were used as outcomes. RESULTS: Treatment was efficacious in what concerns pain during intercourse and pain acceptance. Less pain during intercourse among women in the intervention group was observed at both post-treatment (primary endpoint, P = .01, Cohen's d = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.33, 2.4), and follow-up (P = .04). Absolut mean difference between groups for pain during intercourse at post-treatment was -2.84, (95 % CI = -4.91, -0.78), and -1.58 at follow-up, (95 % CI = -3.17, 0.02), where the intervention group rated less pain than controls. No differences between groups over time were found for tampon test measures or impact of pain on sexual function. There was a significant difference between groups at all timepoints indicating fewer attempts at intercourse among participants in the intervention group. At post-treatment, women who underwent internet-based treatment reported higher pain acceptance and a rise in activity engagement compared with the control group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is an indication that internet-based treatment could be incorporated into clinical practice as a complement to clinical treatment. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Study strengths included using several forms of recruitment and an intervention built by different professions with long experience of treating patients with vulvodynia. High dropout rate was a limitation of this study. CONCLUSION: Internet-based treatment may have an impact on pain during intercourse and positive effects on pain acceptance. However, conclusions must be drawn with caution due to the small sample size. Engström AH, Bohm-Starke N, Kullinger M, et al. Internet-based Treatment for Vulvodynia (EMBLA) - A Randomized Controlled Study. J Sex Med 2022;19:319-330.

Attitudes and knowledge regarding episiotomy use and technique in vacuum extraction: A web-based survey among doctors in Sweden.

OBJECTIVES: Correct episiotomy use and technique may prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries. We aimed to explore the attitudes, use, and technique regarding episiotomy among doctors in Sweden, and their willingness to contribute to a randomized controlled trial of lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum extraction in nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: A web-based survey was sent to members of the Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (n = 2140). The survey included 31 questions addressing personal characteristics, use of episiotomy, a two-dimensional picture on which the respondents drew an episiotomy, and questions regarding attitudes towards episiotomy and participation in a randomized controlled trial. We calculated the proportion of supposedly protective episiotomies (fulfilling criteria of a lateral or mediolateral episiotomy and a length ≥ 30 mm). We compared the results between obstetricians, gynecologists, and residents using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests for differences between groups, and logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of drawing a protective episiotomy. RESULTS: We received 432 responses. Doctors without a vacuum delivery in the past year were excluded, leaving 384 respondents for further analyses. In all, 222 (57.8%) doctors reported use of episiotomy in<50% of vacuum extractions. We obtained 308 illustrated episiotomies with a median angle of 53°, incision point distance from the midline of 21 mm, and length of 36 mm, corresponding to a lateral episiotomy. Few doctors combined these parameters correctly resulting in 167 (54.2%) incorrectly drawn episiotomies. Residents drew shorter episiotomies than obstetricians and gynecologists. Doctors ranked episiotomy the least important intervention to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries in vacuum extraction. Doctors contributing to an ongoing randomized controlled trial of lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum extraction were more able to draw a protective episiotomy (OR 3.69, 95% confidence interval 1.94-7.02). CONCLUSIONS: Doctors in Sweden reported restrictive use of episiotomy in vacuum extraction and depicted lateral type episiotomies, although the majority were incorrectly drawn. Preventive episiotomy was ranked of low importance. Our results imply a need for education, training, and guidelines to increase uptake of correct episiotomy technique, which could result in improved prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Provision of long-acting reversible contraception at surgical abortion-A cross-sectional nationwide register study.

INTRODUCTION: Provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) at surgical abortion is safe, practical, and leads to higher user rates than does delayed provision. The aim of this study was to explore whether provision of LARC at surgical abortion is associated with known risk factors for subsequent abortions and inconsistent use of contraception, including sociodemographic factors and psychiatric disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a register-based cross-sectional study of 6251 women having a surgical abortion in Sweden. Data were collected from National health and population registers. Women with procedure codes for surgical abortion were identified in the National Patient Register from October 2016 to December 2018. Information from Statistics Sweden, the National Patient Register, and the Swedish prescribed drug register on sociodemographic factors, psychiatric disorders, and dispensed LARC was added and linked on an individual level. Associations of sociodemographic factors and psychiatric disorders with LARC provision were explored with generalized logit mixed models and presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The overall rate of LARC provision at the time of the abortion was 2515/6251 (40.2%). Younger age and lower level of education were associated with an increased likelihood of LARC provision. In the study population, 2624/6251 (42.0%) patients had a pre- or post-abortion psychiatric disorder, a factor associated with an increased likelihood of LARC provision compared with women with no such disorders (adjusted odds ratio 1.21; 95% CI 1.08-1.34). The highest rates and odds were seen among women with personality, substance use, and/or neurodevelopmental disorders and among women with multiple psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic risk factors and psychiatric disorders were associated with increased LARC provision at surgical abortion, indicating that women at high risk of unwanted pregnancies are provided with effective contraception. Still, less than half of all women undergoing surgical abortion were provided with LARC, suggesting that contraceptive access and counseling prior to a surgical abortion can be improved.

Episiotomy or not? Midwives' experiences of recruiting to a randomized controlled trial during pregnancy and labor - A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: The performance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is dependent on recruitment. Recruiting women to RCTs regarding interventions during childbirth may be difficult due to time constraints and their vulnerable situation. Midwives play a major role in such recruitment. Few studies have investigated the views and experiences of recruiters. The aim of this study was to describe midwives' experiences of recruiting pregnant women regarding an RCT of lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum-assisted delivery. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 19 midwives were interviewed regarding their experiences. The midwives worked at antenatal health care centers or labor wards. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Four categories appeared during the analysis, including "experiences and perceptions of providing trial information" and "the right timing in providing trial information," which varied among the midwives. Midwives' perceptions of how the women provided consent or declined participation, and the women's views and questions about the randomization and intervention, were summarized as "experiences of how the trial information was received by the women." In the final category, "perceived trial apprehensions and concerns," some midwives described ethical concerns related to the intervention and financial compensation to the staff involved. CONCLUSIONS: Midwives as recruiters would benefit from education and training in incorporating basic and advanced details of trial design and research methods, as well as training and support in recruitment. Awareness and management of the variation among potential recruiters is important when designing and performing an RCT.