Availability of Interventional Oncology in Germany in the Years 2018 and 2019 - Results from a Nationwide Database (DeGIR Registry Data). / Flächendeckende Versorgung mit radiologisch durchgeführten Verfahren zur interventionell-onkologischen Tumortherapie in Deutschland in den Jahren 2018 und 2019 dargestellt anhand der DeGIR-Registerdaten.

OBJECTIVE: Over the past few decades, radiology has established itself in tumor therapy through interventional oncology including innovative and efficient procedures for minimalinvasive treatment of various tumor entities besides the "classic" therapeutic options such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.Aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which interventional oncology can provide nationwide care using the data from the register of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR registry), which records radiological interventions as part of quality assurance. METHODS: The numbers of interventions of participating clinics, which were recorded as part of module D (oncological procedures including TACE or other tumor-specific embolization, ablation, percutaneous tumor therapy) and identified by the DeGIR registry between 2018 and 2019, were analyzed retrospectively. The collected intervention data were evaluated regarding federal states and 40 smaller regions (administrative districts and former administrative districts). RESULTS: In 2018, 11 653 oncological interventions in 187 clinics were recorded by the DeGIR registry. In 2019, the number of participating clinics rose to 216 and the number of oncological interventions increased by 6 % to 12 323. The average number of oncological interventions per clinic decreased slightly from 62.5 (2018) to 57.1 (2019). The DeGIR requirement for being certified as a training center was met by 116 clinics in 2018 including 31 clinics with more than 100 interventions and 129 clinics in 2019 including 36 with more than 100 interventions. Oncological interventions have been performed in each of the 40 regions. An average of 599 interventions per region (standard deviation of 414) was recorded in the period between 2018 and 2019. CONCLUSION: Based on the distribution of the documented oncological interventions at federal state level as well as the district level, the supply of interventional tumor therapy depends on the geographical location. Therefore, the demand of oncological interventions might not be sufficiently covered in some regions. KEY POINTS: · Interventional-oncological tumor therapies are performed throughout Germany. · Looking at the notable geographical differences, the need for interventional oncological procedures does not seem to be sufficiently met.. · In order to improve the comprehensive provision of oncological interventions, the training of interventional radiologists should be promoted further.. CITATION FORMAT: · Radosa CG, Nadjiri J, Mahnken AH et al. Availability of Interventional Oncology in Germany in the Years 2018 and 2019 - Results from a Nationwide Database (DeGIR Registry Data). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 755 - 761.

Availability of interventional-radiological revascularization procedures in Germany - an analysis of the DeGIR Registry Data 2018/19. / Versorgungslage mit interventionell-radiologischer Gefäßrevaskularisation in Deutschland ­ eine Analyse der DEGIR-Registerdaten 2018/19.

PURPOSE: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common condition with high socio-economic relevance. Therefore, qualified nationwide provision of interventional treatments of PAD is important for maintaining a high quality medical service in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All data on revascularization procedures from the quality management system of the German interventional radiological society (DeGIR) for the years 2018 and 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Number and distribution of DeGIR certified endovascular specialists and treatment centres was mapped. Documented procedures were broken down to the level of administrative districts. Absolute number of revascularization procedures and normalized number per one million inhabitants were computed. RESULTS: In 2019 there were 57 732 revascularization procedures from 228 participating centres performed by DeGIR certified interventional radiologists. A median of 62 recanalization procedures were documented per centre. 36 centres were considered to be high volume centres, with more than 500 procedures each. On a regional level in the years 2018 and 2019 combined a median (range) of 2324 (323-12 518) revascularization procedures per administrative district were performed by DeGIR certified interventional radiologist. CONCLUSION: There is a comprehensive nationwide high quality interventional-radiology service for the provision of revascularization procedures available in Germany. KEY POINTS: · In Germany there is a nationwide comprehensive infratsructure for the interventional-radiological treatment of PAD. · The volume of interventional-radiological treatments for PAD is growing. · There is a sufficient number of training and treatment centres for the delivery of interventional radiology procedures. CITATION FORMAT: · Mahnken AH, Nadjiri J, Schachtner B et al. Availability of interventional-radiological revascularization procedures in Germany - an analysis of the DeGIR Registry Data 2018/19. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 160 - 168.

DeGIR Quality Report 2019: Report on the treatment quality of minimally invasive methods - Interventional therapy (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. / DeGIR-Qualitätsreport 2019: Bericht über die Behandlungsqualität minimalinvasiver Methoden ­ interventionelle Therapie (EVAR) von abdominellen Aortenaneurysmen.

PURPOSE: To analyze the quality of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using the data of the DeGIR quality management system. Comparison of data between 2011 and 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all data registered in the DeGIR quality management system of the year 2019 was performed regarding the treatment quality for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Registration of data was voluntary. As quality parameters indication, treatment process data and quality of results were examined. The latter was judged by treatment success, complication rates and radiation exposure. RESULTS: Out of 189 590 data sets overall 1639 cases of EVAR were registered; compared to 2011 this was an increase of 472 cases. 5.9 % of these cases encompassed emergency treatments. The most frequent indication was an abdominal aneurysm with 72 % of cases. In 54 % of cases, the aortic diameter ranged 50-70 mm. The rates for technical success, over all complications and major complications were 92.8 %, 6.7 % and 6.0 % respectively for all EVAR including emergency indications. In general, EVAR yielded a mortality rate of 1.2 % while emergency procedures had a mortality rate of 7.3 %. Median dose area product and fluoroscopy time were 10 503 cGy × cm2 and 20 minutes respectively at a mean procedure time of 114 minutes. CONCLUSION: Data analysis of the DeGIR quality management system persistently showed a very high technical success rate for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair performed by interventional radiologists accompanied by a low complication rate. KEY POINTS: · The voluntary DeGIR quality assurance-system has reached high acceptance among interventional radiologists.. · The database has nearly 200 000 submissions on record for 2019.. · EVAR by interventional radiologists has shown very high technical success as well as a low complication rate.. CITATION FORMAT: · Frenzel F, Bücker A, Paprottka P et al. DeGIR Quality Report 2019: Report on the treatment quality of minimally invasive methods - Interventional therapy (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 49 - 61.

Diagnostic Reference Levels for Diagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Procedures in Germany: Update and Handling. / Diagnostische Referenzwerte für diagnostische und interventionelle Röntgenanwendungen in Deutschland: Aktualisierung und Handhabung.

PURPOSE: Recent developments in medical technology have broadened the spectrum of X-ray procedures and changed exposure practice in X-ray facilities. For this reason, diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures were updated in 2016 and 2018, respectively. It is the aim of this paper to present the procedure for the update of the DRLs and to give advice on their practical application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For the determination of DRLs, data from different independent sources that collect dose-relevant data from different facilities in Germany were considered. Seven different weight intervals were specified for classifying pediatric X-ray procedures. For each X-ray procedure considered, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of the respective national distribution of the dose-relevant parameters were determined. Additionally, effective doses that correspond to the DRLs were estimated. RESULTS: In procedures with already existing DRLs before 2016, the values were lowered by circa 20 % on average. Numerous DRLs were established for the first time (9 for interventional procedures, 10 for CT examinations). CONCLUSION: For dose optimizations even below the new national DRLs, the BfS recommends establishing local reference levels, using dose management software (particularly in CT and interventional radiology), adapting dose-relevant parameters of X-ray protocols to the individual patient size, and establishing internal radiation protection teams responsible for optimizing X-ray procedures in clinical practice. When applying good medical practice and using modern equipment, the median dose values of the nationwide dose distributions can not only be easily achieved but can even be undercut. KEY POINTS: · German diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) für diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures were updated in 2016 and 2018, respectively.. · For X-ray procedures for which DRLs existed already before the update, the updated DLRs were lowered by circa 20 %, on average.. · For CT and interventional radiology, new DRLs were established.. · X-ray procedures have to be optimized even below the DRLs.. CITATION FORMAT: · Schegerer A, Loose R, Heuser LJ et al. Diagnostic Reference Levels for Diagnostic and Interventional X-Ray Procedures in Germany: Update and Handling. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 739 - 751.