Accelerated sample preparation and formation of astragaloside IV in Astragali Radix.

Abstract Context: Astragali Radix (Huangqi; Astragalus mongholicus BUNGE, Fabaceae) is used in herbal medicinal products as well as in many food supplements. In traditional Chinese medicine, the roots are used for its Qi tonifying, immunostimulant, cardioprotective, hepatoprotective and hypoglycemic effects. Objective: Astragaloside IV (AGS-IV), a cycloartane-type triterpene glycoside is used as a marker compound for the quality control of Astragali Radix in various pharmacopoeias. Materials and methods: In this study, we analyzed the content of AGS-IV and other astragalosides in various commercial samples of Huangqi by reversed-phase HPLC using evaporative light scattering detection. Results: The analyses revealed that AGS-IV is formed during sample preparation from acylated astragalosides like astragaloside I and astragaloside II, when using the assay method of the European Pharmacopoeia. Discussion and conclusion: For consistent assay results, the extraction methods of the pharmacopoeias should be re-evaluated and optimized. Alternatively, the hydrolysis by ammonia could be omitted and the genuine compounds like astragaloside I, II and malonyl-AGS-I could be considered for the quality control of Astragali Radix.

Comparison of a specific HPLC determination of toxic aconite alkaloids in processed Radix aconiti with a titration method of total alkaloids.

CONTEXT: In traditional Chinese medicine, Aconitum (Ranunculaceae) roots are only applied after processing. Nevertheless, several cases of poisoning by improperly processed aconite roots have been reported. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a reliable analytical method to assess the amount of toxic aconite alkaloids in commercial aconite roots, and to compare this method with the commonly used total alkaloid content determination by titration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The content of mesaconitine, aconitine, and hypaconitine in 16 commercial samples of processed aconite roots was determined by an HPLC method and the total alkaloid content by indirect titration. Five samples were selected for in vivo toxicological investigation. RESULTS: In most of the commercial samples, toxic alkaloids were not detectable, or only traces were found. In four samples, we could detect >0.04% toxic aconite alkaloids, the highest with a content of 0.16%. The results of HPLC analysis were compared with the results obtained by titration, and no correlation was found between the two methods. The in vivo results reassured the validity of the HPLC determination. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Samples with mesaconitine, aconitine, and hypaconitine content below the HPLC detection limit still contained up to 0.2% alkaloids determined by titration. Since titration of alkaloids gives no information selectively on the aconitine-type alkaloid content and toxicity of aconite roots this method is not appropriate for safety assessment. The HPLC method developed by us provides a quick and reliable assessment of toxicity and should be considered as a purity test in pharmacopoeia monographs.