Conceptualisation, development and implementation of Interprofessional Education programmes: A qualitative document analysis.

Interprofessional Education (IPE) occurs when two or more health professionals learn with, from and about each other to improve collaboration within a healthcare team and represents a key step towards the realisation of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice (IPCP) which, in turn, enhances the healthcare outcomes of patients. Many health professions education institutions are taking on the challenge of developing IPE programmes and it is essential to provide evidence-based information to guide these institutions in their journey. We analysed the IPE programmes of six health professions education institutions from High-Income Countries and Low- and Middle-Income Countries according to the 12 steps of IPE programme introduction for health professions. This paper provides a step-by-step guide and 'to-do list' to help educators to conceptualise, develop, implement and review their IPE programmes. We recommend that institutions review and contextualise these findings and implement them in their IPE programmes from conception to final review.

Developing an interprofessional education programme for a health science faculty in South Africa: A multi-method study.

Objective: Work-ready graduates need to be equipped with expertise and therefore, critical changes are required in the curricula for health professions. Here, we aimed to review the design of an interprofessional education programme (IPE) with regards to appropriateness and implementation for the Faculty of Health Sciences at North-West University, South Africa. Methods: This study employed a sequential multi-method design to develop an IPE programme for a health science faculty in South Africa. A scoping review was conducted to synthesise the structure, development and implementation processes of IPE programmes globally. This was followed by an analysis of IPE programmes from institutions on five continents. Subsequently, the perspectives of international experts on the development and implementation of IPE programmes were explored in a qualitative study. This was followed by a university context analysis and the development of a draft IPE programme was designed based on the data synthesised from all preliminary studies. The programme was presented to faculty to evaluate and provide input by applying a nominal group technique. Results: For the scoping review, ten steps to the IPE programme development process were developed. For the qualitative document analysis, a step-by-step guide and to-do list were provided to guide educators in conceptualising, developing, implementing and reviewing their IPE programmes. For the qualitative exploratory descriptive design, four themes were identified after the analysis of transcripts. An optional 3-year IPE programme was developed to serve as a precursor for full credit integration of the IPE into the faculty of health science curricula during future development of the health science curricula. Conclusion: The optional 3-year IPE programme developed will serve as a precursor for the integration of a credit-bearing IPE programme into the Faculty of Health Sciences curricula during future development.

A Simulation-Based Clinical Nursing Education Framework for a Low-Resource Setting: A Multimethod Study.

Simulation-based clinical education is a useful strategy for teaching, learning, and assessing clinical competence in health professions education. However, the use of simulation-based clinical nursing education (SBCNE) in low-resource settings such as Ghana has been hampered by the lack of a context-specific framework to guide its design, implementation, and evaluation. This study sought to develop a context-specific framework to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of SBCNE in a low-resource setting. The study employed a sequential multimethod design, comprising a scoping review; qualitative descriptive design (situational analysis) made up of two parts-focus group discussions (FGDs) with post-registration nurses and nursing students, and semi-structured interviews with nurse educators; and narrative synthesis of the scoping review and situational analysis data, used to develop a draft SBCNE framework for a low-resource setting. The draft SBCNE framework was evaluated by stakeholders of nursing education and practice using nominal group discussions. The framework is comprised of five constructs (context, planning, design, community of learning, and outcomes). The user-centric, comprehensive, context-specific SBCNE framework has the potential to enhance the implementation of simulation in nursing education and the development of clinical competence in a low-resource setting. As a result, we urge nursing leaders and nurse educator unions to take the lead in lobbying regulatory bodies, the central government, and their development partners to provide the necessary financial support and resources for the implementation of the framework and adoption of SBCNE in low-resource settings.

Teaching and Learning of Clinical Competence in Ghana: Experiences of Students and Post-Registration Nurses.

Despite the growing demand for competent nurses to fill the shortage gap, nursing education institutions have not always been able to equip students with the requisite clinical competence needed in the practice setting. Several studies have described the experiences of undergraduate nursing students in the clinical learning environment. No study was found on the experiences of diploma nursing students and post-registration nurses regarding the teaching and learning of clinical competence in Ghana. This study, therefore, sought to describe the experiences and perceptions of diploma nursing students and post-registration nurses regarding the teaching and learning of clinical competence in Ghana. A qualitative descriptive research design was employed in this study. Fifty-five (55) participants, comprising 40 students and 15 post-registration diploma nurses, from six research sites were recruited into focus group discussions (FGDs) using a maximum variation purposive sampling technique. A thematic framework method was used to analyze the data with the aid of ATLAS.ti software. Three themes emerged from the focus group discussions: nursing education institutional factors; clinical placement design, implementation, and system challenges; challenges of clinical teaching and learning. We conclude that the current approach to clinical nursing education, such as the overreliance on clinical placement and the use of more teacher-centered teaching approaches, are ineffective in facilitating the development of clinical competence. A review of the nursing curriculum, inculcating evidence-based simulation modalities, and an adequate investment in nursing education may be required to ensure effective nursing education in the study setting.