Immunogenicity of a two-dose investigational hepatitis B vaccine, HBsAg-1018, using a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant compared with a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in adults.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus infection remains an important public health problem in the United States. Currently approved alum-adjuvanted vaccines require three doses and have reduced immunogenicity in adults, particularly in those who have diabetes mellitus, or are older, male, obese, or who smoke. METHODS: Phase 3 observer-blinded, randomized (2:1 HBsAg-1018 [HEPLISAV-B™]:HBsAg-Eng [Engerix-B®]), active-controlled trial in adults 18-70 years of age. HBsAg-1018 was administered intramuscularly at weeks 0 and 4 and placebo at week 24 and HBsAg-Eng at weeks 0, 4, and 24. The primary immunogenicity endpoint assessed the noninferiority of the seroprotection rate at week 28 in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Secondary endpoints included seroprotection rates in the total trial population and by age, sex, body mass index, and smoking status. RESULTS: Among 8374 participants randomized, 961 participants in the per-protocol population had type 2 diabetes mellitus. In diabetes participants, the seroprotection rate in the HBsAg-1018 group at week 28 was 90.0%, compared with 65.1% in the HBsAg-Eng group, with a difference of 24.9% (95% CI: 19.3%, 30.7%), which met the prospectively-defined criteria for noninferiority and statistical significance. In the total study per-protocol population (N = 6826) and each pre-specified subpopulation, the seroprotection rate in the HBsAg-1018 group was statistically significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. CONCLUSION: Two doses of HBsAg-1018, administered over 4 weeks, induced significantly higher seroprotection rates than three doses of HBsAg-Eng, given over 24 weeks, in adults with factors known to reduce the immune response to hepatitis B vaccines as well as in those without those factors. With fewer doses in a shorter time, and greater immunogenicity, HBsAg-1018 has the potential to significantly improve protection against hepatitis B in adults at risk for hepatitis B infection. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02117934.

Immunogenicity of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine with a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) compared with a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in subpopulations of healthy adults 18-70 years of age.

BACKGROUND: Immunologic response to a complete vaccine regimen of currently licensed alum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccines is reduced in several subpopulations, including older adults, men, obese persons, and smokers. Two phase 3 trials in healthy adults demonstrated that 2 doses over 1 month of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-1018) induced superior seroprotection rates (SPRs) to 3 doses over 6 months of the licensed vaccine Engerix-B (HBsAg-Eng). METHODS: An exploratory analysis of immunogenicity was conducted in subpopulations from pooled data for the 2 phase 3 trials. RESULTS: In each subpopulation, the peak SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group was statistically significantly higher than the peak SPR in the HBsAg-Eng group. Peak HBsAg-1018 SPRs ranged from 91.6% to 99.7%, while peak HBsAg-Eng SPRs ranged from 67.7% to 92.9%. CONCLUSION: In these exploratory analyses, 2 doses of HBsAg-1018 induced statistically significantly higher rates of seroprotection than 3 doses of HBsAg-Eng across all subpopulations.

Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine with a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) compared with a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are hyporesponsive to currently licensed alum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccines, including Engerix-B(®) (HBsAg-Eng). Seroprotection rates (SPRs) are further reduced in CKD patients with diabetes mellitus. Three doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-1018) that uses a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist demonstrated superior SPRs to 4 double doses of HBsAg-Eng in a large phase 3 trial of CKD patients. METHODS: A prespecified subgroup analysis of immunogenicity was conducted in CKD participants with type 2 diabetes in the phase 3 trial. RESULTS: In 328 participants, the peak SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group met criteria for noninferiority and superiority to the peak SPR in the HBsAg-Eng group. The peak geometric mean concentration of antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen in the HBsAg-1018 group was statistically significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. CONCLUSION: HBsAg-1018 induced significantly higher seroprotection than HBsAg-Eng in CKD patients with diabetes.

Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine with a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) compared to a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults 40-70 years of age.

BACKGROUND: The currently licensed hepatitis B vaccines have limitations including hyporesponsiveness in older adults, poor compliance, and the extended time for most persons to develop seroprotection (e.g. >6months). A vaccine containing HBsAg combined with a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) has been developed to overcome these limitations. METHODS: A Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, subject- and observer-blinded, active-controlled trial was conducted among healthy subjects 40-70years of age comparing the immunogenicity and safety of two doses of HBsAg-1018 at 0 and 4weeks to three doses of licensed hepatitis B vaccine, HBsAg-Eng, at 0, 4, and 24weeks. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was noninferiority of the seroprotection rate (SPR; % with anti-HBs≥10mIU/mL) of HBsAg-1018 compared to the SPR of HBsAg-Eng at 8 weeks following the last dose of vaccine. Conditional upon meeting noninferiority, superiority of HBsAg-1018 over HBsAg-Eng was assessed. Safety was compared between the two vaccines. RESULTS: At the primary endpoint, the SPR for the HBsAg-1018 group (90.0%) was superior to the SPR for the HBsAg-Eng group (70.5%) with an SPR difference of 19.5% (95% CI, 14.7%, 24.7%). At week 28 when the SPR peaked in the HBsAg-Eng group (72.8%), the SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group (94.8%) was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. The SPR in the HBsAg-1018 group was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group at each study visit from week 4 through week 52. The safety profiles for the two vaccines were similar. CONCLUSION: When compared to the HBsAg-Eng three-dose regimen given at 0, 1, and 6months, HBsAg-1018 demonstrated superior seroprotection with only two doses at 0 and 1month. The safety profile of HBsAg-1018 was comparable to that of the licensed vaccine, HBsAg-Eng. HBsAg-1018 would provide a significant public health contribution toward the prevention of hepatitis B infection.

Immunogenicity and safety of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine with a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant (HBsAg-1018) compared with a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are commonly hyporesponsive to HBV vaccines. Current recommendations for CKD patients are to utilize 4 double-doses (2×20 mcg HBsAg) of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-Eng). METHODS: An observer-blind, randomized, active-controlled, parallel group, multicenter trial was conducted among 521 patients 18-75 years of age with CKD, comparing 3 single doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (20 mcg rHBsAg+3000 mcg 1018, a toll-like receptor 9 agonist) given at 0, 4, and 24 weeks to 4 double-doses of HBsAg-Eng (2×20 mcg rHBsAg+500 mcg alum) given at 0, 4, 8, and 24 weeks (total of 8 injections). Participants were followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Among 467 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, at the primary endpoint at week 28, the seroprotection rate (SPR: % with anti-HBs≥10mIU/mL) in the HBsAg-1018 group (89.9%) met criteria for noninferiority and superiority to the SPR in the HBsAg-Eng group (81.8%). At week 28, the percentage of participants with anti-HBs≥100mIU/mL in the HBsAg-1018 group (73.6%) was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group (63.2%). In addition, the geometric mean concentration of anti-HBs in the HBsAg-1018 group (587.1mIU/mL) was significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group (156.5mIU/mL). At weeks 8 and 12 after the first study injection, SPRs in the HBsAg-1018 group were significantly higher than in the HBsAg-Eng group. At 52 weeks, the immune response to HBsAg-1018 remained higher than to HBsAg-Eng. HBsAg-1018 was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety profile to HBsAg-Eng. CONCLUSION: In CKD patients, 3 doses of HBsAg-1018 induced significantly higher seroprotection, earlier seroprotection, and more durable seroprotection than 4 double doses of HBsAg-Eng.

Immunogenicity of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (hepatitis B surface antigen co-administered with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide) in nonresponders to licensed hepatitis B vaccine.

An additional one to three doses of hepatitis B vaccine are recommended for nonresponders to an initial standard three-dose series. We compared the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational hepatitis B surface antigen vaccine (HBsAg-1018) with a phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide adjuvant that targets toll-like receptor-9 to a commercially available, alum-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine (HBsAg-Eng) in nonresponders to three previous doses (primary study) or to four to six previous doses (substudy) of HBsAg-Eng. Both vaccines were well tolerated, although HBsAg-1018 was associated with more injection-site tenderness (63.2% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.016 in the primary study and 81.8% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.003 in the substudy). No statistically significant differences in rates of seroprotection (anti-HBs concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL) or geometric mean antibody concentrations were found in the primary study. In the substudy, a greater proportion of HBsAg-1018 recipients achieved an anti-HBs concentration ≥ 100 mIU/mL (54.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.027), and those responders had higher geometric mean antibody concentrations at 4 weeks (264 vs. 46.5 mIU/mL, p = 0.021) and 52 weeks (7.0 vs. 1.2 mIU/mL, p = 0.030) than HBsAg-Eng recipients. Although this study suggests that HBsAg-1018 may have improved immunogenicity in nonresponders to hepatitis B vaccine vaccination when compared with HBsAg-Eng, larger studies are required.

Safety and immunogenicity of different two-dose regimens of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine (hepatitis B surface antigen co-administered with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide) in healthy young adults.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that two doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine consisting of hepatitis B surface antigen combined with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide adjuvant (HBV-ISS) given 8 weeks apart provides seroprotection sooner than 3 doses of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine over 24 weeks. A more rapid schedule with a 4-week interval could provide earlier protection and potentially greater compliance. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, healthy adults received two doses of HBV-ISS at 0 and 4 or 0 and 8 weeks; saline placebo was given at week 8 for the 0-4 schedule and at week 4 for the 0-8 schedule). Adverse events were collected after each dose. Antibodies were measured at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 32 weeks. RESULTS: Participants were randomized to the 0-4 (n=18) or 0-8 (n=23) weeks schedule. Rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups after the HBV-ISS injections regardless of the schedule, but more frequent than after the placebo injections. By 4 weeks post-dose-2, 94.1% of 0-4 and 100% of 0-8 recipients had protective antibody levels; geometric mean concentrations were 244 mIU/mL and 3217 mIU/mL respectively. By 32 weeks, the difference in antibody concentration had decreased (GMC 439 mIU/mL vs. 863 mIU/mL, respectively; p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A 0-4 weeks, two-dose regimen of HBV-ISS was well-tolerated and induced an antibody response that was similar to a 0-8 weeks schedule.

Demonstration of safety and enhanced seroprotection against hepatitis B with investigational HBsAg-1018 ISS vaccine compared to a licensed hepatitis B vaccine.

Adults 40 years of age and older have been shown to be hypo-responsive immunologically to the currently available hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccines. Three intramuscular doses of a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, 1018 immunostimulatory sequence (1018 ISS) adjuvant, combined with recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) demonstrated faster, superior, and more durable seroprotection than three doses of a licensed comparator HBV vaccine (Engerix-B(®)). This investigational vaccine, HBsAg-1018 ISS, was well tolerated with a safety profile similar to the comparator vaccine. These results suggest that HBsAg-1018 may be more effective in this hypo-responsive population.

Comparison of safety and immunogenicity of two doses of investigational hepatitis B virus surface antigen co-administered with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide and three doses of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in healthy adults 18-55 years of age.

BACKGROUND: The currently licensed aluminum-hydroxide-adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccines require three doses over a 6-month period to achieve high rates of protection in adults. We compared tolerability and immunogenicity of two doses of an investigational hepatitis B vaccine using hepatitis B surface antigen adjuvanted with an immunostimulatory phosphorothioate oligodeoxyribonucleotide (HBV-ISS) to three doses of a licensed alum-adjuvanted vaccine (HBV-Eng). METHODS: In this randomized, observer-blind study, healthy adults received two doses of HBV-ISS at 0 and 4 weeks or three doses of HBV-Eng at 0, 4, and 24 weeks. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was the seroprotection rate (antibody ≥ 10 mIU/mL) 8 weeks after the second dose of HBV-ISS compared to 4 weeks after the third dose of HBV-Eng. RESULTS: A total of 2415 participants were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to HBV-ISS (n=1809) and HBV-Eng (n=606). The percentage of subjects exhibiting a seroprotective immune response at the primary time point was significantly higher (95.1%) for HBV-ISS than for HBV-Eng (81.1%). Superiority of the seroprotective rates for HBV-ISS was demonstrated at all time points measured. Geometric mean concentrations were also significantly higher in the HBV-ISS group at all time points measured except at week 28 (24 weeks post-second dose of HBV-ISS and 4 weeks post-third dose HBV-ISS) at which time the antibody concentrations were similar. Both vaccines were welltolerated although injection-site reactions were reported at a higher rate in HBV-ISS recipients. CONCLUSIONS: A short, two-dose regimen of HBV-ISS induced a superior antibody response than a three-dose regimen of a licensed hepatitis B vaccine and was well tolerated.

HIV-1 virologic and immunologic progression and initiation of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-1-infected subjects in a trial of the efficacy of recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine.

The first trial of the efficacy of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 vaccine was conducted in North America and The Netherlands between 1998 and 2003. This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine included 5403 initially HIV-negative volunteers who were monitored for 3 years. The 368 subjects who acquired HIV-1 infection were monitored for 2 years by use of the following postinfection end points: plasma HIV-1 RNA level (viral load), CD4+ lymphocyte count, initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), and HIV-1-related clinical outcomes. This article reports the study results that pertain to the effect of vaccination on the postinfection end points. The time until initiation of ART and the time until virologic failure or initiation of ART were similar in the vaccine arm and the placebo arm. The pre-ART viral load and CD4+ lymphocyte count trajectories were also comparable between the groups. Evidently, the vaccine did not affect HIV-1 disease progression.

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxic responses in participants enrolled in a phase I/II ALVAC-HIV/AIDSVAX B/E prime-boost HIV-1 vaccine trial in Thailand.

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) was assessed in volunteers participating in an ALVAC-HIV (vCP1521)/AIDSVAX B/E gp120 prime-boost vaccine trial in Thailand. ADCC activity was measured using chromium release from gp120 subtype B- and CRF01_AE-coated targets in 95 vaccinees and 28 placebo recipients. There was a significant difference in the magnitude of the ADCC response to both targets between vaccinees and placebo recipients. The frequency of responders to subtype B and to CRF01_AE was 96% and 84% in the vaccine group versus 11% and 7% in the placebo group. The results demonstrate that this HIV vaccine is a potent inducer of ADCC activity and may be an additional protection of this prime-boost vaccine in preventing HIV disease.

Correlation between immunologic responses to a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine and incidence of HIV-1 infection in a phase 3 HIV-1 preventive vaccine trial.

BACKGROUND: An objective of the first efficacy trial of a candidate vaccine containing recombinant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 envelope glycoprotein 120 (rgp120) antigens was to assess correlations between antibody responses to rgp120 and the incidence of HIV-1 infection. METHODS: Within the randomized trial (for vaccinees, n=3598; for placebo recipients, n=1805), binding and neutralizing antibody responses to rgp120 were quantitated. A case-cohort design was used to study correlations between antibody levels and HIV-1 incidence. RESULTS: Peak antibody levels were significantly inversely correlated with HIV-1 incidence. The relative risk (RR) of infection was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.89) per log(10) higher neutralization titer against HIV-1(MN), and the RRs of infection for second-, third-, and fourth-quartile responses of antibody blocking of gp120 binding to soluble CD4 versus first-quartile responses (the lowest responses) were 0.35, 0.28, and 0.22, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite inducing a complex, robust immune response, the vaccine was unable to reduce the incidence of HIV-1. Two interpretations of the correlative results are that the levels of antibodies (i) caused both an increased (low responders) and decreased (high responders) risk of HIV-1 acquisition or (ii) represented a correlate of susceptibility to HIV-1 but had no causal effect on susceptibility. Although the data cannot definitively discriminate between these 2 explanations, (ii) appears to be more likely.

Phase I/II study of a candidate vaccine designed against the B and E subtypes of HIV-1.

A phase I/II trial of a candidate vaccine to prevent HIV infection was carried out in Bangkok, Thailand, testing AIDSVAX B/E (VaxGen, Inc., Brisbane, CA), a bivalent subunit vaccine prepared by combining recombinant gp120 from a subtype B virus (HIV-1MN) with gp120 from a subtype E virus (HIV-1A244) in alum adjuvant. The studies provide human data on the immunogenicity of various dose combination of non-subtype B vaccine antigens. The results suggest that AIDSVAX B/E is safe and immunogenic in humans. The optimal dose for humans in developing countries was 300 microg of each antigen (B and E). Clade E responses were measurably increased by immunizing with gp120 B/E over B alone. Using the B/E combination did not interfere with the response to either clade. Antibodies to AIDSVAX B/E were able to bind to oligomeric gp120 on the surface of cells infected with primary isolates of HIV-1.

Recruitment, screening and characteristics of injection drug users participating in the AIDSVAX B/E HIV vaccine trial, Bangkok, Thailand.

OBJECTIVES: To describe recruitment, screening and baseline characteristics of injection drug users (IDU) participating in a phase III HIV vaccine (AIDSVAX B/E; VaxGen, USA) trial and to compare enrollment characteristics between trial participants and 1209 IDU from a 1995-1998 vaccine trial preparatory cohort for changes that might impact trial design assumptions. METHODS: Enrollment for both studies was conducted at Bangkok narcotic treatment clinics, where a standardized questionnaire was administered on demographics, risk behavior and incarceration history over the previous 6 months. RESULTS: During 1999-2000, 4943 IDU were screened for enrollment; successful sources of recruitment included clinic attendees (43.4%), an IDU referral program (20.4%) and preparatory cohort participants (14.7%). Of those screened, 1689 (34%) were HIV seropositive (HIV subtype B 23.6%; subtype E 76.4%). Of the 2545 enrolled, 93.4% were male. Compared with cohort IDU, trial IDU were younger (mean age: 28.8 versus 31.3 years), better educated (secondary level or higher: 67.2% versus 58.7%), and less likely to inject drugs daily (39.4% versus 90.4%); they were more likely to have been incarcerated (78.4% versus 65.7%), have recently injected stimulants (14.8% versus 5.8%) and tranquilizers (11.5% versus 2.3%), and obtained needles/syringes from a source other than a pharmacist (7.2% versus 3.9%) (all P < or = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: IDU at high risk for HIV have been successfully enrolled in the AIDSVAX B/E efficacy trial. Only minor epidemiologic differences were found at enrollment between trial and preparatory cohort IDU. The latter has proven critical in guiding trial design; results are expected in late 2003.

Incarceration and risk for HIV infection among injection drug users in Bangkok.

OBJECTIVE: To assess potential multiple relationships between incarceration and HIV infection among injecting drug users (IDUs) in Bangkok. Previous cross-sectional studies have shown strong relationships between incarceration and HIV infection but have not been able to assess potential causal pathways. METHODS: Injection drug users seen at methadone treatment programs in Bangkok were screened during 1995 to 1996 for enrollment into the study. With informed consent, 1,209 seronegative IDUs were enrolled in a cohort study to determine HIV incidence and identify factors associated with incident infections. Follow-up visits were conducted every 4 months, with HIV testing and assessment of risk behaviors. RESULTS: Overall incidence rate was 5.8 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-6.8) of follow-up. A four-step "injection risk" scale was constructed that included less frequent than daily injection, daily injection, daily injection with reported sharing of injection equipment, and injection while incarcerated. This scale was strongly related to HIV incidence, with incidence approximately doubling for each step in the scale. Incidence rate for follow-up periods that contained drug injection while incarcerated was 35/100 person-years at risk. In multivariate analyses, incarceration was related to incident HIV infection in multiple ways: previous incarceration and recent incarceration without drug injection, and the injection risk scale were all independently predictors of incident HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: Incarceration is related to incident HIV infection through multiple pathways. Previous incarcerations are likely to serve as markers for unmeasured high-risk behaviors, and it is also highly likely that HIV is transmitted during periods of incarceration. Programs to reduce HIV transmission in jails and prisons, including drug abuse treatment of inmates and programs to reduce the likelihood of incarceration of IDUs, are needed urgently. Given the current diffusion of injecting drug use, of HIV infection among drug injectors, and of the common policy of incarcerating drug users, it is very likely that the problem of HIV transmission in jails and prisons is increasing in many countries throughout the world.