Comparison of the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo).

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo). METHODS: MoCo PET/DCE-MRI of the upper abdomen was acquired in 44 consecutive oncologic patients and compared with non-MoCo PET/MRI. SUVmax and MTV of FDG-avid upper abdominal malignant lesions were assessed on MoCo and non-MoCo PET images. Image quality was compared between MoCo DCE-MRI and non-MoCo CE-MRI, and between fused MoCo PET/MRI and fused non-MoCo PET/MRI images. RESULTS: MoCo PET resulted in higher SUVmax (10.8 ± 5.45) than non-MoCo PET (9.62 ± 5.42) and lower MTV (35.55 ± 141.95 cm3) than non-MoCo PET (38.11 ± 198.14 cm3; p < 0.005 for both). The quality of MoCo DCE-MRI images (4.73 ± 0.5) was higher than that of non-MoCo CE-MRI images (4.53±0.71; p = 0.037). The quality of fused MoCo-PET/MRI images (4.96 ± 0.16) was higher than that of fused non-MoCo PET/MRI images (4.39 ± 0.66; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: MoCo PET/MRI provided qualitatively better images than non-MoCo PET/MRI, and upper abdominal malignant lesions demonstrated higher SUVmax and lower MTV on MoCo PET/MRI.

Effects of deviation from focal plane on lesion geometry for ablative fractional photothermolysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fractional Photothermolysis (FP) is a method of skin treatment that generates a thermal damage pattern consisting of multiple columns of thermal damage, also known as microscopic treatment zones (MTZs). They are very small in diameter and are generated by application of highly focused laser beams. In order to obtain the smallest spot size, the treatment should be performed in the focal plane. Any deviation from the focal plane (DFP) results in an increase of spot size. FP devices typically utilize distance holders in order to facilitate exposures at this specific location. In spite of the use of distance holders, DFP can occur. In particular, variations of contact pressure to the skin surface and anatomical treatment areas of high surface curvature may be prone to DFP during FP treatments. The impact of such distance variation on lesion geometry, such as depth and diameter of the thermal injury, has not previously been evaluated. The objective of this study was to investigate the relation between DFP and the resulting lesion geometry for a selected ablative fractional device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A handpiece of an ablative fractional laser (DeepFX, UltraPulse Encore, Lumenis, Yokneam, Israel) was mounted to a rigid stand. Full thickness human skin obtained from abdominoplasty was mounted to a separate stand perpendicular to the handpiece. The tissue stand allowed the distance between the handpiece and the tissue to be adjusted to produce a variation up to ±3 mm from the focal plane. A 1 × 1 cm(2) scanning area of 169 MTZs, 50 mJ energy per MTZ, 120 µm nominal spot size, was applied at -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, and +3 mm deviated from the focal plane. Minus (-) and plus (+) signs indicate decreasing and increasing distance between the handpiece and the tissue, respectively. Depth and diameter of the laser induced tissue lesions were assessed and quantified. RESULTS: DFPs produced a significant alteration of the lesion geometry. DFPs of -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3 mm resulted in average lesion depths of 1,020 (-40%), 1,180 (-31%), 1,400 (-18%), 1,700 (0%), 1,620 (-5%), 780 (-55%), 680 (-60%) µm, and average lesion diameters of 314 (+26%), 311 (+25%), 273 (+10%), 248 (0%), 256 (+3%), 316 (+27%), 359 (+44%) µm, respectively. The underlined values represent the focal plane. The percentage changes relative to values at focal plane are in parentheses. CONCLUSIONS: A relatively minor DFP has a marked impact on the thermal injury profile, including lesion depth and diameter, of the laser-exposed tissue. Such marked changes of the thermal injury profile might affect the wound healing, safety, and efficacy of ablative fractional resurfacing procedures. Clinicians should carefully maintain the focal plane during ablative fractional treatment for reproducible results. The presented data are device specific and the clinical impact of such alteration of thermal injury profile warrants further investigation. Lasers Surg. Med. 48:555-561, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.