Operative management of lateral third clavicle fractures: a comparison of internal fixation methods.

PURPOSE: Clavicle fractures in the lateral third are associated with more complications. Various methods of internal fixation exist; however, there is no consensus which should be employed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of these various methods in our regional trauma unit. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent internal fixation of a lateral clavicle fracture in our unit between 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2019. Demographic and outcome data were extracted from electronic care records and imaging systems. RESULTS: In total, 44 patients were included, with the following demographics: mean age 26 years, 63.6% male, 65.9% high-energy injury, 68.2% Neer II fracture. The following operations were performed: hook plate fixation (HPF) = 10, locking plate fixation (LPF) = 16, coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR) = 12, and LPF + CCLR = 6. Patients having LPF had a significantly larger post-operative coracoclavicular distance (7.6 mm vs 13.5 mm, p < 0.01), and trends towards a lesser decrease in CCD (9.9 mm vs 12.6 mm, p = 0.37) and incomplete ACJ reduction (50.0% vs 89.3%, p = 0.11). There was a significantly higher re-operation rate after HPF (100% vs 23.5%, p < 0.01). There were no differences in time to union or duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In our unit there is no clearly favoured method of internal fixation of lateral clavicle fractures. When LPF is used, there should be consideration of concomitant CCLR. The high rate of re-operation after HPF is concordant with previous research.

A novel and dedicated multidisciplinary service to manage breech presentation at term; 3 years of experience in a tertiary care maternity unit.

OBJECTIVE: In order to provide uniform and unbiased multidisciplinary counselling on the options available, including vaginal breech delivery (VBD) and external cephalic version (ECV), the latter of which could then be performed, a weekly Breech Clinic was introduced to a tertiary care maternity unit in Northern Ireland in June 2013, replacing the traditional ECV Clinic introduced in June 2012. METHODS: Retrospective data collection was undertaken using clinic proformas, Northern Ireland Maternity System data and case notes of women who attended the clinics (ECV and Breech) from June 2012 to May 2015. RESULTS: There were 434 referrals to the clinic over the 3-year period; 356 women attended. The proportion of women attending increased from 69% to 85% since the introduction of the Breech Clinic. Two hundred and thirty-two were deemed eligible and 179 of these underwent ECV after counselling. Although the proportion of women undergoing ECV decreased from 69% to 46%, 11 women opted for and achieved VBD during the 2 years of the Breech Clinic, compared with one woman in the year of the ECV Clinic. Seventy-one of the attempted ECVs were successful, with 61 women having a normal vaginal delivery. Notably, the success rate of ECV increased from 33% to 42%. The number of caesarean sections performed solely for breech at term decreased from 199 in the 12 months before the introduction of ECV clinic, to 188 during the ECV clinic, and 154 in the final 12 months of Breech Clinic. CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated service to counsel women on the management of breech presentation can decrease caesarean sections for breech presentation through increased uptake and success of ECV, and encouraging suitable women to opt for VBD when ECV is unsuccessful, contraindicated or declined.