Micro-RNAS Regulate Metabolic Syndrome-induced Senescence in Porcine Adipose Tissue-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells through the P16/MAPK Pathway.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) constitute an important repair system, but may be impaired by exposure to cardiovascular risk factors. Consequently, adipose tissue-derived MSCs from pigs with the metabolic syndrome (MetS) show decreased vitality. A growing number of microRNAs (miRNAs) are recognized as key modulators of senescence, but their role in regulating senescence in MSC in MetS is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that MetS upregulates in MSC expression of miRNAs that can serve as post-transcriptional regulators of senescence-associated (SA) genes. MSCs were collected from swine abdominal adipose tissue after 16 weeks of Lean or Obese diet ( n = 6 each). Next-generation miRNA sequencing (miRNA-seq) was performed to identify miRNAs up-or down-regulated in MetS-MSCs compared with Lean-MSCs. Functional pathways of SA genes targeted by miRNAs were analyzed using gene ontology. MSC senescence was evaluated by p16 and p21 immunoreactivity, H2AX protein expression, and SA-ß-Galactosidase activity. In addition, gene expression of p16, p21, MAPK3 (ERK1) and MAPK14, and MSC migration were studied after inhibition of SA-miR-27b. Senescence biomarkers were significantly elevated in MetS-MSCs. We found seven upregulated miRNAs, including miR-27b, and three downregulated miRNAs in MetS-MSCs, which regulate 35 SA genes, particularly MAPK signaling. Inhibition of miR-27b in cultured MSCs downregulated p16 and MARP3 genes, and increased MSC migration. MetS modulates MSC expression of SA-miRNAs that may regulate their senescence, and the p16 pathway seems to play an important role in MetS-induced MSC senescence.

Patient survival after kidney transplantation: relationship to pretransplant cardiac troponin T levels.

Assessing cardiovascular (CV) risk pretransplant is imprecise. We sought to determine whether cardiac troponin T (cTnT) relates to patient survival posttransplant. The study includes 603 adults, recipients of kidney transplants. In addition to cTnT dobutamine stress echography and coronary angiography were done in 45% and 19% of the candidates respectively. During 28.4 +/- 12.9 months 5.6% of patients died or had a major cardiac event. cTnT levels were elevated (>0.01 ng/ml) in 56.2% of patients. Elevated cTnT related to reduced event-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.81, CI 1.33-2.45, p < 0.0001) whether those events occurred during the first year or beyond. This relationship was statistically independent of all other variables tested, including older age, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and delayed graft function. cTnT levels allowed better definition of risk in patients with other CV risk factors. Thus, event-free survival was excellent in older individuals, patients with diabetes, low EF and those with preexisting heart disease if their cTnT levels were normal. However, elevated cTnT together with another CV risk factor(s) identified patient with very poor survival posttransplant. Pretransplant cTnT levels are strong and independent predictors of posttransplant survival. These results suggest that cTnT is quite helpful in CV risk stratification of kidney transplant recipients.

Survival of patients on the kidney transplant wait list: relationship to cardiac troponin T.

Patients waiting for a kidney transplant have high mortality despite careful preselection. Herein, we assessed whether cardiac troponin T (cTnT) can help stratify risk in patients selected for kidney transplantation. cTnT levels were measured in all kidney transplant candidates but the results were not used for patient selection. Among 644 patients placed on the kidney waiting list from 9/2004 to 12/2006, 61% had elevated cTnT levels (>0.01 ng/mL). Higher levels related to diabetes, longer time on dialysis, history of cardiovascular disease and low serum albumin. High cTnT also related to cardiac anomalies, including left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), wall motion abnormalities and stress-inducible ischemia by dobutamine echo (DSE). However, 54% of patients without these cardiac findings had elevated cTnT. Increasing cTnT levels were associated with reduced survival (HR = 1.729, CI (1.25-2.39), p = 0.01) independently of low serum albumin (0.449 (0.24-0.83), p = 0.011) and history of stroke (3.368 (1.47-7.73), p = 0.0004). The results of the DSE and/or coronary angiography did not relate significantly to survival. However, high cTnT identified patients with abnormal echo findings and poor survival. Wait listed patients with normal cTnT have excellent survival irrespective of other factors. In contrast, high cTnT levels are strongly predictive of poor survival in the kidney transplant waiting list.

Patient survival and cardiovascular risk after kidney transplantation: the challenge of diabetes.

An increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Herein, we assessed the impact of DM on morbidity and mortality. The study included 933 recipients of first transplants. DM was present in 212 (23%). Compared to non-diabetics (NoDM), DM were older, heavier and had more pretransplant cardiovascular (CV) disease (16% vs. 48%, p < 0.0001). DM had reduced survival (5 years, 93% vs. 70%, p < 0.0001) and higher incidence of CV events (9% vs. 37%, p < 0.0001). CV disease was the most common cause of death in DM (61%) but not in NoDM (26%). Mortality from infections was also higher in DM (p = 0.001). In NoDM, survival related to recipient age (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.07, p < 0.0001) and dialysis pretransplant HR = 2.21, p = 0.01, while in DM, survival related to dialysis (HR = 2.89, p = 0.01) and pretransplant CV disease (HR = 2.79, p = 0.007). In NoDM, the incidence of posttransplant CV events was related to traditional CV risk factors, while in DM only the pretransplant CV history related to this outcome. In conclusion, survival differs between NoDM and DM recipients quantitatively, by cause of death and by risk factors. In NoDM, survival is excellent, and the main threat to survival relates to immunosuppression. In DM, survival is inferior primarily due to CV disease generally present prior to transplantation.