Mind the gap: knowledge, attitudes and perceptions on antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention and control in long-term care facilities for people with disabilities in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has become one of the major public health threats worldwide, emphasizing the necessity of preventing the development and transmission of drug resistant microorganisms. This is particularly important for people with vulnerable health conditions, such as people with intellectual disabilities (ID) and long-term care residents. This study aimed to assess the current status of AMR, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) in Dutch long-term care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities (ID-LTCFs). METHODS: A web-based cross-sectional survey distributed between July and November 2023, targeting (both nonmedically and medically trained) healthcare professionals working in ID-LTCFs in The Netherlands, to study knowledge, attitudes and perceptions regarding AMR, AMS and IPC. RESULTS: In total, 109 participants working in 37 long-term care organizations for people with intellectual disabilities throughout the Netherlands completed the questionnaire. The knowledge levels of AMR and IPC among nonmedically trained professionals (e.g., social care professionals) were lower than those among medically trained professionals (p = 0.026). In particular regarding the perceived protective value of glove use, insufficient knowledge levels were found. Furthermore, there was a lack of easy-read resources and useful information regarding IPC and AMR, for both healthcare professionals as well as people with disabilities. The majority of the participants (> 90%) reported that AMR and IPC need more attention within the disability care sector, but paradoxically, only 38.5% mentioned that they would like to receive additional information and training about IPC, and 72.5% would like to receive additional information and training about AMR. CONCLUSION: Although the importance of AMR and IPC is acknowledged by professionals working in ID-LTCFs, there is room for improvement in regards to appropriate glove use and setting-specific IPC and hygiene policies. As nonmedically trained professionals comprise most of the workforce within ID-LTCFs, it is also important to evaluate their needs. This can have a substantial impact on developing and implementing AMR, AMS and/or IPC guidelines and policies in ID-LTCFs.

Sensitivity of C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Measured by Point-of-Care Tests to Diagnose Urinary Tract Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) in nursing home residents is complex, as specific urinary symptoms are often absent and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is prevalent. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity of blood C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), measured by point-of-care tests (PoCTs), to diagnose UTIs in this setting. METHODS: Elderly residents (≥65 years old) with a suspected UTI were recruited from psychogeriatric, somatic, or rehabilitation wards across 13 participating nursing homes. CRP and PCT were tested simultaneously in the same study participants. To assess the tests' sensitivities, a stringent definition of "true" UTI was used that included the presence of symptoms, urinary leucocytes, a positive urine culture, and symptom resolution during antibiotic treatment covering isolated uropathogen(s). The original sample size was 440 suspected UTI episodes, in order to detect a clinically relevant sensitivity of at least 65% when calculated using the matched analysis approach to compare both PoCTs. RESULTS: After enrollment of 302 episodes (68.6% of the planned sample size), an unplanned and funder-mandated interim analysis was done, resulting in premature discontinuation of the study for futility. For 247 of 266 eligible episodes, all mandatory items required for the true UTI definition (92.9%) were available. In total, 49 episodes fulfilled our stringent UTI definition (19.8%). The sensitivities of CRP (cut-off, 6.5 mg/L) and PCT (cut-off, 0.025 ng/mL) were 52.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.7-67.5%) and 37.0% (95% CI, 23.2-52.5%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that CRP and PCT are not suitable tests for distinguishing UTI and ASB in nursing home residents. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registry NL6293.