Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Psychogeriatr ; 29(5): 859-862, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124634

RESUMO

Behavioral disturbances are common but serious symptoms in patients with dementia. Currently, there are no FDA approved drugs for this purpose. There have been case reports and small case series of the use of buspirone. In this retrospective study, we review 179 patients prescribed buspirone for treatment of behavioral disturbance in dementia to better characterize the efficacy and potential side effects. All patients prescribed buspirone for behavioral disturbance due to dementia from a geropsychiatric outreach program were reviewed. Data was collected and analyzed using SPSS. One hundred-seventy-nine patients met criteria for the study with a mean age of 83.8 + 7. Alzheimer's dementia was the most common dementia (n = 61; 34.1%) followed by mixed dementia (n = 50, 27.9%) then vascular type (n = 31; 17.3%). Behavioral disturbances were mainly verbal aggression (n = 125; 69.8%), and physical aggression (n = 116; 64.8%). Using the Clinical Global Impression scale, 68.6% of patients responded to buspirone, with 41.8% being moderately to markedly improved. The mean dose of buspirone was 25.7 mg ± 12.50. Buspirone appears to be effective in treating behavioral disturbances in dementia. Future prospective and double blinded studies are needed.


Assuntos
Agressão/efeitos dos fármacos , Buspirona/uso terapêutico , Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas do Receptor de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Virginia
2.
J Atten Disord ; 20(3): 260-9, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23400213

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study compared video recordings from routine driving of ADHD and non-ADHD young adults to identify differences in driving behaviors. METHOD: A matched sample of young adult drivers with and without ADHD are compared via blinded ratings of videoed g-force events recorded by DriveCam technology over 3 months of on-road driving. RESULTS: ADHD drivers were significantly more likely to have more crashes, minor events, and g-force events. G-force events for the ADHD drivers involved significantly more risky and illegal, hyperactive/impulsive, and distracted behaviors. The g-force events of non-ADHD drivers were due to evasive, defensive driving or lapses in attention. CONCLUSION: Increased risk for ADHD drivers may be the result of increased risk taking, increased hyperactivity/impulsivity or distraction behavior, and increased vulnerability to factors that interfere with driving in general, whereas the consequences of faulty driving were either higher or potentially higher in those drivers with ADHD.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/psicologia , Atenção , Condução de Veículo , Comportamento Impulsivo , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Hipercinese/psicologia , Masculino , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Adulto Jovem
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24940523

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of a prescription monitoring program in identifying prescription drug misuse among patients presenting to a resident physician outpatient psychiatry clinic at an academic medical center. METHOD: Participants were 314 new patients aged 18 years or older presenting to the clinic from October 2011 to June 2012. Resident physicians completed a data collection form for each participant using information from the patient interview and from the prescription monitoring program report. Prescription drug misuse was defined as having any 1 of the following 5 criteria in the prescription monitoring program report: (1) filled prescriptions for 2 or more controlled substances, (2) obtained prescriptions from 2 or more providers, (3) obtained early refills, (4) used 3 or more pharmacies, and (5) the prescription monitoring program report conflicted with the patient's report. RESULTS: At least 1 indicator of prescription drug misuse was found in 41.7% of patients. Over 69% of the patients that the residents believed were misusing prescription drugs actually met 1 of the criteria for prescription drug misuse. The prescription monitoring program report changed the management only 2.2% of the time. Patients with prior benzodiazepine use (χ(2) 1 = 17.68, P < .001), prior opioid use (χ(2) 1 = 19.98, P < .001), a personality disorder (χ(2) 1 = 7.22, P < .001), and chronic pain (χ(2) 1 = 14.31, P < .001) had a higher percentage of prescription drug misuse compared to patients without these factors. CONCLUSION: Using the prescription monitoring program to screen patients with prior benzodiazepine and opioid use, with a personality disorder, and/or with chronic pain may be useful in confirming the suspicion of prescription drug misuse identified at the initial evaluation.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...