RESUMO
This study aimed to report our experience with the use of sirolimus in pediatric liver transplant patients with chronic rejection or steroid-resistant rejection with hepatic fibrosis, focusing on their histological evolution. All pediatric liver transplant recipients who received off-label treatment with sirolimus for chronic ductopenic rejection or cortico-resistant rejection between July 2003 and July 2022 were included in the study. All nine patients included in the study showed improvement in liver enzymes and cholestasis parameters as soon as 1-month after postsirolimus introduction. A decrease in fibrosis stage was observed in 7/9 (77.7%) patients at 36 months. All but one patient experienced an improvement in the Rejection Activity Index and ductopenia at 12 months. A single patient had to discontinue sirolimus treatment owing to nephrotic proteinuria. In conclusion, sirolimus may be a safe and effective treatment for chronic and steroid-resistant rejection and may improve allograft rejection-related fibrosis and ductal damage.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are the most common de novo malignancies after liver transplantation (LT) in children. The aim of our study was to assess the role of pre-LT EBV status and post-LT EBV viral load as risk factors for developing PTLD in a cohort of pediatric LT recipients. METHODS: Data of all children who underwent LT between January 2002 and December 2019 were collected. Two cohorts were built EBV pre-LT primary infected cohort and EBV post-LT primary infected cohort. Moreover, using the maximal EBV viral load, a ROC curve was constructed to find a cutoff point for the diagnosis of PTLD. RESULTS: Among the 251 patients included in the study, fifteen PTLD episodes in 14 LT recipients were detected (2 plasmacytic hyperplasia, 10 polymorphic PTLD, 2 monomorphic PTLD, and 1 Classical-Hodgkin's lymphoma). Patients of the EBV post-LT primary infected cohort were 17.1 times more likely to develop a PTLD than patients of the EBV pre-LT primary infected cohort (2.2-133.5). The EBV viral load value to predict PTLD was set at 211 000 UI/mL (93.3% sensitivity and 77.1% specificity; AUC 93.8%; IC 0.89-0.98). In EBV post-LT primary infected cohort, patients with a viral load above 211 000 were 30 times more likely to develop PTLD than patients with a viral load below this value (OR 29.8; 3.7-241.1; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of pretransplant EBV serological status with EBV post-transplant viral load could be a powerful tool to stratify the risk of PTLD in pediatric LT patients.
