Patient reported experience and adherence to remote patient management in chronic heart failure patients: a posthoc analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial.

AIMS: Remote patient management (RPM) enables early detection and prevention of deterioration in heart failure (HF) patients by measuring vital parameters. The analysis objective is to assess patient reported experience with RPM, adherence to daily measurements, and outline affecting factors both. METHODS AND RESULTS: Telemedical interventional management in-HF2 was conducted in 2013-18 with 1 538 HF patients with a 12-month follow-up. Under guidance of HF nurses, patients had to measure daily weight, blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and self-rated health status. At the end of the study, patients received a programme survey to analyse patient perceptions and satisfaction with telemedicine care and study organization. Adherence was distinguished between measurement of at least one [incomplete adherence (IA)] and all vital parameters [complete adherence (CA)] and defined as ratio of the number of days of measurements taken divided by the number of days of possible measurements. All data and group differences were analysed descriptively (mean ± SD) and by analysis of variance and t-test. Survey response rate was 79.7%. Patients were satisfied with the programme and device usability. CA was 89.1 ± 14.1%, consistently high over the study course and independent of severity of disease (left ventricular ejection fraction, N terminals pro brain natriuretic peptide, New York Heart Association). Lower IA was found with patients <70 years and prior to unplanned cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations (difference by -5.2 ± 20.5%) and after unplanned CV hospitalizations compared with the entire study period (lower by -12.8 ± 24.7%). Patients from rural areas were found to have higher CA than patients from urban regions. CONCLUSIONS: With user-friendly devices, pre-interventional patient training, regular patient contact and close cooperation between primary physicians and telemedical centre, a long-lasting high adherence and satisfaction could be achieved. A change in adherence might detect health deterioration and indicate the need to intensify RPM. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01878630) and Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00010239).

Telemedical management in patients waiting for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the ResKriVer-TAVI study design.

Aims: The majority of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) planned for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are elective outpatients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the time between the heart team's decision and TAVI increased due to limited healthcare resources. We therefore implemented telemedical approaches to identify AS patients at risk for clinical deterioration during the waiting time. The purpose of the prospective, randomized, controlled ResKriVer-TAVI study (DRKS00027842) is to investigate whether a digital concept of telemedical interventional management (TIM) in AS patients waiting for TAVI improves the clinical outcomes. In the present article, we report the study protocol of the ResKriVer-TAVI trial. Methods: ResKriVer-TAVI will enroll AS patients planned for elective TAVI. Randomization to the TIM group or standard care will be made on the day of the heart team's decision. TIM will include a daily assessment of weight, blood pressure, a 2-channel electrocardiogram, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, and a self-rated health status until admission for TAVI. TIM will allow optimization of medical therapy or an earlier admission for TAVI if needed. Standard care will not include any additional support for patients with AS. All patients of the TIM group will receive a rule-based TIM including standard operating procedures when a patient is crossing prespecified values of a vital sign. Results: The primary endpoint consists of days lost due to cardiovascular hospitalization and death of any cause within 180 days after the heart team's decision. Major secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality within 365 days, the number of telemedical interventions, and adherence to TIM. Follow-up visits will be conducted at admission for TAVI as well as 6 and 12 months after the heart team's decision. Conclusions: ResKriVer-TAVI will be the first randomized, controlled trial investigating a telemedical approach before TAVI in patients with AS. We hypothesize that primary and secondary endpoints of AS patients with TIM will be superior to standard care. The study will serve to establish TIM in the clinical routine and to increase the resilience of TAVI centers in situations with limited healthcare resources.