Reproducibility in echocardiographic two- and three-dimensional mitral valve assessment.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE) has been demonstrated to provide more accurate information than two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2DTEE) in the localization of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). However, most studies have been single-rater studies. Few results were tested for inter-observer variability with a single second rater. This multicenter study aimed to determine reliability of 2D and 3DTEE mitral valve evaluations by calculating inter-observer agreement between various echocardiographers. METHODS: Fifteen observers from 4 institutions in Germany and Switzerland interpreted 2D and 3DTEE images from 6 patients selected to represent a large spectrum of MVP diversity. Surgical findings served as reference. Individual assessments of MVP and ruptured chordae tendineae (ChR) pathology were compared by calculating Randolph's free-marginal multirater kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Accuracy of MVP evaluation with 3DTEE was 83.9%, CI [81.0%; 86.8%] and 78.7% CI [76.6% 80.8%] with 2DTEE. Flail leaflets with chordal ruptures were described correctly in 91.1%, CI [85.8, 96.4] with 3D compared to 71.1%, CI [65.0, 77.2] with 2DTEE. The multirater kappa coefficient of inter-observer agreement among all 15 observers was κ = 0.65/0.58 for 3D/2D evaluation of MVP and κ = 0.70/0.54 for detection of ChR. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional assessment of MVP was superior to 2DTEE, although the accuracy of both 3DTEE and 2DTEE was found to be lower than previously published. 3D MVP assessment is less operator dependent than 2DTEE evaluation. Although validity has been demonstrated before, we provide evidence that 3DTEE is reproducible among 15 observers and is a reliable method for MVP evaluation.

Experts and beginners benefit from three-dimensional echocardiography: a multicenter study on the assessment of mitral valve prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been claimed to provide more information than two-dimensional (2D) TEE in the localization of mitral valve prolapse (MVP). However, most studies have been performed by experts in echocardiography, without accounting for differences in training or expertise. This multicenter study was designed to assess the differences between experts and inexperienced echocardiographers in localizing MVP and ruptured chordae tendineae using 2D and real-time 3D TEE. METHODS: Thirty-six observers from 10 institutions in Germany and Switzerland interpreted 2D and 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images from six patients selected to represent a large spectrum of MVP diversity. Surgical findings served as a reference. Individual performance in the prediction of pathology was scored. Differences between 15 experts and 21 beginners in TEE were assessed, and the benefits conferred by 3D TEE were compared. RESULTS: Both study groups scored significantly higher when interpreting 3D transesophageal echocardiographic images (P ≤ .001). The experts were superior in 2D MVP localization (14.8%; P ≤ .001), a difference that diminished with 3D TEE (1.4%; P = .41). The benefit of access to 3D information for MVP localization was greater for inexperienced echocardiographers compared with experts (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The reported diagnostic advantage of 3D TEE over 2D TEE in MVP assessment for expert echocardiographers can be transferred to inexperienced echocardiographers. Inexperienced echocardiographers benefit from the technology to a greater extent than their expert colleagues.

Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: improvements in intraoperative mitral valve imaging.

BACKGROUND: Successful surgical repair of a regurgitant mitral valve (MV) is dependent on a comprehensive assessment of its complex anatomy. Although there is limited evidence of the feasibility and accuracy of intraoperative real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3DTEE) in MV surgery, its use is increasing worldwide. We designed this prospective observational study of patients with mitral regurgitation to test initial findings on the accuracy of RT3DTEE images in the diagnosis of MV prolapse and chordal rupture relative to 2D imaging and to assess the potential of RT3DTEE for visualizing leaflet clefts. METHODS: TEE-certified anesthesiologists examined 62 consecutive patients undergoing MV surgery by acquiring a full standard set of 2D TEE sections and 3D zoom recordings. Offline, 2D and 3D images were presented independently and in randomized order to 2 expert interpreters. Accuracy was determined using the surgical findings as the "gold standard." RESULTS: Surgical inspection identified 52 cases of MV prolapse (MVP). RT3DTEE correlated stronger with the surgical findings than 2D TEE for detection and localization of MVP (difference in proportions=33.9%, P<0.001) and chordal rupture (difference in proportions=25.8%, P<0.001). The superiority of RT3DTEE was significant for scallops A2, P1, P2 in MVP and A2, P2 in chordal rupture (all P<0.05). In 22 patients, leaflet clefts were also surgically repaired, and RT3DTEE was feasible in accessing them (κ=0.65, confidence interval [0.44, 0.81]). CONCLUSION: Although 2D TEE is currently the standard tool for intraoperative imaging in MV surgery, RT3DTEE improves the visualization of MV pathology and increases the accuracy of interpretation by facilitating spatial orientation. Further investigations, particularly those aimed at establishing its cost effectiveness, are indicated.