Analgesic efficacy of parenteral paracetamol (propacetamol) and diclofenac in post-operative orthopaedic pain.

BACKGROUND: Propacetamol is an injectable pro-drug of paracetamol (acetaminophen) with analgesic and antipyretic activities, especially used in the post-operative period. The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of intravenous paracetamol, administered as propacetamol, in comparison with placebo and intramuscular diclofenac in patients with post-operative pain. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study. One hundred and twenty patients with moderate to severe pain following total hip arthroplasty received either two administrations of propacetamol 2 g intravenously, 5 h apart (n = 40), one single administration of diclofenac 75 mg intramuscularly (n = 40) or placebo (n = 40). Efficacy measures were assessed before each drug administration, for the 5 h following each study treatment administration and for the total study duration of 10 h. Safety was assessed by reporting adverse events and changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) and biochemical investigations before and 24 h after dosing. RESULTS: Both active treatments were effective and statistically superior to placebo over the whole study period, as indicated by the total pain relief score. No significant differences were found between propacetamol and diclofenac for any measures of analgesic activity. Only minor and common adverse events were reported, with no overall differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Both active treatments were superior to placebo, and the overall efficacy of two intravenous infusions of propacetamol 2 g (equivalent to 1 g of paracetamol), 5 h apart, was not statistically different from that provided by a single intramuscular injection of diclofenac 75 mg over the first 5 h post-dose and over the total 10-h study period. The safety was good.

Comparison of the angiotensin II antagonist UP269-6 with the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril in normotensive volunteers challenged with angiotensin I.

We assessed the inhibitory effect of UP269-6, a new orally active angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonist, on the pressor action of exogenous ANG I in healthy male volunteers maintained on an unrestricted sodium intake and compared it with that of enalapril. Seven different single doses of UP269-6 ranging from 5 to 180 mg, 20 mg enalapril, or placebo were administered to 16 subjects in a double-blind fashion. The order of placebo and enalapril was randomized, and UP269-6 was given in an ascending dose order. The peak systolic blood pressure (SBP) response to a test dose of ANG I was determined serially before and after oral drug administration by monitoring finger BP by a photoplethysmographic method. No drug-related side effect was observed. There was a dose-dependent inhibition of the SBP response to the ANG I challenge. Doses as low as 40 to 80 mg had blocking effects quite similar to that of enalapril 20 mg. Ten hours after the 20- and 40-mg doses of UP269-6, the SBP response was still attenuated when drug levels no longer were measurable in plasma. UP269-6 also produced a dose-related increase in active renin and ANG II levels at 24 h after drug intake. In these volunteers on unrestricted salt intake, no statistically significant effect on 24-h urinary aldosterone excretion was observed. Based on these preliminary data, the pharmacokinetic drug half-life (t 1/2) was estimated at 4.7 h and the EC50 was estimated at 41 ng/ml. UP269-6 appears to be a well-tolerated, potent, orally active, antagonist of ANG II receptors in men. Doses of 40-80 mg might block the ANG I pressor response as does enalapril 20 mg.

[Efficacy and tolerance of an effervescent aspirin-metoclopramide combination in the treatment of a migraine attack. Randomized double-blind study using a placebo]. / Efficacité et tolérance de l'association effervescente aspirine-métoclopramide dans le traitement de la crise de migraine sans aura. Essai randomisé en double aveugle contre placebo.

OBJECTIVES: A double blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel group study was carried out to compare the efficacy and tolerance of aspirin 900 mg-metoclopramide 10 mg effervescent association (AAM) with those of placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attack. All patients were selected according to the International Headache Society criteria. METHODS: A total of 303 out-patients with an acute migraine attack were treated orally with either AAM (n = 152) or placebo (n = 151). RESULTS: The aspirin-metoclopramide association was significantly more effective than placebo at relieving headache (principal criterion) within 2 h of treatment (54.3% versus 25.9% : p < 0.001), producing entire resolution of acute migraine attack (14.2% versus 5.3% : p = 0.017), reducing the percentage of patients requiring rescue medication (44.3% versus 63.2% : p = 0.001) and increasing the percentage of patients able to resume their usual activities (44.1% versus 22.1% : p = 0.003). AAM also provided more frequent relief from associated symptoms as compared with placebo (37.4% versus 22.1% : p = 0.006). The therapeutic efficacy was rated as good or excellent by 39.7% of patients in the AAM group compared with 20.7% in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Moreover 64.2% of AAM treated patients said they would be prepared to take the treatment again compared with 46.4% who received placebo (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients reporting adverse events was not different between the two treatments (20.4% AAM versus 18.5% placebo : p = 0.684). The most commonly reported symptoms were gastro-intestinal disorders. Similar number of gastralgia occurred with AAM (n = 4) and placebo (n = 3). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the aspirin-metoclopramide association may be used as a first intention treatment of acute migraine attack in out-patients.