RESUMO
Background: Advances of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have brought long-term survival to the patients with hematologic malignancies. Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of major problems for the long- term survivors after allo-HCT. Dysregulation of immune reconstitution has been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic GVHD. Differences of immune reconstitution between cord blood transplantation (CBT) and unrelated bone marrow transplantation (UBMT) remain unclear in long-term survivors. We investigated immune reconstitution in patients surviving for more than 2 years after CBT (n=21) or UBMT (n=20) without relapse of underlying disease. Materials and Methods: Using flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood, we investigated immune reconstitution of T cells, B cells, and NK cells between CBT and UBMT patients. We collected clinical data regarding allo-HCT and examined the relation of immune reconstitution to the development of chronic GVHD. Results: Between CBT and UBMT patients, we found significant differences in absolute cell number of CD8+ as well as CD19+ cell and CD4/CD8 ratio even more than 2 years after allo-HCT. Among UBMT patients, absolute cell number of naive CD4+ cell was significantly lower in patients with chronic GVHD. In addition, we found significant differences in absolute cell number of CD19+ cell, especially naive B cell between patients with and without chronic GVHD in both CBT and UBMT patients. Conclusion: These results suggest that differences of immune recovery between CBT and UBMT patients may exist even in patients surviving for more than 2 years and might be related to the development of chronic GVHD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few randomized controlled trials have assessed the effects of laughter therapy on health-related quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate these effects as an exploratory endpoint in cancer patients as part of a randomized controlled trial conducted at a single institution in Japan. METHODS: The Initiative On Smile And CAncer (iOSACA) study was an open-label randomized controlled trial conducted in 2017 in which participants aged 40-64 years with cancer were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (laughter therapy) or control group (no laughter therapy). Each participant in the intervention group underwent a laughter therapy session once every two weeks for seven weeks (total of four sessions). Each session involved a laughter yoga routine followed by Rakugo or Manzai traditional Japanese verbal comedy performances. We assessed QOL as a secondary endpoint in this intention-to-treat population using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The questionnaire was completed at baseline (Week 0) and at Weeks 3 and 7. Mixed-effects models for repeated measures were developed to compare time-dependent changes in each QOL domain from baseline between the intervention and control groups. RESULTS: Four participants retracted consent and one participant was retrospectively excluded from analysis due to unmet inclusion criteria. The analysis was conducted using 56 participants, with 26 in the intervention group and 30 in the control group. Questionnaire completion rates were high (>90%), with similar QOL scores reported at baseline in both groups. The mixed-effects models showed that the intervention group had significantly better cognitive function and less pain than the control group for a short period. CONCLUSION: Laughter therapy may represent a beneficial, noninvasive complementary intervention in the clinical setting. Further studies are needed to verify the hypotheses generated from this exploratory study.
