RESUMO
Edible insects, such as mealworms (Tenebrio molitor larvae; TM) and crickets (Acheta domesticus; AD), are a sustainable, protein-dense novel food with a favorable amino acid profile, which might be an alternative to animal proteins. To assess the protein quality of TM and AD, we assessed the digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAAS), considering individual amino acids and their ileal amino acid digestibility, using an in vitro model based on the INFOGEST digestion protocol. In addition, we evaluated if various processing and food preparation steps influenced the in vitro digestibility of individual amino acids and the in vitro DIAAS values of TM and AD and compared them to chicken breast as a reference of excellent protein quality. The total protein in vitro digestibility ranged from 91 to 99% for TM and from 79 to 93% for AD and was negatively affected by oven-drying and, to a lesser extent, by chitin-reduction. The in vitro DIAAS values were 113, 89, and 92 for chicken, blanched TM, and blanched AD, respectively, when considering the indispensable amino acid (IAA) requirements of young children between 6 months and 3 years. Across different processing and food preparation methods, the in vitro DIAAS values ranged between 59 and 89 for TM and between 40 and 92 for AD, with the lowest values found in chitin-reduced insects. Due to their similarities to chicken regarding protein composition, total protein in vitro digestibility, and in vitro DIAAS values, TM and AD might be an alternative to traditional animal proteins, provided that suitable processing and food preparation methods are applied. Our in vitro DIAAS results suggest that TM and AD can thus be considered good-quality protein sources for children older than 6 months. The DIAAS calculations are currently based on crude protein (total nitrogen × 6.25), resulting in an overestimation of insect protein content, and leading to an underestimation and potential misclassification of protein quality. The in vitro model applied in this study is a valuable tool for product development to optimize the protein quality of edible insects. Further studies are required to assess the in vivo DIAAS of insects in humans.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Edible insects have a low ecological footprint and could serve as an alternative dietary iron source. However, chitin, a major component of insects, avidly binds iron and might inhibit iron absorption. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to measure fractional iron absorption (FIA) from Tenebrio molitor-based test meals with and without dechitinization, and to assess the effect of native and low chitin T. molitor on FIA from iron-fortified maize porridge. METHODS: We measured iron absorption in young females with low iron stores (n = 21) from 1) labeled (54FeSO4) fortified maize porridge (maize alone); 2) intrinsically labeled (57Fe added during rearing) T. molitor larvae with native chitin content (NC) added to maize alone; and 3) dechitinized intrinsically labeled (57Fe) T. molitor larvae with low chitin content (LC) added to maize alone. We determined FIA using erythrocyte isotope incorporation and measured in vitro iron dialyzability from the 3 meals. RESULTS: NC and LC T. molitor had similar mean ± SD iron content (12.0 ± 0.1 mg/100 g). Geometric mean (95% CI) FIAs from the 3 test meals were 1) maize alone: 5.8% (3.2%, 10.8%); 2) maize + NC T. molitor: 5.3% (2.5%, 11.3%) and 4.1% (1.9%, 8.7%); and 3) maize + LC T. molitor: 4.6% (2.0%, 10.3%) and 4.0% (1.8%, 9.2%), for extrinsic and intrinsic labels, respectively. FIA from NC and LC T. molitor did not significantly differ, and both were lower (P < 0.005) than FIA from the labeled maize porridge in the 3 meals, which did not significantly differ. The slopes of the relations between FIA and serum ferritin in the different meals and from the intrinsic and extrinsic labels did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: T. molitor biomass does not strongly affect iron absorption when added to maize porridge. Our data suggest T. molitor iron is absorbed from the common nonheme iron pool. Native T. molitor is high in iron which is moderately well absorbed, suggesting it could be a valuable dietary iron source.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04510831.
