Significance of intraoperative testing in right-sided implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) from the left pectoral region is the standard therapeutical method. Increasing numbers of system revisions due to lead dysfunction and infections will consecutively increase the numbers of right-sided implantations. The reliability of devices implanted on the right pectoral side remains controversially discussed, and the question of testing these devices remains unanswered. METHODS: In a prospectively designed study all 870 patients (60.0 ± 14 years, 689 male) who were treated with a first ICD from July 2005 until May 2012 and tested intraoperatively according to the testing protocol were analyzed. The indication for implantation was primary prophylactic in 71.5%. Underlying diseases included ischemic cardiomyopathy (50%), dilative cardiomyopathy (37%), and others (13%). Mean ejection faction was 27 ± 12%. Implantation site was right in 4.5% and left in 95.5%. RESULTS: Five patients supplied with right-sided ICD (13%, p = 0.02 as compared to left-sided) failed initial intraoperative testing with 21 J. 3 patients were male. The age of the patients failing intraoperative testing with right-sided devices appeared higher than of patients with left-sided devices (p = 0.07). The ejection fraction was 28 ± 8%. All patients reached a sufficient DFT ≤ 21 J after corrective procedures. CONCLUSION: Implantation of ICDs on the right side results in significantly higher failure rate of successful termination of intraoperatively induced ventricular fibrillation. The data of our study suggest the necessity of intraoperative ICD testing in right-sided implanted ICDs.

Shock or no shock - a question of philosophy or should intraoperative implantable cardioverter defibrillator testing be recommended?

OBJECTIVES: Implantation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with a high risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias is a standard therapy. The development of new ICD leads, shock algorithms, high-energy defibrillators and rapid energy supply has improved the devices. Nevertheless, the discussion regarding 'shock or no shock' to test the system intraoperatively has not silenced yet. METHODS: In this study, all 718 patients (60.0 ± 14.2 years old, 570 male) who were treated with a first ICD at our institution since 2005 were analysed. The indication for implantation was primarily prophylactic in 511 patients (71.3%). Underlying diseases included ischaemic cardiomyopathy (358 patients, 50%), dilated cardiomyopathy (270 patients, 37.7%) and others (12.3%). Mean ejection fraction was 27.4 ± 11.8%. Intraoperative ventricular fibrillation was induced with a T-wave shock or burst stimulation. The primary end-point was failing the initial intraoperative testing. RESULTS: During the initial testing, 28 patients (3.9%) had a defibrillation threshold (DFT) >21 J. The mean age of these patients was 51 ± 14 years, ranging from 22 to 71 years, 20 were male, and the ejection fraction was 23.8 ± 11.8%. The indication for ICD implantation was prophylactic in 13 patients. Twenty-one of the 28 patients suffered from dilated cardiomyopathy, whereas seven patients had ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Twenty-four ICDs were implanted on the left side and four on the right side. None of the patients had been treated with amiodarone at the time of implantation. All patients achieved a sufficient DFT ≤ 21 J by changing the ICD leads, device repositioning and/or optimizing the shock configuration. CONCLUSIONS: The standard of care intraoperative ICD testing remains necessary.

Giant coronary aneurysms exceeding 5 cm in size.

Giant coronary artery aneurysms (gCAAs) with a diameter exceeding 5 cm are extremely rare. The pathomechanisms and therapeutical measures in such cases have been controversial topics of discussion. Twenty-seven patients with gCAAs exceeding 5 cm in size described in the literature were evaluated. A case with multiple gCAAs at our department was included in the analysis. Apart from atherosclerosis of all coronary arteries, a large (1.5 2.5 cm) left anterior descending coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) and a gCAA (10.6 9.2 cm) originating from the right coronary artery, the latter causing recurrent myocardial ischaemia with the occlusion of the peripheral right coronary artery and compressing the right cardiac cavities, were the pathological findings in our 43-year old male patient. gCAAs predominantly develop at the proximal right coronary artery. The majority of these aneurysms develop secondary to atherosclerotic lesions in young patients. We performed a successful surgical excision of the right gCAA, tightening of the left anterior descending artery aneurysm and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. A pathological examination confirmed advanced atherosclerosis. Microbiological examinations could find no signs of infectious causes. CAAs bear a significant risk of severe complications and have a high risk of mortality. A more aggressive surgical approach should be recommended.

Prospective randomized clinical study of arterial pumps used for routine on pump coronary bypass grafting.

In a number of studies, centrifugal blood pumps--in comparison with roller pumps--have been shown to attenuate trauma to blood components. Nevertheless, the impact of these results on the postoperative course needs to be discussed controversially. In a prospective randomized study, 240 consecutive adult patients underwent elective myocardial revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass employing five different pumps (Roller, Avecor, Sarns, Rotaflow, Bio-Medicus). We analyzed clinical course, blood loss, damage of blood components, and impairment of the hemostatic system. The study population was homogenous with respect to age, gender, myocardial function, and operative data. No differences were found with respect to time of ventilation, duration of intensive care stay, hospitalization, and laboratory data. The choice of arterial pump during standard extracorporeal bypass for elective coronary artery bypass grafting is no matter of concern.