Use of Mechanical Ventilation Across 3 Countries.

Importance: The ability to provide invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is a mainstay of modern intensive care; however, whether rates of IMV vary among countries is unclear. Objective: To estimate the per capita rates of IMV in adults across 3 high-income countries with large variation in per capita intensive care unit (ICU) bed availability. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined 2018 data of patients aged 20 years or older who received IMV in England, Canada, and the US. Exposure: The country in which IMV was received. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the age-standardized rate of IMV and ICU admissions in each country. Rates were stratified by age, specific diagnoses (acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolus, upper gastrointestinal bleed), and comorbidities (dementia, dialysis dependence). Data analyses were conducted between January 1, 2021, and December 1, 2022. Results: The study included 59 873 hospital admissions with IMV in England (median [IQR] patient age, 61 [47-72] years; 59% men, 41% women), 70 250 in Canada (median [IQR] patient age, 65 [54-74] years; 64% men, 36% women), and 1 614 768 in the US (median [IQR] patient age, 65 [54-74] years; 57% men, 43% women). The age-standardized rate per 100 000 population of IMV was the lowest in England (131; 95% CI, 130-132) compared with Canada (290; 95% CI, 288-292) and the US (614; 95% CI, 614-615). Stratified by age, per capita rates of IMV were more similar across countries among younger patients and diverged markedly in older patients. Among patients aged 80 years or older, the crude rate of IMV per 100 000 population was highest in the US (1788; 95% CI, 1781-1796) compared with Canada (694; 95% CI, 679-709) and England (209; 95% CI, 203-214). Concerning measured comorbidities, 6.3% of admitted patients who received IMV in the US had a diagnosis of dementia (vs 1.4% in England and 1.3% in Canada). Similarly, 5.6% of admitted patients in the US were dependent on dialysis prior to receiving IMV (vs 1.3% in England and 0.3% in Canada). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that patients in the US received IMV at a rate 4 times higher than in England and twice that in Canada in 2018. The greatest divergence was in the use of IMV among older adults, and patient characteristics among those who received IMV varied markedly. The differences in overall use of IMV among these countries highlight the need to better understand patient-, clinician-, and systems-level choices associated with the varied use of a limited and expensive resource.

Surgeon Postoperative Opioid Prescribing Intensity and Risk of Persistent Opioid Use Among Opioid-naive Adult Patients: A Population-based Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between surgeon opioid prescribing intensity and subsequent persistent opioid use among patients undergoing surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The extent to which different postoperative prescribing practices lead to persistent opioid use among surgical patients is poorly understood. METHODS: Retrospective population-based cohort study assessing opioid-naive adults who underwent 1 of 4 common surgeries. For each surgical procedure, the surgeons' opioid prescribing intensity was categorized into quartiles based on the median daily dose of morphine equivalents of opioids dispensed within 7 days of the surgical visit for all the surgeons' patients. The primary outcome was persistent opioid use in the year after surgery, defined as 180 days or more of opioids supplied within the year after the index date excluding prescriptions filled within 30 days of the index date. Secondary outcomes included a refill for an opioid within 30 days and emergency department visits and hospitalizations within 1 year. RESULTS: Among 112,744 surgical patients, patients with surgeons in the highest intensity quartile (Q4) were more likely to fill an opioid prescription within 7 days after surgery compared with those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (83.3% Q4 vs 65.4% Q1). In the primary analysis, the incidence of persistent opioid use in the year after surgery was rare in both highest and lowest quartiles (0.3% Q4 vs 0.3% Q1), adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 1.18, 95% CI 0.83-1.66). However, multiple analyses using stricter definitions of persistent use that included the requirement of a prescription filled within 7 days of discharge after surgery showed a significant association with surgeon quartile (up to an AOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25, 1.47). Patients in Q4 were more likely to refill a prescription within 30 days (4.8% Q4 vs 4.0% Q1, AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons' overall prescribing practices may contribute to persistent opioid use and represent a target for quality improvement. However, the association was highly sensitive to the definition of persistent use used.

The effects of acute care hospitalization on health and cost trajectories for nursing home residents: A matched cohort study.

Thirty five percent to sixty seven percent of admissions to acute care hospitals from nursing homes are potentially preventable. Limited data exist regarding clinical and cost trajectories post an acute care hospitalization. To describe clinical impact and post-hospitalization costs associated with acute care admissions for nursing home residents. Analysis of population-based data. The 65,996 nursing home residents from a total of 645 nursing homes. Clinical outcomes assessed with the Changes in Health, End-stage disease and Symptoms and Signs (CHESS) scores, and monthly costs. Post-index date, hospitalized residents worsened their clinical conditions, with increases in CHESS scores (CHESS 3 + 24.5% vs 7.6%, SD 0.46), more limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) (86.1% vs 76.0%, SD 0.23), more prescriptions (+1.64 95% CI 1.43-1.86, P < .001), falls (30.9% vs 18.1%, SD 0.16), pressure ulcers (16.4% vs 8.6%, SD 0.37), and bowel incontinence (47.3% vs 39.3%, SD 0.35). Acute care hospitalizations for nursing home residents had a significant impact on their clinical and cost trajectories upon return to the nursing home. Investments in preventive strategies at the nursing home level, and to mitigate functional decline of hospitalized frail elderly residents may lead to improved quality of care and reduced costs for this population. Pre-hospitalization costs were not different between the hospitalized and control groups but showed an immediate increase post-hospitalization (CAD 1882.60 per month, P < .001).

Location and outcomes of rehospitalizations after critical illness in a single-payer healthcare system.

PURPOSE: Unplanned rehospitalization at a hospital other than the initial hospital may contribute to poor outcomes. We examined the location of rehospitalizations and assessed outcomes following critical illness in a single-payer healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Population-based retrospective cohort study using linked datasets (2012-2017) from Ontario, Canada including adults (≥18 years) with an unplanned rehospitalization within 30-days after an index hospitalization that included an ICU stay with mechanical ventilation. Outcomes were the percentage of 30-day rehospitalizations at non-index hospitals, mortality and costs. We employed logistic regression and generalized linear models to assess associations. RESULTS: There were 14,997 (16.4%) 30-day rehospitalizations. Of these 2765 (18.4%) occurred in a non-index hospital. Distance of home residence from the index hospital was the strongest predictor of a non-index rehospitalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 8.40, 95%CI 7.05-10.01, highest vs. lowest distance quintile). Within 30-days of rehospitalization, deaths (aOR 0.91, 95%CI (0.80-1.04)) and total healthcare costs (adjusted relative risk 1.03 (1.00-1.06)), were similar for patients readmitted to the index or a non-index hospital. CONCLUSION: Non-index rehospitalization within 30-days of initial discharge is common following critical illness. These rehospitalizations were not significantly associated with an increased risk of harm or higher costs in a single-payer healthcare system.

First-Line Vasopressor Use in Septic Shock and Route of Administration: An Epidemiologic Study.

Rationale: Norepinephrine is a first-line agent for the treatment of hypotension in septic shock. However, its frequency of use and potential barriers to its use are unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of use of norepinephrine in septic shock, to identify potential barriers to its use, and to evaluate trends in use of vasopressors over time. Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study of patients with septic shock in Alberta, Canada, between July 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was receipt of a first-line vasopressor other than norepinephrine ("nonnorepinephrine vasopressor"). Predictors of receiving a nonnorepinephrine vasopressor were assessed using a multivariable-adjusted, multilevel logistic regression model with intensive care unit as a random effect. Results: Among 6,343 patients with septic shock, the proportion of patients receiving nonnorepinephrine vasopressors as first-line treatment decreased steadily from 11.5% in 2012 to 3.0% in 2018. Two factors most strongly associated with their receipt were having peripheral intravenous access only (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.58-8.26; P < 0.001) and year of admission (aOR, 0.74 per year after 2012; 95% CI, 0.69-0.80; P < 0.001). Other factors that had associations after adjustment included admission to a nonteaching hospital (aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.23-3.89; P = 0.007), admission to a coronary care unit (aOR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.001-6.54; P = 0.05), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (aOR, 0.92 per unit increase; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96; P < 0.001), and heart rate (aOR, 0.92 per 10-beat per minute increase; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97; P = 0.002). Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients in Alberta, Canada, we found a steady decrease in use of first-line vasopressors other than norepinephrine in septic shock. The strongest factor associated with their use was the presence of only peripheral venous access, suggesting that this may still be considered a barrier to administration of norepinephrine.

Acute healthcare resource utilization by age: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Granular data related to the likelihood of individuals of different ages accessing acute and critical care services over time is lacking. METHODS: We used population-based, administrative data from Ontario to identify residents of specific ages (20, 30, 40, etc. to 100) on January 1st every year from 1995-2019. We assessed rates of emergency department (ED) visits (2003-19), hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (2003-19), and mechanical ventilation. FINDINGS: Overall the 25-year study period, ED were the most common acute healthcare encounter with 100-year-olds having the lowest rate (138.7/1,000) and 90-year-olds the highest (378.5/1,000). Rates of hospitalization ranged from 24.2/1,000 for those age 20 up to 224.9/1,000 for those age 90. Rates of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were lowest for those age 20 (1.0 and 0.4/1,000), more than tripled by age 50 (3.3 and 1.7/1,000) and peaked at age 80 (20.3 and 10.1/1,000). Over time rates of ED visits increased (164.3 /1,000 in 2003 vs 199.1 /1,000 in 2019) as did rates of invasive mechanical ventilation (2.0/1,000 in 1995 vs 2.9/1,000 in 2019), whereas rates of ICU admission remained stable (4.8/1,000 in 2003 vs 4.9/1,000 in 2019) and hospitalization declined (66.8/1,000 in 1995 vs 51.5/1,000 in 2019). Age stratified analysis demonstrated that rates of ED presentation increased for those age 70 and younger while hospitalization decreased for all age groups; ICU admission and mechanical ventilation rates changed variably by age, with increasing rates demonstrated primarily among people under the age of 50. INTERPRETATION: Rates of hospitalizations have decreased over time across all age groups, whereas rates of ED presentation, ICU admissions, and mechanical ventilation have increased, primarily driven by younger adults. These findings suggest that although the delivery of healthcare may be moving away from inpatient medicine, there is a growing population of young adults requiring significant healthcare resources.

Temporal Trends and Sex Differences in Intensity of Healthcare at the End of Life in Adults With Heart Failure.

Background Patients with chronic disease prefer an adequately supported death at home, but often die in the hospital. We assessed temporal trends and sex differences in healthcare intensity and location of death among decedents with heart failure. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with heart failure who died between April 1, 2004 and March 31, 2017 in Ontario, Canada. We used population-based administrative databases to assess healthcare utilization during the last 6 months of life and applied multilevel multivariable logistic regression to assess whether sex was independently associated with location of death. Among 396 024 decedents with heart failure, mean (SD) age was 81.8 (10.7) years, 51.5% were women, and 53.4% had in-hospital deaths. From 2004 to 2016, there was an increase in patients receiving mechanical ventilation (15.1%-19.6%), hemodialysis (5.2%-6.8%), and cardiac revascularization (1.7%-2.3%). Relative to men, women spent fewer days in a hospital (mean, 16.4 versus 18.3; mean difference, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.7-2.0; P<0.001) and in an intensive care unit (mean, 2.1 versus 3.0; mean difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; P<0.001); and less commonly received mechanical ventilation (15.5% versus 20.8%; P<0.001); hemodialysis (4.8% versus 7.7%; P<0.001); or cardiac catheterization (2.8% versus 4.6%; P<0.001). Female sex was independently associated with lower odds of in-hospital death (odds ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.87-0.89). Mean (SD) 6-month direct healthcare cost was greater for in-hospital ($52 349 [$55 649]) than out-of-hospital ($35 998 [$31 900]) death. Conclusions Among decedents with heart failure, invasive care in the last 6 months increased in prevalence over time but was less common in women, who had lower odds of dying in a hospital.

Frailty and long-term outcomes following critical illness: A population-level cohort study.

PURPOSE: To provide population-level estimates of the association of frailty with one-year outcomes after critical illness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients who survived an ICU admission between April 2002 and March 2015. Pre-existing frailty was classified using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator. Multivariable Cox regression and Fine and Gray models were used to examine the association between frailty and mortality and hospital readmission. RESULTS: Of 534,991 patients, 19.3% had pre-existing frailty. Compared to non-frail survivors, at one-year frail patients had higher mortality (18.3% vs 9.5%, adjusted HR 1.17 95% CI: 1.15-1.19) and hospital readmission (44.4% vs 36.6%, adjusted HR 1.10 95% CI: 1.08-1.11) and a CAN$19,628 (95% CI: $19,279-$19,997) greater increase in healthcare costs compared to the year prior to hospitalization. The association between frailty and mortality was stronger among older individuals, but the risk of readmission among frail patients decreased with age. CONCLUSION: Patients with pre-existing frailty who develop critical illness have higher rates of hospital readmission and death than patients without frailty, and age modifies these associations. These data highlight the importance of considering both frailty and age when seeking to identify at-risk patients who might benefit from closer follow-up after discharge.

Comparison of 2 Triage Scoring Guidelines for Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators.

Importance: In the current setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there is concern for the possible need for triage criteria for ventilator allocation; to our knowledge, the implications of using specific criteria have never been assessed. Objective: To determine which and how many admissions to intensive care units are identified as having the lowest priority for ventilator allocation using 2 distinct sets of proposed triage criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study conducted in spring 2020 used data collected from US hospitals and reported in the Philips eICU Collaborative Research Database. Adult admissions (N = 40 439) to 291 intensive care units from 2014 to 2015 who received mechanical ventilation and were not elective surgery patients were included. Exposures: New York State triage criteria and original triage criteria proposed by White and Lo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were calculated for admissions. The proportion of patients who met initial criteria for the lowest level of priority for mechanical ventilation using each set of criteria and their characteristics and outcomes were assessed. Agreement was compared between the 2 sets of triage criteria, recognizing differences in stated criteria aims. Results: Among 40 439 intensive care unit admissions of patients who received mechanical ventilation, the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (16.6) years, 54.9% were male, and the mean (SD) SOFA score was 4.5 (3.7). Using the New York State triage criteria, 8.9% (95% CI, 8.7%-9.2%) were in the lowest priority category; these lowest priority admissions had a mean (SD) age of 62.9 (16.6) years, used a median (interquartile range) of 57.3 (20.1-133.5) ventilator hours each, and had a hospital survival rate of 38.6% (95% CI, 37.0%-40.2%). Using the White and Lo triage criteria, 4.3% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.5%) were in the lowest priority category; these admissions had a mean (SD) age of 68.6 (13.2) years, used a median (interquartile range) of 61.7 (24.3-142.8) ventilator hours each, and had a hospital survival rate of 56.2% (95% CI, 53.8%-58.7%). Only 655 admissions (1.6%) were in the lowest priority category for both guidelines, with the κ statistic for agreement equal to 0.20 (95% CI, 0.18-0.21). Conclusions and Relevance: Use of 2 initially proposed ventilator triage guidelines identified approximately 1 in every 10 to 25 admissions as having the lowest priority for ventilator allocation, with little agreement. Clinical assessment of different potential criteria for triage decisions in critically ill populations is important to ensure valid and equitable allocation of resources.